• Welcome to BellGab/bellchan Archive.
 

President Donald J. Trump

Started by The General, February 10, 2011, 11:33:34 PM

Dr. MD MD

Quote from: SciFiAuthor on March 03, 2017, 11:27:58 AM
That's what Kissinger tells us to do, but I think the cat's too far out of the bag. The world's going to be really surprised when they find out that we're actually a bingo club.

Sure, sure...It's just that your Bingo card is the world.  :D

Dr. MD MD

Quote from: TigerLily on March 03, 2017, 11:48:37 AM


The one on the bottom is dying and the one on the top is grieving her, right? RIGHT?!  :D


Kidnostad3

Quote from: (((The King of Kings))) on March 03, 2017, 12:03:37 PM

At least a woman calls you.....



Don't worry, she probably has your phone number too. Just continue to bust her balls and you'll be hearing from her.


starrmtn001

Nasty Pelousy can barely keep from choking on her own hypocrisy.  Heh, heh, this is priceless. ;D
Pelosi, Schumer, and Blunt bestow inaugural gifts on President Donald Trump.  2.20.17.

https://youtu.be/EWy1glAH9lY

Quote from: Robert Ghostwolf's Ghost on March 02, 2017, 10:28:22 PM
the next shoe to drop could be a $500 slipper belonging to Commerce Secretary, Wilbur Ross over his involvement with the Bank of Cypress Cyprus.

FIFM. Damn, I hate when that happens.


Dr. MD MD

Quote from: Robert Ghostwolf's Ghost on March 03, 2017, 12:18:17 PM
FIFM. Damn, I hate when that happens.

You're quoting yourself now? Pathetic.  ::)

SredniVashtar

Quote from: SciFiAuthor on March 03, 2017, 09:42:19 AM
The problem with connect the dots journalism though is that it's unethical. It is invariably a tactic used to back a preconceived notion, in this case Russian influence. This is the same technique people like Alex Jones use, i.e. a preconceived notion that there must be a new world order. That's journalistic pandering to a targeted viewpoint, which is one step away from yellow journalism. You're telling a group of people that you know hold a certain viewpoint what they want to hear. The problem is, that's not journalism. That's weaving a narrative.

Take Chuck Schumer. He directly met with Putin in 2003. That's public knowledge. Now I could take that story, which means absolutely nothing other than some Russian oil company opened a gas station in Schumer's district, and play connect the dots. I could look into Schumer's campaign funding and find Russian connections, or Chinese and Saudi ones as they did with Hillary, because the world is so financially interconnected today that you can find almost anything if you're willing to look for it. Then I could weave a narrative around it through casting aspersion in order to get the eyes of people that don't like Chuck Schumer. I really don't like Chuck Schumer, so I may not consider it unethical to weave that narrative, but what I'd be putting out there was not the truth and that's the bottom line.

That's all this is, and the real tip off is how the net is widening. First it was Trump has Russian connections, then those close to Trump, and it will continue to widen from here on out until the story burns out. In the end, it's just concocting a narrative over things that may or may not have happened Alex Jones style. Give this one a few months and watch what happens.

What a load of balls! Not even nice, clean fresh-from-the-shower balls either. This was running-a-marathon-on-a-hot-day-in-polyester-shorts balls. Your whole post reeked of sanctimonious fucknuttery. If you'd stop being a bloody hypocrite for five minutes you'd at least acknowledge that you'd do exactly the same as the other side in this situation. There's nothing wrong with circumstantial evidence, it's been used to convict people before. If Obama had done a tithe of this you'd want him flayed for it.

You have someone with dodgy hair and an orange face who won't release his tax returns (relying on the legendary cud-chewing stupidity of your typical Yank not to hold him to account), who may have been been - for all we know - relying on massive subventions from the Kremlin to prop up his tottering business empire. He can't even get his story straight about whether he knows Shirtless Vlad or not; one minute he's buddies with him, the next he doesn't know him from Adam. People on the right give Sessions a pass, but he was on fucking oath! If he wasn't sure he ought to have said that he'd have to check, instead of saying 'no'. Unless he's so doddery he really doesn't know, in which case he shouldn't be in the job in the first place. You have another one who was kicked out because he can't get his story straight either. People are entitled to ask, if someone goes to such lengths to conceal the truth, whether there might not be something there to be hidden. You have multiple separate intelligence reports saying there's something squirrely going on and the people are worried that people at the highest levels of The Shite House might be compromised.

Even if they found that Trump had a chip behind his ear and Putin was whispering instructions to him 24/7 you'd all be happy with that (cf. 21stCM) as long as Hillary wasn't anywhere near the reins of power. It's like ancient Athens when the Oligarchy invited the Spartans in to put down the opposition (known as the Democrats, oddly enough). The USA is a case study of a nation in decline and you all make me very cross indeed.

Dr. MD MD

Quote from: SredniVashtar on March 03, 2017, 12:27:32 PM
What a load of balls! Not even nice, clean fresh-from-the-shower balls either. This was running-a-marathon-on-a-hot-day-in-polyester-shorts balls. Your whole post reeked of sanctimonious fucknuttery. If you'd stop being a bloody hypocrite for five minutes you'd at least acknowledge that you'd do exactly the same as the other side in this situation. There's nothing wrong with circumstantial evidence, it's been used to convict people before. If Obama had done a tithe of this you'd want him flayed for it.

You have someone with dodgy hair and an orange face who won't release his tax returns (relying on the legendary cud-chewing stupidity of your typical Yank not to hold him to account), who may have been been - for all we know - relying on massive subventions from the Kremlin to prop up his tottering business empire. He can't even get his story straight about whether he knows Shirtless Vlad or not; one minute he's buddies with him, the next he doesn't know him from Adam. People on the right give Sessions a pass, but he was on fucking oath! If he wasn't sure he ought to have said that he'd have to check, instead of saying 'no'. Unless he's so doddery he really doesn't know, in which case he shouldn't be in the job in the first place. You have another one who was kicked out because he can't get his story straight either. People are entitled to ask, if someone goes to such lengths to conceal the truth, whether there might not be something there to be hidden. You have multiple separate intelligence reports saying there's something squirrely going on and the people are worried that people at the highest levels of The Shite House might be compromised.

Even if they found that Trump had a chip behind his ear and Putin was whispering instructions to him 24/7 you'd all be happy with that (cf. 21stCM) as long as Hillary wasn't anywhere near the reins of power. It's like ancient Athens when the Oligarchy invited the Spartans in to put down the opposition (known as the Democrats, oddly enough). The USA is a case study of a nation in decline and you all make me very cross indeed.

The Russian narrative doesn't work. You can use the same line of 'logic' against the democrats. Oh look, it's working.

-There is no evidence that Russian interference effected the outcome of the election.

-There is no evidence that President Trump colluded with Russia/Putin.


SciFiAuthor

Quote from: SredniVashtar on March 03, 2017, 12:27:32 PM
What a load of balls! Not even nice, clean fresh-from-the-shower balls either. This was running-a-marathon-on-a-hot-day-in-polyester-shorts balls. Your whole post reeked of sanctimonious fucknuttery. If you'd stop being a bloody hypocrite for five minutes you'd at least acknowledge that you'd do exactly the same as the other side in this situation. There's nothing wrong with circumstantial evidence, it's been used to convict people before. If Obama had done a tithe of this you'd want him flayed for it.

That's why I mentioned the "Obama is a muslim" business in the post previous to that one. It's the same thing and it's nothing new.

Quote
You have someone with dodgy hair and an orange face who won't release his tax returns (relying on the legendary cud-chewing stupidity of your typical Yank not to hold him to account), who may have been been - for all we know - relying on massive subventions from the Kremlin to prop up his tottering business empire. He can't even get his story straight about whether he knows Shirtless Vlad or not; one minute he's buddies with him, the next he doesn't know him from Adam. People on the right give Sessions a pass, but he was on fucking oath! If he wasn't sure he ought to have said that he'd have to check, instead of saying 'no'. Unless he's so doddery he really doesn't know, in which case he shouldn't be in the job in the first place. You have another one who was kicked out because he can't get his story straight either. People are entitled to ask, if someone goes to such lengths to conceal the truth, whether there might not be something there to be hidden. You have multiple separate intelligence reports saying there's something squirrely going on and the people are worried that people at the highest levels of The Shite House might be compromised.

It's more like may or may not have been involved with the Kremlin. And that net now widens beyond Trump now that that angle has been exhausted. This is nothing new either, it's simply another red scare. We've seen it before.

Quote
Even if they found that Trump had a chip behind his ear and Putin was whispering instructions to him 24/7 you'd all be happy with that (cf. 21stCM) as long as Hillary wasn't anywhere near the reins of power. It's like ancient Athens when the Oligarchy invited the Spartans in to put down the opposition (known as the Democrats, oddly enough). The USA is a case study of a nation in decline and you all make me very cross indeed.

Mmm, you had an empire and ruled something like 25 percent of the surface of the Earth, were at the top of the sciences, were an industrial manufacturing powerhouse, and you've lost it all in less than a century. Other than maybe the western Roman Empire, I don't think world history has ever seen a nation decline quite like yours did. That said, I consider the entirety of the Western World to be in collapse, including the US, much to the detriment of planet earth because the other ideologies waiting to fill the void after the suicide of the west are vastly inferior.

Quote from: SredniVashtar on March 03, 2017, 12:27:32 PM
What a load of balls! Not even nice, clean fresh-from-the-shower balls either. This was running-a-marathon-on-a-hot-day-in-polyester-shorts balls. Your whole post reeked of sanctimonious fucknuttery. If you'd stop being a bloody hypocrite for five minutes you'd at least acknowledge that you'd do exactly the same as the other side in this situation. There's nothing wrong with circumstantial evidence, it's been used to convict people before. If Obama had done a tithe of this you'd want him flayed for it.

You have someone with dodgy hair and an orange face who won't release his tax returns (relying on the legendary cud-chewing stupidity of your typical Yank not to hold him to account), who may have been been - for all we know - relying on massive subventions from the Kremlin to prop up his tottering business empire. He can't even get his story straight about whether he knows Shirtless Vlad or not; one minute he's buddies with him, the next he doesn't know him from Adam. People on the right give Sessions a pass, but he was on fucking oath! If he wasn't sure he ought to have said that he'd have to check, instead of saying 'no'. Unless he's so doddery he really doesn't know, in which case he shouldn't be in the job in the first place. You have another one who was kicked out because he can't get his story straight either. People are entitled to ask, if someone goes to such lengths to conceal the truth, whether there might not be something there to be hidden. You have multiple separate intelligence reports saying there's something squirrely going on and the people are worried that people at the highest levels of The Shite House might be compromised.

Even if they found that Trump had a chip behind his ear and Putin was whispering instructions to him 24/7 you'd all be happy with that (cf. 21stCM) as long as Hillary wasn't anywhere near the reins of power. It's like ancient Athens when the Oligarchy invited the Spartans in to put down the opposition (known as the Democrats, oddly enough). The USA is a case study of a nation in decline and you all make me very cross indeed.

To start off, this post is an overly-emotional diatribe, well-written but rife with speculation.

"There's nothing wrong with circumstantial evidence, it's been used to convict people before. If Obama had done a tithe of this you'd want him flayed for it."

What crime was committed? There has to be a crime before a trial. What evidence would that be besides Trump saying that he admired Putin?  Big freaking deal. 

"You have someone with dodgy hair and an orange face who won't release his tax returns (relying on the legendary cud-chewing stupidity of your typical Yank not to hold him to account), who may have been been - for all we know - relying on massive subventions from the Kremlin to prop up his tottering business empire."

Oh dear, go for the cheap shot why don't you?  He is under no law to release his tax returns. That's the way it works over here. Sorry you don't find it to your liking.  Then you top it off by engaging in wild speculation that would not hold up in any court.

"People on the right give Sessions a pass, but he was on fucking oath!"

And Sessions told the truth.  Franken asked Sessions if he met with the Russians under the auspices of the campaign.  He said, no he didn't. He only met with the Russian ambassador under the auspices of his Senate duties.  All senators meet with all sorts of foreign dignataries during the course of a work year.  It is part of their job. 

"You have multiple separate intelligence reports saying there's something squirrely going on and the people are worried that people at the highest levels of The Shite House might be compromised."


Can you post those intelligence reports and what they alleged?  Anybody can allege anything.  I can allege that you are the most well-mannered Brit that I have ever chatted with.  Unfortunately, that would be way off base.  Where's the beef ie the smoking gun?


As for your last few statements, that sounds like wishful thinking on your part.

SciFiAuthor

Quote from: Dr. MD MD on March 03, 2017, 12:04:23 PM
Sure, sure...It's just that your Bingo card is the world.  :D

No, the bingo is just for fun. When we determine the course of world affairs at the meetings, we normally decide it over a game of Twister and a shitload of vodka. Kissinger's getting a bit long in the tooth for Twister though.

starrmtn001

Okay!  Time for a little comic relief. ;) ;D
The Best of Nancy Pelosi. Seriously. It's the best we could do.  1.1.17.

https://youtu.be/LH2VYne6rSE

Dr. MD MD

Quote from: SciFiAuthor on March 03, 2017, 12:59:20 PM
No, the bingo is just for fun. When we determine the course of world affairs at the meetings, we normally decide it over a game of Twister and a shitload of vodka. Kissinger's getting a bit long in the tooth for Twister though.

And you're not afraid that Trump's coming to smash you mutherfuckers?

SciFiAuthor

Quote from: Dr. MD MD on March 03, 2017, 01:02:30 PM
And you're not afraid that Trump's coming to smash you mutherfuckers?

We replaced him with a body double. People wonder what the hell happened to Hoagland ... plastic surgery and orange hair dye is what happened.

starrmtn001

One of the things I don't like about this thread is seeing people I like, fighting with each other. :'(

Is it possible to trash the politician without trashing each other? :-*

Dr. MD MD

Quote from: SciFiAuthor on March 03, 2017, 01:04:51 PM
We replaced him with a body double. People wonder what the hell happened to Hoagland ... plastic surgery and orange hair dye is what happened.

Makes sense. He's always been a NASA insider and we know they hold ALL the cards.  ;)

Dr. MD MD

Quote from: StarrMountain® 2010 on March 03, 2017, 01:06:20 PM
One of the things I don't like about this thread is seeing people I like, fighting with each other. :'(

Is it possible to trash the politician without trashing each other? :-*

Probably not. Libtards these days can't help taking it personal usually. They got nowhere else to go!  ;)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T575Pbo4eWM


SciFiAuthor

Quote from: Dr. MD MD on March 03, 2017, 01:07:40 PM
Makes sense. He's always been a NASA insider and we know they hold ALL the cards.  ;)

Correction, the aliens that control NASA hold all the cards. Which is easy for them, seeing as how they have 8 arms. Good jugglers too.

Dr. MD MD

Quote from: SciFiAuthor on March 03, 2017, 01:11:01 PM
Correction, the aliens that control NASA hold all the cards. Which is easy for them, seeing as how they have 8 arms. Good jugglers too.

I can accept all that but I'm still just amazed that you were able to tame Hoagie's hair.  :o

SciFiAuthor

Quote from: Dr. MD MD on March 03, 2017, 01:12:32 PM
I can accept all that but I'm still just amazed that you were able to tame Hoagie's hair.  :o

Nothing lies outside our power. Nothing. Well, unless an asteroid hits us or something. Then we're fucked.


aldousburbank

So far the most worrisome thing about Trump's presidency is that mainstraim media commentators generally gave his speech to congress thumbs up. 

Quote from: StarrMountain® 2010 on March 03, 2017, 01:06:20 PM
One of the things I don't like about this thread is seeing people I like, fighting with each other. :'(

Is it possible to trash the politician without trashing each other? :-*

I try not to go there. I like most of the folks here that are on the other side politically. On this whole Trump-Russia business, I can't help but think that most of the people who are more likely to believe that there is something to it already dislike Trump with a passion and are just looking for stories to validate their opinions.  They are ready to believe anything that may diminish Trump.  I'll call out Trump when he does something I don't like but this whole Russian business is just silly.

Quote from: aldousburbank on March 03, 2017, 01:17:37 PM
So far the most worrisome thing about Trump's presidency is that mainstraim media commentators generally gave his speech to congress thumbs up.


That worried me too. lol.

Yorkshire pud

Quote from: 21st Century Man on March 03, 2017, 12:58:40 PM


And Sessions told the truth.  Franken asked Sessions if he met with the Russians under the auspices of the campaign.  He said, no he didn't. He only met with the Russian ambassador under the auspices of his Senate duties.  All senators meet with all sorts of foreign dignataries during the course of a work year.  It is part of their job. 

Nope. The question was this:

Quote
Franked asked, "If there is any evidence that anyone affiliated with the Trump campaign communicated with the Russian government in the course of this campaign, what will you do?"

A general question about anyone.

Answered this:

Quote
Sessions replied, "Senator Franken, I'm not aware of any of those activities. I have been called a surrogate, a time or two in that campaign, and I did not have communications with the Russians. And I'm unable to comment on it."

A reasonable answer would be; "I'd inform the FBI and give them all assistance in their inquiries".

He answered as if it were an ongoing investigation and he might be a suspect. And he lied; He had had communications with the Russians. Twice.

Quote from: Yorkshire Pud on March 03, 2017, 01:25:44 PM
Nope. The question was this:

A general question about anyone.

Answered this:

A reasonable answer would be; "I'd inform the FBI and give them all assistance in their inquiries".

He answered as if it were an ongoing investigation and he might be a suspect. And he lied; He had had communications with the Russians. Twice.

He was meeting with him under his duties as a Senator.  Had nothing to do with the campaign as I've repeatedly said.  Yes, Sessions worked on Trump's campaign but his main job until this February was his job as Senator.

In a separate questionnaire, Sessions more directly denied personally contacting any Russian officials regarding the 2016 election.

Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., asked: "Several of the President-elect’s nominees or senior advisers have Russian ties. Have you been in contact with anyone connected to any part of the Russian government about the 2016 election, either before or after election day?"

Sessions responded, in total: "No."

Powered by SMFPacks Menu Editor Mod