Hillary Clinton

[mikuthing01]

https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton/status/790710757172383745

Thats some pretty sweet snow camo #MAGA

[Kidnostad3]

No our Founders recognized that with relative freedom, capitalism, and a democratic representative republic that ethics and morality also need to be involved to function well, not become corrupt, or not lost.

So I'm not a liberal right?  Hey, by the way, what happened to the Nats this year?  I thought they were supposed to have a ball club.

[albrecht]

https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton/status/790710757172383745

Ha, but the hat doesn't cover the ears so the EMF attacks by "them" will still work. Not an effective tin-foil hat. No stamina.
ps: it is interesting that they show the stereotype "UFO" to affix to side. As far as I know it is only the Clinton machine and her associates who discuss UFOs to such lengths. I forget if DCLeaks or Wikileaks but several Podesta emails about UFOs and Billary, Obama, and that crowd even on entertainment shows talk UFOs. Maybe Trump has also? I don't know.

[albrecht]

So I'm not a liberal right?  Hey, by the way, what happened to the Nats this year?  I thought they were supposed to have a ball club.

I don't know you and labels can be suspect or mean different things in different places/situations, especially with the manipulation of the media and public education. So, now, in the USA, "red" is the color supposedly associated with nationalism, capitalism, Republican, or conservatism (as it is known in the USA) and "blue" is liberal (as it is known in the USA,) Democratic, etc which is the exact opposite of what was normally though (Red=Left.)

[chefist]

Man... I was just hanging out in my shop dinking around listening to the local rock station. DJ comes on out of nowhere, rips Hillary Clinton to shreds, plays a hilarious bit about her from SNL and then launches into Muse's Uprising.



...I'm in the most blue pilled part of the country outside of San Fran and the local rock station is pissing all over Clinton out of nowhere.

That's pretty interesting. Where is this support for her supposed to be coming from?

I only hope there are enough people with the ability to extricate themselves from the manipulation of the mainstream media and find information from alternative sources...

This election will be a good test as to the old power structure versus the new...

[Kidnostad3]

I don't know you and labels can be suspect or mean different things in different places/situations, especially with the manipulation of the media and public education. So, now, in the USA, "red" is the color supposedly associated with nationalism, capitalism, Republican, or conservatism (as it is known in the USA) and "blue" is liberal (as it is known in the USA,) Democratic, etc which is the exact opposite of what was normally though (Red=Left.)

Yeah that is an irony alright.  I was just facetiously referring to the Washington Nationals who actually had an outstanding season only to be defeated in the playoffs.  I gathered from earlier posts that you lived in the D.C. area for some time and might be a Nat fan.  I did a jump switch with no seque.  My bad.

[Evil Twin Of Zen]

Yeah that is an irony alright.  I was just facetiously referring to the Washington Nationals who actually had an outstanding season only to be defeated in the playoffs.  I gathered from earlier posts that you lived in the D.C. area for some time and might be a Nat fan.  I did a jump switch with no seque.  My bad.

welcome to bellgab.............

[bateman]

https://twitter.com/danielhalper/status/790621195574120448

[chefist]

https://twitter.com/danielhalper/status/790621195574120448

WTF is she doing?

[Kidnostad3]

WTF is she doing?

She's blowing her nose in her scarf.

[Astrid Galactic]

WTF is she doing?

Don't know but it looks to me like she's cold and trying to stay warm while catching up on some notes.

[chefist]

https://twitter.com/WDFx2EU7/status/790604678702571520

[GuerrillaUnReal]

Anyone else notice the Democrat men who keep popping up in these scandals always look super femmy?

[Richard Groyper]

Anyone else notice the Democrat men who keep popping up in these scandals always look super femmy?

Beta cucks: CONFIRMED!

[GravitySucks]

Anyone else notice the Democrat men who keep popping up in these scandals always look super femmy?

Podesta looks like a hybrid.

[RealCool Daddio]

Speaking of looking funny:

https://twitter.com/IMPL0RABLE/status/790723309985865728

[Dr. MD MD]

https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton/status/790710757172383745

It kinda falls flat when the theories turn out to be true, Hillary.  :

[Kidnostad3]

 :

Don't know but it looks to me like she's cold and trying to stay warm while catching up on some notes.

Okay this is the dreaded Andrea Mitchel we are talking about here and she is just a shade to the left of Chairman Mao.  Of course you are correct about what she is doing but that's not derisive and funny.  You are being entirely too reasonable and nice.  You gotta get your snark on Astrid.   

[Donald Noory]

:

Okay this is the dreaded Andrea Mitchel we are talking about here and she is just a shade to the left of Chairman Mao.  Of course you are correct about what she is doing but that's not derisive and funny.  You are being entirely too reasonable and nice.  You gotta get your snark on Astrid.   

[136 or 142]

Christ that was a tortured rationalization.   You seem to be saying in so many words:

A.  Soros makes his money by manipulating currency.

B.  Sometimes this causes economies and regimes to fall but it's not his primary purpose.

C.  Once in a while a corrupt regime will fall but he had no real intention for that to happen.

D.  He's a good guy because he makes corrupt regimes fall on occasion along with some that aren't.

E.   His funding of left wing subversive groups world wide is an apolitical act and not an indication of his true motives.

F.   His manipulation of currency contributes to the welfare of mankind by ruining weak economies which provides them with an opportunity to rise from the ashes which he in no way facilitates.  Any help those countries get is from our foreign aid or the IMF or somewhere other than from George Soros.

G.  His money manipulation should not be regarded as just gambling at the geo financial level but is really a benign and even philanthropic endeavor that builds homes, schools, and factories, feeds people, and generally improves the human condition. 

Soros is a ruthless megalomaniac who has been ruining economies and the lives of people from the time he stopped turning his fellow Jews over to the Nazis.  He has given no more to charity or other good works than any other person with comparable wealth would be expected to give.  But I guess you are entitled to your own perspective and if you see him as a real humanitarian and all around swell guy that's okay with me.  It does, however, speak volumes about your own personal code of ethics.

I wouldn't have a problem with your reply (though I disagree with it) but I never wrote that 'he funds left wing subversive groups' or that he engages in money manipulation (I wrote he engages in currency speculation, the first is illegal, the second is legal.)  Please do not claim I wrote things that I never wrote.  That you did that I think speaks volumes about your personal code of ethics.

[136 or 142]

No our Founders recognized that with relative freedom, capitalism, and a democratic representative republic that ethics and morality also need to be involved to function well, not become corrupt, or not lost.

And yet you support The Trump Thing.

[Donald Noory]

And yet you support The Trump Thing.

He must consider a billionaire abusing his position of power and lording it over women by grabbing their pussies to be highly ethical and moral behavior.

[136 or 142]

:

Okay this is the dreaded Andrea Mitchel we are talking about here and she is just a shade to the left of Chairman Mao.  Of course you are correct about what she is doing but that's not derisive and funny.  You are being entirely too reasonable and nice.  You gotta get your snark on Astrid.   

Andrea Mitchel, the wife of Alan Greenspan?  She's just a shade to the left of Chairman Mao?

[136 or 142]

I don't find anything in what you say that I would take issue with.  First the Lions feed and then the hyenas feed.  Call it a spinoff that some will profit from.  But, how does it help to stand the ruined economy back up.  I have no problem with someone making a fair profit.  I just think at some point there should be some value added.  Shit! That doesn't make me a liberal does it?  Say it ain't so Joe!

I don't know about Kidnostad3 personally (and I honestly don't care) but I do find it more than a little amusing that the only complaints conservatives have about free enterprise is:
1.The Liberal Media
2.The Liberal Hollywood Media
3.When George Soros makes money
4.When The Clinton's make money.

[Jackstar]

you support The Trump Thing.

and, he's a Pole.

[bateman]

[Astrid Galactic]

:

Okay this is the dreaded Andrea Mitchel we are talking about here and she is just a shade to the left of Chairman Mao.  Of course you are correct about what she is doing but that's not derisive and funny.  You are being entirely too reasonable and nice.  You gotta get your snark on Astrid.   

Yeah, yeah. I know. That's just how it looked to me.

Maybe I'll let Ricochet Rabbit take this one. Let him work out some of that energy for good, for once.

[Kidnostad3]

I wouldn't have a problem with your reply (though I disagree with it) but I never wrote that 'he funds left wing subversive groups' or that he engages in money manipulation (I wrote he engages in currency speculation, the first is illegal, the second is legal.)  Please do not put claim I wrote things that I never wrote.  That you did that I think speaks volumes about your personal code of ethics.

Sure you did.  You just use idiotic euphemisms where I deal in plain speak.  When you make specious statements like you always do  it's fair for one to fill in what you have left out.  I won't be a party to your dishonesty.  Did I enclose anything in quotes.  I started out with "you seem to..." which is my honest take.  What I did was point the the non sequitors, hypocracy and self contradictions in your ramblings.

[albrecht]

And yet you support The Trump Thing.

As I've mentioned since the beginning I never watched his shows and still suspect based on some of the behavior, their common friends, similar alleged sexual shenanigans, Hollywood lifestyle, and previous relationship that Trump could've been a Clinton scheme, at least initially. To break the Republican Party as some kind of stalking horse for Billary. But he, maybe due to his ego or maybe due to corruption, illness, and weaknesses of Billary, decided to 'go for it.' But always "Anyone But Hillary" (ok maybe a few exceptions, like Obama, or etc.) So since Trump is the only other possible viable choice, I will go for him. More importantly though, for me, is voting for other offices and only local issues like bond proposals etc. I think Trump is soft on immigration and some other issues but compared to Billary's promises? No choice, even if Trump can make good on a few of his promises she is promising to eliminate the country, basically (no borders=no country.)

[136 or 142]

Sure you did.  You just use idiotic euphemisms where I deal in plain speak.  When you make specious statements like you always do  it's fair for one to fill in what you have left out.  I won't be a party to your dishonesty.  Did I enclose anything in quotes.  I started out with "you seem to..." which is my honest take.

I didn't comment on his donating money to 'subversive liberal groups' one way or the other.  That's your term. I wrote he donates money to groups that advocate democracies overseas.  Are they subversive liberal groups?  Prove it.

As I wrote previously, money manipulation and currency speculation are precise terms and have different meanings.  I suspect you don't know this, because you really have no understanding of what Soros did.

I find the best form of plain speak is using the precise term where one is available.  You're the one trying to pull a fast one here, not me.

Were you one of those here who wrote in defense of The Trump Thing's use of tax writedowns that "liberals and Hillary Clinton supporters are trying to pull a fast one by confusing legal tax avoidance with illegal tax evasion"?

Because that's the exact same type of fast one you're trying to pull here.