• Welcome to BellGab/bellchan Archive.
 

The Clinton Trump Debates

Started by Laughing Gator, September 23, 2016, 07:48:58 AM

Donald Noory

Quote from: SciFiAuthor on September 26, 2016, 08:44:43 PM
Lester blew it lol. Everyone either says he was a bitch that was controlled by the candidates or was overtly pro-Clinton.

Yeah blame the moderator just like Trump will do. Nice spin Trumptard.

Quote from: Donald Noory on September 26, 2016, 08:48:10 PM
Yeah blame the moderator just like Trump will do. Nice spin Trumptard.

Lester was molested.

K_Dubb

Quote from: Dr. MD MD on September 26, 2016, 08:45:59 PM
I'm gonna need more info. What direction was it flying?  ???

Due south


136 or 142

Donald Trump admits he's a cocaine addict "I'm not just a cocaine addict, I'm the only cocaine addict that can make America great Again.  I'm the best cocaine addict ever."

SciFiAuthor

Quote from: Donald Noory on September 26, 2016, 08:48:10 PM
Yeah blame the moderator just like Trump will do. Nice spin Trumptard.

That's not what I think, just what I'm seeing surfing the internet. Nice context and reading comprehension Donald. Personally, I think he was trampled over by both candidates.


albrecht

Quote from: 136 or 142 on September 26, 2016, 08:34:02 PM

Creative destruction is a term from economist Joseph Schumpeter.  His most famous book is Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy published in 1942 a defense of free enterprise written, as you can see, shortly after the end of the Great Depression.
Yeah, who didn't know this? There also were great books and columnists about no more wars anymore due to interconnectedness and European-trade back in the old days. But I have another, widely published book, called "Germany On The Next War" that was a best seller and SAID what Germany "needed" to do. So WWI. Same shit, often the time. Stuff is published, nobody listens, and then after more stuff is written. And Japan kicked our butt, at least for a lot, based on theories about quality control (Deming, etc) that we wouldn't accept (in some areas, some things like chemical etc we already were doing but in mfg especially.)

paladin1991

Quote from: SciFiAuthor on September 26, 2016, 08:50:17 PM
That's not what I think, just what I'm seeing surfing the internet. Personally, I think he was trampled over by both candidates.

Maybe Lester will see it.  Next time, no more Nice Guy Lester.  Expect the Pimp Hand to be in full effect.

It's interesting looking through the news the MSM is hesitating on what narrative to take. It'll be interesting to wake up to what direction they decide to go in.

What's interesting is ultra cuck males are melting down online about Trump winning but they're such defeatist losers that I don't know if that means anything.

The general reaction online seems to be that Donald took the first 1/3rd, Hillary took the last part and that Trump kept getting baited. Hillary came off as scripted, Trump came off as real. I'm not seeing much of a definitive conclusion.

I think the polls are just reflecting Trump's current popularity more than the debate from what I'm reading.

I'm not sure what the conclusion is yet.

136 or 142

Quote from: albrecht on September 26, 2016, 08:50:48 PM
Yeah, who didn't know this? There also were great books and columnists about no more wars anymore due to interconnectedness and European-trade back in the old days. But I have another, widely published book, called "Germany On The Next War" that was a best seller and SAID what Germany "needed" to do. So WWI. Same shit, often the time. Stuff is published, nobody listens, and then after more stuff is written. And Japan kicked our butt, at least for a lot, based on theories about quality control (Deming, etc) that we wouldn't accept (in some areas, some things like chemical etc we already were doing but in mfg especially.)

Creative destruction is one of the most well known terms in economics circles.  If you're going to speak on economics knowledgeably you should certainly be familiar with the term.

Dr. MD MD

Quote from: SciFiAuthor on September 26, 2016, 08:50:17 PM
That's not what I think, just what I'm seeing surfing the internet. Nice context and reading comprehension Donald. Personally, I think he was trampled over by both candidates.

There really weren't many questions challenging her record though. It was definitely softball towards her but Trump still should've been able to direct the discussion to what he wanted to and couldn't do it, for the most part. He needs help from speechwriters at this point.

136 or 142

Quote from: VoteQuimby on September 26, 2016, 08:53:21 PM
It's interesting looking through the news the MSM is hesitating on what narrative to take. It'll be interesting to wake up to what direction they decide to go in.

What's interesting is ultra cuck males are melting down online but they're such defeatist losers that I don't know if that means anything.

The general reaction online seems to be that Donald took the first 1/3rd, Hillary took the last part and that Trump kept getting baited. Hillary came off as scripted, Trump came off as real. I'm not seeing much of a definitive conclusion.

I think the polls are just reflecting Trump's current popularity more than the debate from what I'm reading.

I'm not sure what the conclusion is yet.

Lying, whining and being a bully is what's considered 'real' these days?

Quote from: 136 or 142 on September 26, 2016, 08:50:17 PM
Donald Trump admits he's a cocaine addict "I'm not just a cocaine addict, I'm the only cocaine addict that can make America great Again.  I'm the best cocaine addict ever."

"Cocaine gives me a good brain"

SciFiAuthor

Quote from: Dr. MD MD on September 26, 2016, 08:53:26 PM
There really weren't many questions challenging her record though. It was definitely softball towards her but Trump still should've been able to direct the discussion to what he wanted to and couldn't do it, for the most part. He needs help from speechwriters at this point.

Yeah, I agree. He could have owned this past the first 20 minutes but he got bogged down defending himself.


Donald Noory

I was waiting for Trump to ask Lester for a pee-pee break. He was drinking a lot of water. Like "Little Marco."

136 or 142

Quote from: GravitySucks on September 26, 2016, 08:55:25 PM
https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/780593298247483392

He said on the Howard Stern Show that he would have voted in favor had he been in the Senate.  Not that word for word, but he said he supported it.

GravitySucks

Quote from: SciFiAuthor on September 26, 2016, 08:54:53 PM
Yeah, I agree. He could have owned this past the first 20 minutes but he got bogged down defending himself.

Agree. He should have been this concise.

https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/780594362862362624

Dr. MD MD

Quote from: 136 or 142 on September 26, 2016, 08:50:17 PM
Donald Trump admits he's a cocaine addict "I'm not just a cocaine addict, I'm the only cocaine addict that can make America great Again.  I'm the best cocaine addict ever."

He was friends with the Clintons. He probably learned from them.  ;)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gLWMnH31D-Y

The reaction from the HillShills on here is indicative of what I'm seeing online. These people are desperate for a win and started off screaming about victory a hour ago but since the MSM isn't reflecting this view they're getting into this deepening obsessive psychosis like what we're seeing here on the board.

It's real interesting the MSM isn't banging the gong for Hillary yet from what I'm reading. I'm assuming CNN is losing their shit but I don't consider them MSM anymore.

Quote from: 136 or 142 on September 26, 2016, 08:56:40 PM
He said on the Howard Stern Show that he would have voted in favor had he been in the Senate.  Not that word for word, but he said he supported it.

Trump said "I...guessss"

Donald Noory

Amazing that Trumptards can try and spin that losing performance into a win.

#fantasyworld


136 or 142

Quote from: VoteQuimby on September 26, 2016, 08:57:36 PM
The reaction from the HillShills on here is indicative of what I'm seeing online. These people are desperate for a win and started off screaming about victory a hour ago but since the MSM isn't reflecting this view they're getting into this deepening obsessive psychosis like what we're seeing here on the board.

It's real interesting the MSM isn't banging the gong for Hillary yet from what I'm reading. I'm assuming CNN is losing their shit but I don't consider them MSM anymore.

Only real poll so far showed Clinton winning 51-40.

GravitySucks

Quote from: 136 or 142 on September 26, 2016, 08:56:40 PM
He said on the Howard Stern Show that he would have voted in favor had he been in the Senate.  Not that word for word, but he said he supported it.

Not even close to what he said. And he wasn't a politician. Find the quote for yourself. I'm not doing a Canadian's homework.

albrecht

Quote from: 136 or 142 on September 26, 2016, 08:53:25 PM
Creative destruction is one of the most well known terms in economics circles.  If you're going to speak on economics knowledgeably you should certainly be familiar with the term.
Yes, as I said! I guess the posting makes more money than the reading. Who doesn't know this. (sigh) Economists though are often hilarious, can't even predict better one precise objects that some cute weather-gal or some chimp throwing darts.  (Not that I am saying it is not a worthy study.)

Quote from: 136 or 142 on September 26, 2016, 09:00:06 PM
Only real poll so far showed Clinton winning 51-40.

And what about the fifteen or so polls that I just posted that showed he won?

136 or 142

Quote from: rekcuf on September 26, 2016, 08:57:49 PM
Trump said "I...guessss"

1.He said more than that.
2.If Hillary Clinton blasted the war in her Senate speech for a full hour before voting for it, all anybody would rightly remember was that she voted for it.  Same deal for Trump, he said he supported it, there is no recording of him opposing it.

In another less well known interview he said "maybe this isn't the right time for the war."  At the start of this campaign, I would have given him a pass, but it's clear now he uses weasel words like 'maybe' a lot and he tries to take all sides of nearly every issue.

There is not a single statement where he comes out actually gives a declarative statement opposing the war.

His closest statement on the war is in support of it.

136 or 142

Quote from: VoteQuimby on September 26, 2016, 09:01:53 PM
And what about the fifteen or so polls that I just posted that showed he won?

Those were online non-scientific polls.

Powered by SMFPacks Menu Editor Mod