George Noory Sucks! - The Definitive Compendium

[Eddie Coyle]

Eddie, the only video I see like the one you described is about some Mormon girl who got hit by a car. Does James himself have an explanatory vid posted?

I just checked his YouTube account for the first time since May, 2011 and apparently he's removed his own disturbing video showing his blackened, gangrenous lower leg. It's nearly as gross as that dead raccoon he wears on his head.

       I feel like an FBI/CIA/NSA employee at the moment, passing off my out of date misinformation. Whoops. Actually, you're better off not seeing it though.

[ChewMouse]

       I just checked his YouTube account for the first time since May, 2011 and apparently he's removed his own disturbing video showing his blackened, gangrenous lower leg. It's nearly as gross as that dead raccoon he wears on his head.

       I feel like an FBI/CIA/NSA employee at the moment, passing off my out of date misinformation. Whoops. Actually, you're better off not seeing it though.

...and I feel kind of like a perverted voyeur for even asking.

Let's pretend this never happened.

[Eddie Coyle]

...and I feel kind of like a perverted voyeur for even asking.

Let's pretend this never happened.

       Avert your eyes other CG members. These posts will self destruct in..five, four,

[Sardondi]

I felt no need to search for anything more than what I saw on his...resume?* blog page?...whatever it was. It was the combination of his hyperbolic immodesty and his decision to use a high-school-era pic of himself that helped me decide I'd already seen plenty of him.



*uber-over-the-top self-descriptions in resumes always make me ask this question about the applicant: "If you're this insanely perfect, obviously incredible being, why the hell do you need a job?"

[coaster]

I was done looking at his site the moment I saw a picture of him humping a dinner roll.

[Widget]

              His YouTube page featured a video detailing how/why is an amputee. In a world of vile, digusting displays...even he reaches new depths. And I still think he's the biggest kook to pass this way. No mean feat.

Who are you talking about? I missed it. Whoever he is, there's some defamatory material posted and I feel bad for the guy. Whoever he is, he should have the right to defend himself from false accusation. Here's a forum that defames his character (considered publishing) and perhaps he should be told directly or determine -- as a non-public figure with a lower burden of proof -- who the individual or individuals are issuing these defamatory comments by publishing them online at this website.

I, for one, feel bad for the guy. Whoever he is. Peace.

[TequilaMB]

AH MAN! ya know what?  This damn stalker dude has me fascinated now... I took a quick look at his/her? site earlier and was like "HAHA" but I just happened back on it and now I'm thinking... is this a joke? who is this person? can't tell but this person seems female to me.  All the angel talk is right up Noory's Alley... a spurned lover of George's past?  Why isn't this person in a friggin institution?

It's a male. Here he is wondering aloud why the police keep "persecuting" him.

Persecution

[MV/Liberace!]

Who are you talking about? I missed it. Whoever he is, there's some defamatory material posted and I feel bad for the guy. Whoever he is, he should have the right to defend himself from false accusation. Here's a forum that defames his character (considered publishing) and perhaps he should be told directly or determine -- as a non-public figure with a lower burden of proof -- who the individual or individuals are issuing these defamatory comments by publishing them online at this website.

I, for one, feel bad for the guy. Whoever he is. Peace.

there was nothing "famatory" about him to begin with, so it's not possible, as i see things, for him to be DEfamed.  this creep was repeatedly sending me stalkish private messages until i put an end to it.

[Eddie Coyle]

Who are you talking about? I missed it. Whoever he is, there's some defamatory material posted and I feel bad for the guy. Whoever he is, he should have the right to defend himself from false accusation. Here's a forum that defames his character (considered publishing) and perhaps he should be told directly or determine -- as a non-public figure with a lower burden of proof -- who the individual or individuals are issuing these defamatory comments by publishing them online at this website.

I, for one, feel bad for the guy. Whoever he is. Peace.

Here's a hint monsignor. LEARN A LITTLE about a place before you make yourself the all knowing oracle. Naturally, you'd love JAMES G(that's his name) because he also offered prolix shite quite freely. I see many a similarity between you two.

          You've been here what, a week? No wonder you're so fluent in German. You pompous, self righteous,ignorant arschloch.

[ChewMouse]

Here's a forum that defames his character (considered publishing) and perhaps he should be told directly or determine -- as a non-public figure with a lower burden of proof -- who the individual or individuals are issuing these defamatory comments by publishing them online at this website.

Just relax, Widget. We defame everyone, even you.

Oh...and making threats to CoastGab members, i.e. "perhaps he should be told [who] the individuals are issuing these defamatory comments", is not playing nicely in our big ol' sandbox.

While I'm at it, criticizing PB's Jorch cartoons can really irritate some of us.

None of this is going to look good on your evaluation. Consider that a little heads-up from The Mouse. The Chew Mouse.

[MV/Liberace!]

While I'm at it, criticizing PB's Jorch cartoons can really irritate some of us.

wha wha what!?!?!?

Consider that a little heads-up from The Mouse. The Chew Mouse.

gets a laugh every time you type it.

[coaster]

Who are you talking about? I missed it. Whoever he is, there's some defamatory material posted and I feel bad for the guy. Whoever he is, he should have the right to defend himself from false accusation. Here's a forum that defames his character (considered publishing) and perhaps he should be told directly or determine -- as a non-public figure with a lower burden of proof -- who the individual or individuals are issuing these defamatory comments by publishing them online at this website.

I, for one, feel bad for the guy. Whoever he is. Peace.

Who the fuck are you? Christ, get over yourself.

[Widget]

At least that guy isn't violating federal law. Or any laws. I can't say that "AB Stream" link and the numerous posts about distributing the intellectual property of Premiere Radio networks is doing the same.  Enough said. Peace. Take care and feel free to ignore U.S. copyright laws as you claim superior status.

[MV/Liberace!]

At least that guy isn't violating federal law. Or any laws. I can't say that "AB Stream" link and the numerous posts about distributing the intellectual property of Premiere Radio networks is doing the same.  Enough said. Peace. Take care and feel free to ignore U.S. copyright laws as you claim superior status.

you've officially entered "douche" status.  congrats.

[Widget]

you've officially entered "douche" status.  congrats.

Thanks! I may enter "douche" status but I never received any communications from one Ellen Lockwood, Clear Channel Communications intellectual-property rights representative. Nor posted links to intellectual-property rights violations. Or posted in forums about sending members electronic copies of Premiere Radio Networks' intellectual property for others to distribute online!

Great. I don't mind being a "douche." I kind of like it! Being law abiding. At least I obey U.S. law! Cool beans! I'm a douche. When I get a cease and desist fax from Clear Channel Communications about how being a "douche" violates the law, I'll sweat it! Nothing like those who have been cited for breaking the law reduced to name calling as they post links to pirated streams and ignored the fair warning received previously.

Please let me change my user name to "Mr. Douche." That would be great! It's not illegal! Unlike what others do...or have you forgotten? I can assure you they didn't. For darn sure.

Peace! And please obey the law! Please. Thank you and good wishes, my friend. Obey the law!

[HAL 9000]

At least that guy isn't violating federal law. Or any laws. I can't say that "AB Stream" link and the numerous posts about distributing the intellectual property of Premiere Radio networks is doing the same.  Enough said. Peace. Take care and feel free to ignore U.S. copyright laws as you claim superior status.

What is it with you and your obsession with copyright law? It just seems a bit weird. Let me do a forensic analysis of your computer(s) to determine if you're a hypocrite. Ever make a copy of a cassette tape? Or receive one? Or a CD? I would find it nearly unbelievable that you have never broken copyright law.

And your "sign-off" Peace is annoying too. Not to the point where my systolic pressure is affected - just, well, loathsome, in a very Miss America/beauty pageant sort of way. I love unicorns and rainbows too, but I don't put it at the end of my posts.

Oy vey...

[The General]

Please let me change my user name to "Mr. Douche." That would be great!

I second this motion. 
All in favor?

[Eddie Coyle]

I second this motion. 
All in favor?

       Hear, Hear! And we get to pick his avatar.

[Darisi]

Widget!  Sounds like 1930's rhetoric straight from Berlin.

[Widget]

What is it with you and your obsession with copyright law?

No obsession. None at all. I find it odd that people who brazenly and openly discuss posting and distributing other people's intellectual property suddenly want to sound innocent. Name calling is all fine and well, but it carries no real weight.

Besides, I like using the term "peace." There's nothing wrong with it. It shows I'm for real.  No, I don't listen to or contribute to illegal streams. I like the "donation" angle. Pay someone for what others own.

If I want something, I have to pay for it in life. That's a real "douche" if I ever heard one. Not stealing what rightfully belongs to others! I admit that makes me a loser in many people's eyes, but so be it. I'd fancy the title "King Douche," with a crown made of a you-know-what! That would be neat! And fitting to my supposed "lowlife standing."

How about signing off with "cool' rather than "peace"? Better or worse? Indifferent? Who cares? What do you think? I both respect and appreciate your reply.

[HAL 9000]

I can't say that "AB Stream" link and the numerous posts about distributing the intellectual property of Premiere Radio networks is doing the same. Take care and feel free to ignore U.S. copyright laws as you claim superior status.

Tommy?

[MV/Liberace!]

I both respect and appreciate your reply.

Yawn.

[Eddie Coyle]

 
        The Peace Corps should sue for intellectual property theft by princess douche.

[coaster]

How about signing off with "cool' rather than "peace"? Better or worse? Indifferent? Who cares? What do you think? I both respect and appreciate your reply.

How about just signing off?

[Widget]

Good idea. Signing off for now. I do like the "King Douche" designation. It has a certain appeal to it. Fell free to call me that.

I admit it's been fun talking to you pirates! I enjoyed it! Nothing like those who violate the law coping an attitude. It's been fun. What anyone says here doesn't bother me one bit. We often encounter those who hold an attitude while being the ones who are wrongdoers. In all their wisdom and name calling, they've failed to realize what they are doing themselves.

No harm, no foul, all. I don't fret what such say. Even from those who've previously received "cease and desist" notices and feel they are better than to obey those. I like the "secret-agent" work in investigating. Nice. Especially when delivered by those who know they are doing wrong, but do it anyway!

Have a great evening, all. Spoken by "King Douche" himself. Remember to "donate" to those running the illegal streams so others profit themselves from the property of others!

"From somewhere out there," As I've heard.

[MV/Liberace!]

By the way... We're talking about a radio show that's broadcast freely and openly over the airwaves. If you're so erect over the notion of copyright law (which I have no reason to believe you know anything about), I'd think you'd pick your battles with a tad more selectivity.

Oh, and the fact that a suit mailed over a DMCA notice does not necessarily mean a law has been broken.

Regarding the stream... I do not run it or host it. I will link to whatever I please.

[PB the Deplorable]

... I find it odd that people who brazenly and openly discuss posting and distributing other people's intellectual property suddenly want to sound innocent.... Pay someone for what others own.

If I want something, I have to pay for it in life. That's a real "douche" if I ever heard one. Not stealing what rightfully belongs to others!...
... I both respect and appreciate your reply.

Here's my reply on copywright laws and people's intellectual property, and being diligent about paying for it, as least what's owned by these corporations.

Banks and credit card companies and brokerages think our financial transactions and information we've entrusted to them to keep confidential is owned by them and they are free to sell it to interested parties.  Same with just about everyone else we do business with.  The stores with those discount cards collect info on our purchasing habits and sell that.  So does everyone else we buy things from, if they can.

Are there any websites out there that DON'T plant 'cookies' to track our movements on line - to use and to sell?  Or our online purchases?  Our credit activity is collected by credit agencies.  Don't even get me started with FaceBook, Twitter, Linked-In, Google, and all the rest trying to track every move we make.  They make a bundle selling that. 

Have you gotten a check for your share from any of these companies, ever?  Do you expect to?  Is it useful to you to have your activity sold?  Do you wonder about all the Personal ID thefts?

But that's all ok.  As long as we don't 'steal' any 'intellectual property' from any of them, right? 

Fuck that.

[Darisi]

Kudos MV

[rangers1919]

Anyone listening tonight? This guest might be the dumbest guest I've ever heard. His premise sounds like the dumberst parody of a C2C show somebody could come up with.

He might expand on it, but hasn't so far. His theory is that the pyramids around the world are there to balance the earth because it would wobble when it rotated. He compares it to a tire shop he worked at as a kid. Spinning a tire you could put just a little ounce weight on the tire and it would wobble as it spun.

LOL, what about the massive geological changes when rocks far heavier than the pyramids fall in avalanches over a couple of thousand years, wouldn't that change the balance?

Before the pyramids Spiderwoman went and created the North and South ice caps to keep the earth in balance. What about the ice ages? Wouldn't that have thrown the balance of the earth off?

Now he's onto ant people. I have to look at this guy's website to see if they are pulling a prank on the listeners. He claims it is the creation story, but also said it is something he believes explains everything perfectly.

[rangers1919]

Never mind he doubled-down. He said that in order to stop the ice at the N. & S. Poles from melting stopping coal isn't the answer, but moving the moon closer to the Earth with rockets designed by the best scientists is the answer.

I haven't listened in a while, but if this is what C2C has turned into, frankly, I'm pumped. The show has been unlistenable for quite a while. I say if the show is going to be total B.S., with an incompetent host, and boring, idiotic repetitive guests  sign up the biggest nut jobs they can find and just turn the crazy up to 11.