President Donald J. Trump

[mikuthing01]

Liberal protesters went to a Trump rally wearing KKK hoods and proceeds to get his ass beat by a black guy. Holy shit these protesters are fucking stupid this is the best election ever thank you Trump.

Edit: i guess the black guy was a BLM protester not a Trump supporter. So now liberals are beating the shit out of each other at Trump rallies lololololol

https://twitter.com/frankthorpNBC/status/711323229399298048

[mikuthing01]

Libtard that started it all

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YBHoyzysWIk

And he was such a pussy he did not wear a hood himself he made his g/f do it

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MEloKpNT2F4

[The King of Kings]

Liberal protesters went to a Trump rally wearing KKK hoods and proceeds to get his ass beat by a black guy. Holy shit these protesters are fucking stupid this is the best election ever thank you Trump.

Edit: i guess the black guy was a BLM protester not a Trump supporter. So now liberals are beating the shit out of each other at Trump rallies lololololol

So two different anti-Trump groups who are there to disrupt other people's freedom end up getting into a fight against themselves?

How glorious.

We already know liberals are violent and angry, but this is awesome.

I am sure the media will paint it as Trump's fault though, and the low IQ average liberal will believe it. 

[mikuthing01]

Man plows though crying anti Trump protesters with a jeep and cop just shrugs lol

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-1ZzFPAwhDg

[CornyCrow]

I actually think the protesters will bring more support for Trump in the long run. He's getting all the press coverage.

I agree with you.  Hitler actually manufactured opposition at times because of the rebound effect.  Those protestors are short on brains.  Just like naming a group BLM - the first thing you must agree on is some objective and then work towards that.  Tying up traffic only makes folks angry with you and designating 'Black' in a groups title makes you think, if you are not black, that you needn't bother with it or its goals.     

[albrecht]

I agree with you.  Hitler actually manufactured opposition at times because of the rebound effect.  Those protestors are short on brains.  Just like naming a group BLM - the first thing you must agree on is some objective and then work towards that.  Tying up traffic only makes folks angry with you and designating 'Black' in a groups title makes you think, if you are not black, that you needn't bother with it or its goals.   

So question, and I'm not stating my opinion, do you think these (and others we've seen in very recent times) protester groups (BLM, anti-Trump, Occupy, SJW/anti-rape on campus, etc) are just 'short on brains' or, in some cases, controlled/funded by other elements taking advantage of their naïveté and/or, if some (or their leaders and social media) are controlled/funded, if so by whom? (I could see a theory for several reasons groups and conflicting theories and ideas with sometimes conflicting goals.)

[mikuthing01]

Why are liberals so violent they are even abusing animals now

[CornyCrow]

So question, and I'm not stating my opinion, do you think these (and others we've seen in very recent times) protester groups (BLM, anti-Trump, Occupy, SJW/anti-rape on campus, etc) are just 'short on brains' or, in some cases, controlled/funded by other elements taking advantage of their naïveté and/or, if some (or their leaders and social media) are controlled/funded, if so by whom? (I could see a theory for several reasons groups and conflicting theories and ideas with sometimes conflicting goals.)

I'm not in a position to know that.  I do think that there is an obvious movement to equalize the standard of living in the world and ultimately to drop national boundaries.  How did Orwell know, all those many years ago? 

[mikuthing01]

So two different anti-Trump groups who are there to disrupt other people's freedom end up getting into a fight against themselves?

How glorious.

We already know liberals are violent and angry, but this is awesome.

I am sure the media will paint it as Trump's fault though, and the low IQ average liberal will believe it.

nm i guess black guy WAS a trump supporter which still goes against the narrative that the media is trying like hell to push. How does the media report a black guy beating up a white guy at a Trump rally? I am guessing kinda like how when a black guy open carried a AR15 at a obama protest and they zoomed in on his rifle and shirt in the interview and would not show his skin to whitewash him as much as possible.

[albrecht]

I'm not in a position to know that.  I do think that there is an obvious movement to equalize the standard of living in the world and ultimately to drop national boundaries.  How did Orwell know, all those many years ago?

Agreed there. I think there are often-conflicting goals/groups and not, necessarily, a "controlling hand" or ultimate fund-raiser but certainly clever manipulation of different sides for certain goals- ultimately a global state- though I agree that by necessity, likely, it would not be, at least as appears to the lay-man,  'global' but organized on some kind of various Continental organizations so that there is always some enemy or reason for the spending and internal control mechanisms. There are a lot of "useful idiots," as attributed (with no sourcing) too, as Lenin said.

[GuerrillaUnReal]

I saw a theory online that Trump is being administered some sort of steroid treatment for the mental effects of it. It seems insane but Trump is brilliant at making the left look as stupid as it is and concocting brilliant political strategies. Granted it's not hard as he's a top tier celebrity and the left has been out of control illogical for the last few years. But it's amazing watching liberals devour themselves this election season.

[GuerrillaUnReal]

So question, and I'm not stating my opinion, do you think these (and others we've seen in very recent times) protester groups (BLM, anti-Trump, Occupy, SJW/anti-rape on campus, etc) are just 'short on brains' or, in some cases, controlled/funded by other elements taking advantage of their naïveté and/or, if some (or their leaders and social media) are controlled/funded, if so by whom? (I could see a theory for several reasons groups and conflicting theories and ideas with sometimes conflicting goals.)

I think you have a lot of useful idiots who are being manipulated by extreme leftists and leftist culture who've made a career out of their grievances. Think of what every social justice professor, tumblr feminist, Gawker, community college washout and social justice warrior stand to lose if this politically correct age suddenly dies. They're actually going to have to produce elements of value to survive instead of crying and using 19th century philosophy and white guilt to survive. That's why the left is losing their shit over Trump as the promise of an easy ride dies with his election.

I also think you have elements who are contributing to extremist leftist organizations to keep different classes fighting and the attention off themselves.

I saw a poll recently where 77% of the country thinks we're too politically correct. That's what is fueling Trump's political rise.

[RealCool Daddio]

Trump is a disaster.  Righties like to talk up his managerial skills, but he can't even control his campaign manager.  First he manhandles a Brietbart reporter - cause, you know, Brietbart is apparently part of the reviled mainstream media now - and now he is attacking protesters. Any competent leader would have fired this thug ages ago.

http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/mar/19/trump-campaign-manager-lewandowski-arizona-rally

[albrecht]

Trump is a disaster.  Righties like to talk up his managerial skills, but he can't even control his campaign manager.  First he manhandles a Brietbart reporter - cause, you know, Brietbart is apparently part of the reviled mainstream media now - and now he is attacking protesters. Any competent leader would have fired this thug ages ago.

http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/mar/19/trump-campaign-manager-lewandowski-arizona-rally

Let's leave aside this weird fascination or obsession with other people's countries, why won't you reply? I offered an instant road-map, right up 35, for the precious cartels and illegals to your Great White North? Pretty easily implemented, considering the already available infrastructure and flow. And you also refuse to comment, interestingly, on your "native" sexual abuse problem. But again, accepting illegals from my "highway," and for those of particular tastes simply shutting down your concerns and investigations and laws on other immigration could allow all tastes. Snakeheads, Coyotes, and, if you would take in more "refugees" (use some civil vessels) there would be no REASON to exploit the indigenous. A win-win. Canada has a vast open area: it is very, very racist to not open it up to all.

[SciFiAuthor]

Let's leave aside this weird fascination or obsession with other people's countries, why won't you reply? I offered an instant road-map, right up 35, for the precious cartels and illegals to your Great White North? Pretty easily implemented, considering the already available infrastructure and flow. Any you also refuse to comment, interestingly, on your "native" sexual abuse problem. But again, accepting illegals from my "highway," and for those of particular tastes simply shutting down your concerns and investigations and laws on other immigration could allow all tastes. Snakeheads, Coyotes, and, if you would take in more "refugees" (use some civil vessels) there would be no REASON to exploit the indigenous. A win-win. Canada has a vast open area: it is very, very racist to not open it up to all.

Indeed, if we're supposed to absorb millions of illegals, then Canada has a moral obligation to accept them too. I suggest they go to Québec. That way all the signage can be bilingual French/Spanish. Arrêt/Alto. It will look great! Make Canada Great Again!

[albrecht]

Indeed, if we're supposed to absorb millions of illegals, then Canada has a moral obligation to accept them too. I suggest they go to Québec. That way all the signage can be bilingual French/Spanish. Arrêt/Alto. It will look great!

Thanks. Though, of course, we aren't supposed to, nor intended to", absorb them" and therein lies, a part, of  the problem. Not the whole part- but a big one.

Often, there is no intended assimilation, acceptance of liberal/Western values, wanting to "join" in some cultural understanding or commonly held beliefs, indeed, often, not even wanting to have a common language. Or, in the worst cases, wanting to kill, rape, or steal from some sense of bizarre backwards religiosity or "right of capture and retaking" of taking back (or towards) a neo Plan of San Diego or Caliphate. It is crazy.

[SciFiAuthor]

Thanks. Though, of course, we aren't supposed to, nor intended to  "absorb them" and therein lies, part, of  the problem.

Wait, you mean the Anglo-Canadians don't absorb groups determined not to integrate and follow the law? Well fuck me running. Or as they say in Québec, Je me souviens. Née dans les lis, je grandis dans les roses. Eventually that gets translated to Spanish. Make Canada great again, deport our illegals north where they don't have enough. Especially to Québec.

[albrecht]

Wait, you mean the Anglo-Canadians don't absorb groups determined not to integrate and follow the law? Well fuck me running. Or as they say in Québec, Je me souviens. Née dans les lis.

I honestly want all people to get along. And also like "diversity." Not the in the PC way but in the real way that countries, nations, people, family, friends, language, culture, religions, etc can have their own ways. It makes the world and travel more interesting and, I think, more peaceful. Forcing "diversity" via open-borders or international demands (or more on a local basis to schools, jobs, or even government- without regard to performance or qualifications of the individual? Crazy.) I do, though, find odd, that is is ONLY "western" areas that are demanded to be "diverse," have no borders, accept "refugees," change their laws and culture to "accommodate." Odd, that.

[Value Of Pi]

I'm not in a position to know that.  I do think that there is an obvious movement to equalize the standard of living in the world and ultimately to drop national boundaries.  How did Orwell know, all those many years ago?

There's been this same movement throughout recorded history, just with different names and philosophies as window dressing. The last one was Communism and before that all the empire building east and west across the world, with poorer nations and peoples looking to get richer at the expense of those better off or better endowed with natural resources (and rule the world if possible). Bring home the war booty and slaves and you have redressed your economic grievances and vanquished income inequality -- until someone else comes along and grabs what you've got.

Orwell could foresee an all-powerful "world government" because totalitarianism was already a well-established fact of history when he saw the communists and fascists get into power. Only the global reach and industrialized nature of their regimes and the pervasiveness of their propaganda machines was new.

So we now have a similar story of economic "equalization" playing out again but there is, IMO, not very much that is new about the basics of what is happening. And the world is still a very, very difficult place for one government or leader to control.

[Lt.Uhura]

Trump is a disaster.  Righties like to talk up his managerial skills, but he can't even control his campaign manager.  First he manhandles a Brietbart reporter - cause, you know, Brietbart is apparently part of the reviled mainstream media now - and now he is attacking protesters. Any competent leader would have fired this thug ages ago.

http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/mar/19/trump-campaign-manager-lewandowski-arizona-rally

It looks like he's another self-serving yahoo expecting a position in Trump's cabinet.  Maybe Trump can post him and Duke as security on the Wall.

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/03/donald-trump-corey-lewandowski-220742

[albrecht]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O7TYB-81a4U
I thought he had him a winner!

[GuerrillaUnReal]

Ding ding ding, good night pal.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ADLa7xPNBAg

[The King of Kings]

Ding ding ding, good night pal.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ADLa7xPNBAg

God Damn.  That worthless liberal bernie cuck got knocked the fuck out.

Dude had a mean left hook.  I love that the music was timed perfectly.

Fucking loving this political cycle.

#Blackpunchesmatter

[FightTheFuture]

Trump is a disgusting pig and should withdraw from this election cycle immediately after he apologizes to the American people for being such a national  embarrassment.

[GuerrillaUnReal]

Social justice warrior white liberals dressing up as members of the KKK getting knocked the fuck out by black followers of the Republican Presidential front runner at a Republican rally while white cucks outside scream how they want their own genocide.



In the year 2016.

[Value Of Pi]

Agreed there. I think there are often-conflicting goals/groups and not, necessarily, a "controlling hand" or ultimate fund-raiser but certainly clever manipulation of different sides for certain goals- ultimately a global state- though I agree that by necessity, likely, it would not be, at least as appears to the lay-man,  'global' but organized on some kind of various Continental organizations so that there is always some enemy or reason for the spending and internal control mechanisms. There are a lot of "useful idiots," as attributed (with no sourcing) too, as Lenin said.

Right, albrecht, only a conspiracy nut would believe in the black helicopters of the New World Order dominating the globe right out in the open. Sensible people would understand that only a secret cabal of super-powerful power brokers, like the Consortium on X-Files or the Illuminati could ever hope to keep the entire world under its thumb.

Man alive, some people seem desperate for some kind of order, any kind of order, in what appears to be an increasingly chaotic world. A world so overfed with information, it doesn't know what to do with it except panic. Why not just follow your gut instinct on all this and vote for Trump? He's rich, he's powerful and he probably knows the Consortium members already, even if they've never shown him the secret handshake.

At least we'd have a guy we know and trust sitting at the big table, fighting for America. Just get off the fence and go for it. So many real Americans have pledged their allegiance to Trump already.

[The King of Kings]

Trump is a disgusting pig and should withdraw from this election cycle immediately after he apologizes to the American people for being such a national  embarrassment.

ah, is little baby upset no one cares about Ted Crud anymore?

Does baby need his bottle?

[akwilly]

I just got a new phone so this is a test. I hate politics and the best reason I can give is when I commented on a trump post MV did. I gave my opinion and his response was that he had nothing to say to me. Politics is the great divider.

[akwilly]

If I were to give MV some advice I would suggest he boils his wife's tit juice so his baby doesn't grow up to be a terrorist.

[SciFiAuthor]

I honestly want all people to get along. And also like "diversity." Not the in the PC way but in the real way that countries, nations, people, family, friends, language, culture, religions, etc can have their own ways. It makes the world and travel more interesting and, I think, more peaceful. Forcing "diversity" via open-borders or international demands (or more on a local basis to schools, jobs, or even government- without regard to performance or qualifications of the individual? Crazy.) I do, though, find odd, that is is ONLY "western" areas that are demanded to be "diverse," have no borders, accept "refugees," change their laws and culture to "accommodate." Odd, that.

I agree, I like natural human diversity. I love the fact that there are still uncontacted stone age tribes in the Amazon and South Asia. I like exploring other cultures by visiting their countries, trying to learn their language, going off the beaten path and really trying to get a feel for who they are. I believe in judging people by their character rather than their skin color, sex or orientation. I'm very much a live and let live type of guy. But I do have limits, just as I would like to preserve tribal cultures in the Amazon, I'd also like to preserve European cultures which are just as ancient and have achieved levels of civilization unprecedented in human history. Multiculturalism works against that. I don't have any problems with immigration, but I do believe in integration into the culture that a person immigrates to. If I moved to Ecuador, I would learn Spanish and become an Ecuadorian. I think that's reasonable. I think it's also reasonable to ask that of people moving here. I do believe in religious freedom, but I also know that religions are not races, they are merely collections of ideas, some of which can be very bad and very violent and I think it's perfectly reasonable and sane to bar people from immigrating on that basis. I do not believe in importing other culture's social problems.

But, that's not the world we live in. In the US, immigration policy boils down to two special interests. On the Democrat side, they want to import voters so they can eventually take over the country and rule with a one party system with no viable challengers. They want a corrupt dictatorship of liberalism. On the Republican side, they want to import cheap labor that can be exploited by the corporations. Neither of these aims are in the interests of the people already here and neither are noble, in fact they are far scarier than anything that Donald Trump has said.