• Welcome to BellGab/bellchan Archive.
 

Random Political Thoughts

Started by MV/Liberace!, February 08, 2012, 08:50:42 AM

albrecht

Quote from: analog kid on November 08, 2014, 12:45:06 PM

Hillary is a soulless, blank automaton at this point. When I listen to her talk, I sense no presence of an actual human left in her empty husk.

I'll vote for Hillary over a neocon or a fundamentalist Tea Party candidate though. Even though she's only marginally better than the former.
I like that defeatist enthusiasm, in a weird way, actually! It beats out nihilism or the cynicism "both parties all the same" mantra. A weird, though maybe profound, backwards (not in a bad way) way of thinking. Like some of the defeated Hindoo and Buddahist schools and old "protestant" sects in Europe who walled themselves in. I like it. Go with it and keep us, at least me, updated.



Quote from: analog kid on November 10, 2014, 06:46:23 AM
Yahoo News, the #1 choice for White House fence jumpers.

http://nationalactionnetwork.net/press/statement-from-rev-al-sharpton-regarding-the-resignation-of-us-attorney-general-eric-holder/



                 "We are engaged in immediate conversations with the White House on their deliberations over a successor"




albrecht

“Lack of transparency is a huge political advantage,” says the MIT economist who helped write Obamacare. “And basically, call it the stupidity of the American voter or whatever, but basically that was really, really critical for the thing to pass.”

http://dailysignal.com/2014/11/09/caught-camera-obamacare-architect-admits-deceiving-americans-pass-law/

Quote from: albrecht on November 10, 2014, 12:20:25 PM
“Lack of transparency is a huge political advantage,” says the MIT economist who helped write Obamacare. “And basically, call it the stupidity of the American voter or whatever, but basically that was really, really critical for the thing to pass.”

Of course.

This is not limited to ObamaCare, although that's the worst of it and best recent example.  How else has a political minority of Americans in a Conservative majority country managed to hugely expand government reach at all levels, and empower it intrude into every aspect of our lives. 

Not by being honest about who they are, what they want, and where they want to take the country, that's for sure.  Does anyone really think a majority of Americans want this level of taxation, this level of deficit spending and debt, this level of surveillance, this level of being told what to do and not do by a bunch of bureaucrats. 


Just as one example, do people really want local school policy and curriculum being decided by federal and state government educrats instead of parents and teachers at the school and within the district?  Or has that control been seized due to a 'lack of transparency', which has been 'a huge political advantage' for these people. 


I suggest instead of 'the stupidity of the American voter or whatever', it's really a bunch of ideologues working around the clock like termites - while the rest of us are busy with work, home, family and friends, and have been too busy to pay close attention - chewing away at our country.

Maybe last weeks repudiation of Obama has shown the people are now awake.



analog kid

Quote from: FightTheFuture on November 10, 2014, 06:55:29 AM
http://nationalactionnetwork.net/press/statement-from-rev-al-sharpton-regarding-the-resignation-of-us-attorney-general-eric-holder/



                 "We are engaged in immediate conversations with the White House on their deliberations over a successor"

Yeah, well, I don't see the controversy there. Do I need to be listening to Sean Hannity to understand?

rparna

Quote from: analog kid on November 10, 2014, 06:52:26 PM
Yeah, well, I don't see the controversy there. Do I need to be listening to Sean Hannity to understand?


who's that girl chugging Jack?


Quote from: analog kid on November 10, 2014, 06:52:26 PM
Yeah, well, I don't see the controversy there. Do I need to be listening to Sean Hannity to understand?

Because race-baiters with blood on their hands should always be welcome at the White House?  As long as they are Democrats in good standing.

analog kid

Quote from: Paper*Boy on November 10, 2014, 08:57:57 PM
Because race-baiters with blood on their hands should always be welcome at the White House?  As long as they are Democrats in good standing.

How welcome in the White House do you believe Al Sharpton is based on that press release?

And I'll bite. Why does he have blood on his hands and why does that suddenly and uniquely matter for this one person?

Quote from: analog kid on November 10, 2014, 09:06:46 PM
How welcome in the White House do you believe Al Sharpton is based on that press release?

And I'll bite. Why does he have blood on his hands and why does that suddenly and uniquely matter for this one person?

You just had to ask  :-\

Freddie's Fashion Mart


The Reverend Al's involvement in that horror show should..should, mind you, make him radioactive to any politico. But Caesar Obamus doesn't' concern himself with petty matters such as a few joos being incinerated.

Quote from: analog kid on November 10, 2014, 09:06:46 PM
How welcome in the White House do you believe Al Sharpton is based on that press release?

And I'll bite. Why does he have blood on his hands and why does that suddenly and uniquely matter for this one person?

Al looks for opportunities to start or encourage race riots.  Especially when the targets are Jews, but anytime really.  Freddies Fashion Mart, the Crown Heights riots.  Knowingly ruining lives by promoting Tawana Brawley's lies - including hers. 

He's currently focusing on Ferguson, where he's hoping to add a few more deaths to his record before that plays out.

The guy is a menace, and ought to be locked up.  You want hate speech, hate crimes, look no further than Al Sharpton.  But he's black, and a Liberal Democrat, so he gets a pass.

Just the sort of person Barack Obama seeks out.  He even sent his Attorney General Eric Holder down to Ferguson to help Al out


You know, if the places you get your info from have never mentioned any of this when they've mentioned Sharpton, you might want to ask yourself why that is


analog kid

Quote from: Paper*Boy on November 10, 2014, 11:10:40 PM
Al looks for opportunities to start or encourage race riots.  Especially when the targets are Jews, but anytime really.  Freddies Fashion Mart, the Crown Heights riots.  Knowingly ruining lives by promoting Tawana Brawley's lies - including hers. 

He's currently focusing on Ferguson, where he's hoping to add a few more deaths to his record before that plays out.

The guy is a menace, and ought to be locked up.  You want hate speech, hate crimes, look no further than Al Sharpton.  But he's black, and a Liberal Democrat, so he gets a pass.

Just the sort of person Barack Obama seeks out.  He even sent his Attorney General Eric Holder down to Ferguson to help Al out


You know, if the places you get your info from have never mentioned any of this when they've mentioned Sharpton, you might want to ask yourself why that is

Sharptongharble

I should be seeking out outrage porn over someone I don't care about.

QuoteHe even sent his Attorney General Eric Holder down to Ferguson

Yeah, we should have done nothing about that powder keg. Okay.

You haven't explained what kind of access you believe Al Sharpton has to the White House, which is the point of this outrage porn.




Quote from: rparna on November 11, 2014, 05:01:19 AM
rparna

Great. Piss off.


albrecht

Quote from: FightTheFuture on November 11, 2014, 01:24:42 PM

Will Obama be officiating the Islamist ceremony or simply there as a parishioner? And, of course, I'm sure Christian, or even Jewish, rituals and ceremonies are welcomed in the Mosques across the Caliphate Middle-East and Asia (or even here.)
http://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/National-Cathedral-to-Host-First-Muslim-Prayer-282303401.html

Quote from: analog kid on November 11, 2014, 05:38:22 AM
... I should be seeking out outrage porn over someone I don't care about.

Yeah, we should have done nothing about that powder keg. Okay.

You haven't explained what kind of access you believe Al Sharpton has to the White House, which is the point of this outrage porn...

I see.  So when someone like Al Sharpton incites the mob into a frenzy and gets people killed it's ok, because he's a Lib.  So who cares.  Got it.


When Eric Holder went down to Ferguson, did he try to inject calm and reason?  Did he suggest everyone wait for the results of the investigation?  Or did he do pretty much the same thing Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson do - assume the worst and make things worse by revving up the mob? 

Answer:  he went down there to stir up the crowd during the run up to the elections.  I didn't hear Obama - his boss - or a single Democrat rebuke him.  Instead they featured Ferguson in yet another campaign based on racism (theirs).


As far as Al's White House access, don't you think Obama and Big Media are smart enough to hide that as best they can?  Al's not exactly an insider, but he's not an outsider either.  And he sure likes to talk - try googling 'Sharpton Obama'

One thing sure, I wouldn't be photographed with him (or either one of them, actually).  But there are plenty of photos of the two of them together.

[attachimg=1]





AZ/CO

"Morning Joe" on MSNBC hosts Mika and Joe were discussing (maybe a week ago?) the "Rev's" access to the President and apparently he has the President's ear anytime and comes and goes from the Oval Office frequently.  Valerie Jarrett is the last person the President speaks with every evening before retiring, and she sits in on ANY meeting she wishes to, that according to Chuck Todd's new book.  These two "Advisors" make me feel very secure the direction of the United States is right on track...

VtaGeezer

Quote from: AZ/CO on November 14, 2014, 03:40:24 AM
These two "Advisors" make me feel very secure the direction of the United States is right on track...
He should have sent Jarrett packing long, long ago.  I doubt he gives Sharpton more than lip service and only because he does have influence with the A-A base. But you should be thankful. Whomever Obama is taking political advice from, they're terrible at it. Obama is, hands down, the worst at Presidential politics since Carter.  With decent political advisors, Obama would have been far more successful and then you'd really be upset.  Personally, I wish the likes of Jarrett, Rove, et al; full-time political advisors; could be legally banned from the WH.

AZ/CO

 "With decent political advisors, Obama would have been far more successful and then you'd really be upset."

 

OMG you are right!  Excellent point.  Without the thugs from Chicago and the Clinton-Bush left-overs, Obama might have actually made an impact on our country.  Shudder to think

b_dubb

Benghazi

http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2014/11/21/365803171/house-panel-finds-no-intelligence-failure-before-benghazi-attack?utm_medium=RSS&utm_campaign=news

The GOP crafted a fiction to suit their agenda. Maybe they should get out of politics and get into show business. Assholes.

albrecht

Quote from: b_dubb on November 21, 2014, 06:41:07 PM
Benghazi

http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2014/11/21/365803171/house-panel-finds-no-intelligence-failure-before-benghazi-attack?utm_medium=RSS&utm_campaign=news

The GOP crafted a fiction to suit their agenda. Maybe they should get out of politics and get into show business. Assholes.
And from a non govt funded news agency.
http://news.yahoo.com/un-blacklists-libyas-ansar-al-sharia-involved-benghazi-071405906.html;_ylt=AwrSbDbCBnBU0lkAmcxx.9w4
Tho Clinton et al claimed it was non-AlQueda and "just a spontaneous response you tube."
Then a "bump the head" for not testifying. Meanwhile....lets bring more arms to rebels while we fight former rebels we armed!!! Gotta love it.

b_dubb

Quote from: albrecht on November 21, 2014, 07:50:08 PM
And from a non govt funded news agency.
http://news.yahoo.com/un-blacklists-libyas-ansar-al-sharia-involved-benghazi-071405906.html;_ylt=AwrSbDbCBnBU0lkAmcxx.9w4
Tho Clinton et al claimed it was non-AlQueda and "just a spontaneous response you tube."
Then a "bump the head" for not testifying. Meanwhile....lets bring more arms to rebels while we fight former rebels we armed!!! Gotta love it.
When all else fails blame Clinton. Weak.

albrecht

Quote from: b_dubb on November 21, 2014, 08:00:19 PM
When all else fails blame Clinton. Weak.
I blame Obama (well our fp for quite sometime) but specifically for the failed gun-running Benghazi thing I blame Obama. But Hillary simply because on her watch as Sec State and lame excuse as a "youtube" (whatever happened to that youtubr producer by thet way now) and allowing her people/offices to be used, and abandoned, for clandestine ops. And then some tummy trouble and "bump on the head." But "what does it matter?" Because the rebels, now called ISIL (by us they call themselves IS) so we need to arm NEW rebels to fight them. But important, for Obama due to Sunni sympathies,  to not allow Iran, or Heaven forbid, Assad (who a few years ago with his wife was toast of town and magazines for their liberalism and her beauty) to take out Obama's rebels and Arab Spring Muslim Brotherhood radicals.

b_dubb

Quote from: albrecht on November 21, 2014, 08:38:09 PM
I blame Obama (well our fp for quite sometime) but specifically for the failed gun-running Benghazi thing I blame Obama. But Hillary simply because on her watch as Sec State and lame excuse as a "youtube" (whatever happened to that youtubr producer by thet way now) and allowing her  people/offices to be used, and abandoned, for clandestine ops. And then some tummy trouble and "bump on the head." But "what does it matter?" Because the rebels, now called ISIL (by us they call themselves IS) so we need to arm NEW rebels to fight them. But important, for Obama due to Sunni sympathies,  to not allow Iran, or Heaven forbid, Assad (who a few years ago with his wife was toast of town and magazines for their liberalism and her beauty) to take out Obama's rebels and Arab Spring Muslim Brotherhood radicals.

You do that despite the fact that a Republican led investigation determined the Benghazi scandal was baseless? Do you also believe Saddam was dry humping a pile of yellowcake uranium when they found him?


I blame Emperor Sonny Boy. Bill Clinton handed him a finely tuned economy and a budget surplus. Eight years later the economy was a smoldering pile and spending is out of control.




albrecht

Quote from: b_dubb on November 21, 2014, 08:52:01 PM
You do that despite the fact that a Republican led investigation determined the Benghazi scandal was baseless? Do you also believe Saddam was dry humping a pile of yellowcake uranium when they found him?


I blame Emperor Sonny Boy. Bill Clinton handed him a finely tuned economy and a budget surplus. Eight years later the economy was a smoldering pile and spending is out of control.
Read my previous post with regard to previous FP. But Benghazi gun running and stand-down had nothing to do with Bush. (Others did tho.Iran/Contra esp) But "what does it matter?"

b_dubb

read my linked story - "republican fact finding mission finds the bullshit story you're all worked up over to be well a bullshit story"


Powered by SMFPacks Menu Editor Mod