• Welcome to BellGab/bellchan Archive.
 

President Donald J. Trump

Started by The General, February 10, 2011, 11:33:34 PM

TigerLily

Quote from: StarrMountain® 2010 on March 03, 2017, 01:06:20 PM
One of the things I don't like about this thread is seeing people I like, fighting with each other. :'(

Is it possible to trash the politician without trashing each other? :-*

Apparently not. But hey!

Yorkshire pud

Quote from: 21st Century Man on March 03, 2017, 01:28:13 PM
He was meeting with him under his duties as a Senator.  Had nothing to do with the campaign as I've repeatedly said.

But he didn't say that. He didn't answer the question asked.

TigerLily

Quote from: SredniVashtar on March 03, 2017, 12:27:32 PM
What a load of balls! Not even nice, clean fresh-from-the-shower balls either. This was running-a-marathon-on-a-hot-day-in-polyester-shorts balls. Your whole post reeked of sanctimonious fucknuttery. If you'd stop being a bloody hypocrite for five minutes you'd at least acknowledge that you'd do exactly the same as the other side in this situation. There's nothing wrong with circumstantial evidence, it's been used to convict people before. If Obama had done a tithe of this you'd want him flayed for it.

You have someone with dodgy hair and an orange face who won't release his tax returns (relying on the legendary cud-chewing stupidity of your typical Yank not to hold him to account), who may have been been - for all we know - relying on massive subventions from the Kremlin to prop up his tottering business empire. He can't even get his story straight about whether he knows Shirtless Vlad or not; one minute he's buddies with him, the next he doesn't know him from Adam. People on the right give Sessions a pass, but he was on fucking oath! If he wasn't sure he ought to have said that he'd have to check, instead of saying 'no'. Unless he's so doddery he really doesn't know, in which case he shouldn't be in the job in the first place. You have another one who was kicked out because he can't get his story straight either. People are entitled to ask, if someone goes to such lengths to conceal the truth, whether there might not be something there to be hidden. You have multiple separate intelligence reports saying there's something squirrely going on and the people are worried that people at the highest levels of The Shite House might be compromised.

Even if they found that Trump had a chip behind his ear and Putin was whispering instructions to him 24/7 you'd all be happy with that (cf. 21stCM) as long as Hillary wasn't anywhere near the reins of power. It's like ancient Athens when the Oligarchy invited the Spartans in to put down the opposition (known as the Democrats, oddly enough). The USA is a case study of a nation in decline and you all make me very cross indeed.

Ah. SV. I love it when he hates  :-*

Yorkshire pud

Quote from: TigerLily on March 03, 2017, 01:33:31 PM
Ah. SV. I love it when he hates  :-*

I love him always. But hate it when he loves others.

Quote from: Yorkshire Pud on March 03, 2017, 01:33:16 PM
But he didn't say that. He didn't answer the question asked.

Well, let me add this to the mix.

In a separate questionnaire, Sessions more directly denied personally contacting any Russian officials regarding the 2016 election.

Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., asked: "Several of the President-elect’s nominees or senior advisers have Russian ties. Have you been in contact with anyone connected to any part of the Russian government about the 2016 election, either before or after election day?"

Sessions responded, in total: "No."

Kidnostad3

Quote from: aldousburbank on March 03, 2017, 01:17:37 PM
So far the most worrisome thing about Trump's presidency is that mainstraim media commentators generally gave his speech to congress thumbs up.

It's a ruse.  They will acknowledge one obviously positive thing in order to lend legitimacy to the twenty negative things they will try to hang on him by unfounded implications and innuendo.  Keep your powder dry brother.

starrmtn001

Quote from: TigerLily on March 03, 2017, 01:31:34 PM
Apparently not. But hey!
Well yeah, there's that.  What was I thinkin'? :-[

Dr. MD MD

Quote from: TigerLily on March 03, 2017, 01:31:34 PM
Apparently not. But hey!

Sometimes certain people just gotta trash dead people and the people grieving them.  :-\

GravitySucks

Quote from: Yorkshire Pud on March 02, 2017, 04:02:06 PM
Its just successive layers of the same onion.. I doubt most of what the FBI uncover will be made public; but it might result in some sleepless nights ahead by some. There's apparently the interview of Chris Steel being considered. I suppose they'd need to find out where he's hiding first. :)

So, Christopher Steele is credited with the dossier...

1. It could be a fabrication on his part

2. It could be a fabrication on the part of his Russian contacts.

Pick one... Why would the Russians be trying to embarrass Trump and derail his campaign? I thought that was what they were trying to do with the Clinton campaign.

My money is on number 1. He was funded by Never Trumpers and was providing them what they wanted.

SredniVashtar

Quote from: Kidnostad3 on March 03, 2017, 01:36:29 PM
It's a ruse.  They will acknowledge one obviously positive thing in order to lend legitimacy to the twenty negative things they will try to hang on him by unfounded implications and innuendo.  Keep your powder dry brother.

By the way, as someone who's spent some considerable time being abusive to you, I was rather hurt that I wasn't accused of leaving you insulting messages. If I wasn't the prime suspect I could at least have been hauled in for questioning. It makes me feel a little left out, that's all. I wish I hadn't bothered.

Anyway, we all know it was a false flag. You got your nurse to place the call while she was changing your diaper, to try and shame those nasty leftists.

Dr. MD MD

Quote from: GravitySucks on March 03, 2017, 01:39:44 PM
So, Christopher Steele is credited with the dossier...

1. It could be a fabrication on his part

2. It could be a fabrication on the part of his Russian contacts.

Pick one... Why would the Russians be trying to embarrass Trump and derail his campaign? I thought that was what they were trying to do with the Clinton campaign.

My money is on number 1. He was funded by Never Trumpers and was providing them what they wanted.

HaHa! A chode-hauling British spook. Definitely 100% unadulterated BS!  ;D

GravitySucks

Quote from: SredniVashtar on March 03, 2017, 01:39:48 PM
By the way, as someone who's spent some considerable time being abusive to you, I was rather hurt that I wasn't accused of leaving you insulting messages. If I wasn't the prime suspect I could at least have been hauled in for questioning. It makes me feel a little left out, that's all. I wish I hadn't bothered.

Anyway, we all know it was a false flag. You got your nurse to place the call while she was changing your diaper, to try and shame those nasty leftists.

They have been working on the Irregular Rendition order for some weeks. There is infighting between the USDA, Customs and the CDC as far as duration and location of the polecat ferret quarantine protocol.

SredniVashtar

Quote from: GravitySucks on March 03, 2017, 01:39:44 PM
Pick one... Why would the Russians be trying to embarrass Trump and derail his campaign?

Quite often in politics, if someone is granted a favour, it gets forgotten later on when that person is in a position of power (see Tony Blair and Gordon Brown). It's quite reasonable to see these leaks as a yank on the string to let Trump know that he's got to play ball.

Yorkshire pud

Quote from: Kidnostad3 on March 03, 2017, 01:36:29 PM
It's a ruse.  They will acknowledge one obviously positive thing in order to lend legitimacy to the twenty negative things they will try to hang on him by unfounded implications and innuendo.  Keep your powder dry brother.

Lol.. none so sore as a sore winner. At least you believe what Trump tells you. He'll be gratified.

GravitySucks

Quote from: SredniVashtar on March 03, 2017, 01:44:32 PM
Quite often in politics, if someone is granted a favour, it gets forgotten later on when that person is in a position of power (see Tony Blair and Gordon Brown). It's quite reasonable to see these leaks as a yank on the string to let Trump know that he's got to play ball.

I could believe that if it had been disclosed after the election. If they wanted him to win, it would be counterproductive to release it ahead of the election.

Dr. MD MD

Quote from: Yorkshire Pud on March 03, 2017, 01:45:01 PM
Lol.. none so sore as a sore winner. At least you believe what Trump tells you. He'll be gratified.

I doubt any of us "just believe what Trump tells us." However, as surely as your wife is being boned by caiphate loving Muslims, you surely just believe whatever your queen tells you, you pompous faggot!  ::)

Quote from: 21st Century Man on March 03, 2017, 01:23:28 PM

That worried me too. lol.

Quote from: aldousburbank on March 03, 2017, 01:17:37 PM
So far the most worrisome thing about Trump's presidency is that mainstraim media commentators generally gave his speech to congress thumbs up.

Why?

SredniVashtar

Quote from: Dr. MD MD on March 03, 2017, 01:47:44 PM
I doubt any of us "just believe what Trump tells us." However, as surely as your wife is being boned by caiphate loving Muslims, you surely just believe whatever your queen tells you, you pompous faggot!  ::)

You'll bow before the Queen soon enough, but we can't guarantee you'll get back up again. It can be quite tricky after someone's just sawn your legs off.

TigerLily

Quote from: Yorkshire Pud on March 03, 2017, 01:35:10 PM
I love him always. But hate it when he loves others.

I don't think you have to worry much

Quote from: (((The King of Kings))) on March 03, 2017, 01:49:21 PM
Why?

Isn't it obvious?  If the mainstream media likes it, then there's gotta be something wrong with the speech. 

SredniVashtar

Quote from: TigerLily on March 03, 2017, 01:50:28 PM
I don't think you have to worry much

I'm sure there must be someone masculine in the vicinity you could be making a sandwich for, rather than indulging in all this mouthing off. Easy on the salsa.

Dr. MD MD

Quote from: SredniVashtar on March 03, 2017, 01:50:01 PM
You'll bow before the Queen soon enough, but we can't guarantee you'll get back up again. It can be quite tricky after someone's just sawn your legs off.

Cowering in your gnat-infested hovel won't save you. Sooner or later we're going to have to invade you for your own good. Then we'll use you as jihadi fodder.  ;)

Yorkshire pud

Quote from: GravitySucks on March 03, 2017, 01:46:10 PM
I could believe that if it had been disclosed after the election. If they wanted him to win, it would be counterproductive to release it ahead of the election.

Putin wanted him to win, but probably didn't expect him to. Hence the hacking of the DMC and the revelations it had taken place and contents. Trump did win though, and now attacking Clinton is pointless. Trump has put a good proportion of Russian connected people in his cabinet. Including a guy who is the VP of a Russian owned bank.

WildCard

Quote from: Kidnostad3 on March 03, 2017, 11:43:57 AM


Bitch, you ain't gonna squeeze Charmin.
First you're playing the senior citizen victim card, next you're some kind of bad ass.
Make up your sorry excuse of a mind.

Dr. MD MD

Quote from: 21st Century Man on March 03, 2017, 01:52:28 PM
Isn't it obvious?  If the mainstream media likes it, then there's gotta be something wrong with the speech.

I think it was a tone thing and they're all responding to the way he said what he said and not what he actually said so much. They never get it right.  ;)

Dr. MD MD

Quote from: WildCard on March 03, 2017, 01:55:47 PM
Bitch, you ain't gonna squeeze Charmin.
First you're playing the senior citizen victim card, next you're some kind of bad ass.
Make up your sorry excuse of a mind.

Here's your stalker, kid.  ;)

SredniVashtar

Quote from: GravitySucks on March 03, 2017, 01:46:10 PM
I could believe that if it had been disclosed after the election. If they wanted him to win, it would be counterproductive to release it ahead of the election.

It seemed to work pretty well for the Russians. Trump never said a word about them, he sounded too scared. That tweet about Putin being 'very smart' ought to have made sensible people toss their cookies, it was revoltingly servile. There might be a collusive relationship but that doesn't necessarily mean it's cosy. Carrot and stick.

SredniVashtar

Quote from: Dr. MD MD on March 03, 2017, 01:54:53 PM
Cowering in your gnat-infested hovel won't save you. Sooner or later we're going to have to invade you for your own good. Then we'll use you as jihadi fodder.  ;)

Just for that we're going to use a rusty saw.

Kidnostad3

Quote from: SredniVashtar on March 03, 2017, 01:39:48 PM
By the way, as someone who's spent some considerable time being abusive to you, I was rather hurt that I wasn't accused of leaving you insulting messages. If I wasn't the prime suspect I could at least have been hauled in for questioning. It makes me feel a little left out, that's all. I wish I hadn't bothered.

Anyway, we all know it was a false flag. You got your nurse to place the call while she was changing your diaper, to try and shame those nasty leftists.

Nah you're definitely not a dyke.  You're just a fairy princess with Tourette's Syndrom.  Perfectly harmless.

aldousburbank

Quote from: WildCard on March 03, 2017, 01:55:47 PM
Bitch, you ain't gonna squeeze Charmin.
First you're playing the senior citizen victim card, next you're some kind of bad ass.
Make up your sorry excuse of a mind.

Can't it be both?


Powered by SMFPacks Menu Editor Mod