President Donald J. Trump

[VtaGeezer]

Um, for the umpteenth time, it was not Cruz`s people. The Pac was completely unaffiliated with the Cruz campaign. Cruz had absolutely ZERO to do with it, the Pac`s CEO even publicly stated this fact. However, Drumpf, can not say the same. it is HE who personally attacked Cruz`s family. YUUUUUUUUUUUUUGE difference. Get a clue.

So if Trump's friend's tabloid runs a story on Cruz, it's Trumps doing.  But if a Cruz PAC slimes Mrs Trump with a nude photo to snag the judgmental puritan vote, and he doesn't even disavow it until after the voting. that's just politics with good Christian ethics.  You bet.  You understand that thw word is that this story was spiked by Breitbart and others months ago, but Rafael's classy Utah act made the tabloid types rethink their charity.

[FightTheFuture]

So if Trump's friend's tabloid runs a story on Cruz, it's Trumps doing.  But if a Cruz PAC slimes Mrs Trump with a nude photo to snag the judgmental puritan vote, and he doesn't even disavow it until after the voting. that's just politics with good Christian ethics.  You bet.  You understand that thw word is that this story was spiked by Breitbart and others months ago, but Rafael's classy Utah act made the tabloid types rethink their charity.

Good grief, man! For the 7th time, it was NOT a Cruz Pac. It was an anti-trump Pac. Not affiliated in any way whatsoever to Cruz. If you actually believe that Ted Cruz is dumb enough to be banging all these women while running for POTUS, you're far more naive than even I suspected.

[VtaGeezer]

Good grief, man! For the 7th time, it was NOT a Cruz Pac. It was an anti-trump Pac. Not affiliated in any way whatsoever to Cruz. If you actually believe that Ted Cruz is dumb enough to be banging all these women while running for POTUS, you're far more naive than even I suspected.

It was run to his direct benefit and he was named in it.  He wouldn't condemn it until the desired damage was done.  You're pretty deft at splitting hairs for your boy.  Wise up.  He's about to go down, and not on one of his purported squeezes.

[SciFiAuthor]

What the hell are you talking about? Every week Clinton crushes him in new polls. Trump is sinking, not rising in the polls. Put the kool-aid down, breathe some fresh air. Trump CAN NOT win a general election. Cruz CAN. If we have any chance of defeating Clinton, Cruz is the only one left that can do it.

Cruz wouldn't have won if this scandal turns out to be real. I'll give him the benefit of the doubt, but if it's real you can bet it would have broke during the GE.

[PrairieGhost]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5HE-OItWrAE

[GuerrillaUnReal]

Watching Trump eviscerate his enemies... please Jesus let him liquidate Hilary and Democratic Party after he rekt the Republicans.

[SciFiAuthor]

Watching Trump eviscerate his enemies... please Jesus let him liquidate Hilary and Democratic Party after he rekt the Republicans.

When he goes after Hillary like this, I will be giggling like a school girl. Imagine the scandalous stuff surrounding her that we don't know about.

[GuerrillaUnReal]

MADMAN
A
D
M
A
N

[VtaGeezer]

When he goes after Hillary like this, I will be giggling like a school girl. Imagine the scandalous stuff surrounding her that we don't know about.

First, this Cruz story's got to be proven.  But I remember saying months ago that Trump could probably find dirt on the Clintons no one else had the balls to touch.  Having watched him burn his bridges for almost a year now, I think he really sees almost all politicians as whores who sell out for power instead of wealth (though Clinton Inc did both), and undeserving of loyalty or respect.

The aside from CNN teasing the "The Despicable Trump Strikes Again" line, the MSM is still hands-off the story.  But its topping the Twitter action and they can't ignore it for long.  Trump hasn't even tweeted about it.

[SciFiAuthor]

I think he really sees almost all politicians as whores who sell out for power instead of wealth (though Clinton Inc did both), and undeserving of loyalty or respect.

That's pretty much how I see them too lol. But yeah, we need to see if the Cruz story is accurate or not.

[PrairieGhost]

Hillary Clinton’s campaign paid actors to protest Trumps Rally!

http://abcnews.com.co/donald-trump-protester-speaks-out-i-was-paid-to-protest/

Satire!!!! Move along..

[VtaGeezer]

Hillary Clinton’s campaign paid actors to protest Trumps Rally!

http://abcnews.com.co/donald-trump-protester-speaks-out-i-was-paid-to-protest/

I think abc.com.co is a fake.  There's probably a 'net term for using an "almost" website address to give credence to a phony story, but I don't know it.

[WOTR]

That's pretty much how I see them too lol. But yeah, we need to see if the Cruz story is accurate or not.

How wrong is it that I hope it turns out to be correct?  I don't dislike Cruz in particular- I dislike all politicians equally.  And hopefully the Curz supporters (in particular those who supported him based on his moral, religious beliefs) will feel the correct amount of betrayal and that skepticism will follow them through future elections.

I need more people to join me in my disillusionment (and no, trump has not helped it.)

[Value Of Pi]

Hmmm; makes you wonder what he'd do if the common man or woman got in his way. He's got the means to really ruin someone's day.

Man of the people? Yeah right.

Simple. He'd take things as far as he needed to go in order to get what he wants. Land owners in the way of one of his development projects? Gone. Trump U "students?" Fleeced and gone (we'll have to wait on the court case, but he can always settle it). Protesters who disagree with him? Beaten up and, once again, gone.

How does his track record resemble what might happen in a Trump presidency? It's the spitting image, except magnified a thousand-fold by the power of the presidency. I know you understand this, YP, but I thought I'd shout it for everyone in the cheap seats. Beware the ides of March, April, May, June and especially, July.

[PrairieGhost]

I think abc.com.co is a fake.  There's probably a 'net term for using an "almost" website address to give credence to a phony story, but I don't know it.

Yep, I noticed that after reading the damn thing lol I corrected.

[Value Of Pi]

When he goes after Hillary like this, I will be giggling like a school girl. Imagine the scandalous stuff surrounding her that we don't know about.

Giggling while a presidential election is totally reduced to a Grade D soap opera. That's not your most attractive side that you're showing, SFA. Any other spectacles you'd like to enjoy as a serf in Trump's America? I'm sure he can find a way to keep you entertained.

[GuerrillaUnReal]

Now this story is coming out in multiple places

https://twitter.com/AnnCoulter/status/713472091031347200

Donald Trump Protester Speaks Out: “I Was Paid $3,500 To Protest Trump’s Rally”

[RealCool Daddio]

Now this story is coming out in multiple places

https://twitter.com/AnnCoulter/status/713472091031347200

Donald Trump Protester Speaks Out: “I Was Paid $3,500 To Protest Trump’s Rally”

Good grief, it is just a retweet of the same bogus site.  Is Coulter gonna send a link to the Onion next?

[GuerrillaUnReal]

Good grief, it is just a retweet of the same bogus site.  Is Coulter gonna send a link to the Onion next?

lel I know, I think it's hilarious she took the bait.

[VtaGeezer]

Now this story is coming out in multiple places

Coulter probably fell for the fake website without looking at the bogus address; abc.com.co is NOT abc.com.

From the Go.co website "Using .co allows you to add a global dimension to your web presence!"

[SciFiAuthor]

Giggling while a presidential election is totally reduced to a Grade D soap opera. That's not your most attractive side that you're showing, SFA. Any other spectacles you'd like to enjoy as a serf in Trump's America? I'm sure he can find a way to keep you entertained.

Yes. I want to give Richard Hoagland a reality show similar to The Apprentice, but for bullshit artists. Failed contestants will be fed to an alligator, and extra points are given for hair quality just because I want Gary Spivey to win.

[GuerrillaUnReal]

Don't get me wrong. Even though I'm a Trump supporter, I still wish the worst on Coultier and neo-cons.

She's nothing more than a conservative social justice warrior who spews bullshit and profits off the fallout. The fact that she's this dumb is kecksburg.

[RealCool Daddio]

lel I know, I think it's hilarious she took the bait.

There is definitely a joke in there about giraffes and low hanging fruit...

[SciFiAuthor]

How wrong is it that I hope it turns out to be correct?  I don't dislike Cruz in particular- I dislike all politicians equally.  And hopefully the Curz supporters (in particular those who supported him based on his moral, religious beliefs) will feel the correct amount of betrayal and that skepticism will follow them through future elections.

I need more people to join me in my disillusionment (and no, trump has not helped it.)

I share the disillusionment. The problem with establishment politicians is that they institutionally corrupt. You literally cannot function in that system without what most people would view as engaging in corruption. It's sad.

[Zetaspeak]

Don`t you find it it just a wee bit strange that Trump spokesperson, Katrina Pierson, a person named in the scandal, stated for the record, "Of course the National Enquirer story is 100% FALSE!!!"? Of all people, she would might have an inside scoop and the motivation to confirm this horseshit story.

True, but some will also say Pierson bringing it up on her tweet, even with a denial. Might have even given it more oxygen and attention even before she brought it up. BTW wouldn't the story be 20% present fault if know for sure she's not involved. She is just 1 out of 5. Oh republicans and math 

Cruz wouldn't have won if this scandal turns out to be real. I'll give him the benefit of the doubt, but if it's real you can bet it would have broke during the GE.

I do wonder if Hillary would be somewhat immune to it. The last 25 years pretty much everything has been thrown at the Clintons, from profession to personal, from serious to silly, from credible to absurd. Once you break out the "They killed a dude" story not really sure how you top it? I think attack ads/ negativity work, but I think there's also a line before it just gets muffled (Which I think it's also a reason Republicans failed vs Obama, instead of picking one or two big things, they threw every conspiracy out there, that nothing seems credible) In a strange coincidence, I think Trump has the same strategy, he said so much crazy sh*t and outright lies early on, that he can "slip up" or get caught in a lie, it's not even a story anymore because he's done it so much.

That's also a reason I don't think there will not be much movement in the polls during the general election. I think both Hillary and Trump are such visible candidates, that close to 100% of voters know about them and have an opinion of them. You get a lot more movement with less known candidates who can still impress (poll numbers go up) or disappoint (poll numbers go down) . For better or worse everybody got a opinion on HillaRump. I don't thnk either can win more people over or have an attack ad have people abandon them. The voters know the candidates really well, formed an opinion, and picked sides 

[VtaGeezer]

Giggling while a presidential election is totally reduced to a Grade D soap opera. That's not your most attractive side that you're showing, SFA. Any other spectacles you'd like to enjoy as a serf in Trump's America? I'm sure he can find a way to keep you entertained.

Frankly, I've had it with the "Presidential dignity"  bullshit.   Nixon, Carter, Reagan, Bush, Clinton, Bush, Obama.  We know what 50 years of electing image-savvy candidates has gotten us. I'm about ready for honest-but-blunt with real world smarts over more lying-but-oily-smooth Ivy League lawyering.

[bateman]

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/03/25/ted-cruz-affair-rumors-peddled-by-marco-rubio-s-allies.html

[21st Century Man]

The Enquirer endorsed Trump a while back and this Peter Pecker guy who runs it is out to trash all of Trump's rivals.    If anything, this might cause a lot of blow back against Trump.  There is nothing here folks. Time to move on.

[SciFiAuthor]

Frankly, I've had it with the "Presidential dignity"  bullshit.   Nixon, Carter, Reagan, Bush, Clinton, Bush, Obama.  We know what 50 years of electing image-savvy candidates has gotten us. I'm about ready for honest-but-blunt with real world smarts over more lying-but-oily-smooth Ivy League lawyering.

I've noticed that too. At some point in the 20th century we created this idea of being "presidential" to sort of put up a wall between the man and his image. It's very fake, and if you look into some of the 19th century presidents, they look more like Trump than they do George Bush. A good example would be Andrew Jackson.

[albrecht]

I've noticed that too. At some point in the 20th century we created this idea of being "presidential" to sort of put up a wall between the man and his image. It's very fake, and if you look into some of the 19th century presidents, they look more like Trump than they do George Bush. A good example would be Andrew Jackson.

It both increased literacy, recordings, instant communications, and live 24/7 coverage. We always have had partisan press, partisanship, sleazy politicians (and some good ones,) and non-perfect politicians but, sometimes, in the past certain things were decided to not be printed or broadcast and there wasn't as much instant news (and so need instant news stories.)