• Welcome to BellGab/bellchan Archive.
 

Caravan to Midnight

Started by Original Larry, September 28, 2015, 10:36:00 AM

Lilith

Quote from: weedeater on August 26, 2016, 02:53:00 PM
Here is the rub, if I as a member from day one am experiencing cancellation issues as a result of an upgrade and am directed to the new subscription page with the carrot of 3 free months as opposed to renewal at the old rate (renewal seems to be at the new rate following cancellation also).  Anyway, it will soon become a non issue, but I won't bite off my nose and not resubscribe I'll hold my nose and get 3 free months.

Sure.  That way you are getting 6 months for $25.00 worst case scenario.

Kidnostad3

Quote from: brig on August 26, 2016, 12:19:50 PM
I got a kick out of how Wells told Mark to let him know if he gets any breaking news about 9/11,  and he'll get him back on, and get the info out to as many people in the world as he can.  I couldn't help thinking, yeah sure, as long as they have a subscription to CTM.


The breaking news is there ain't gonna be any breaking news.

Did you notice that Gaffney shot down John and Jackstar's pet theory that a missile hit the Pentagon.  He said something to the effect that the impact site was damaged precisely as would be expected from the impact of an aircraft.  I can tell you from personal experience that the damage caused by a cruise missile that would penetrate and then explode would be much more extensive than the impact of an airplane.  From looking at the hole in the A Ring, which I did from about 50-60 yards away a few days after 9/11, it was clear that the initial damage was kinetic and the hole was of a size proportionate to the circumference of an airplane fuselage. Further damage was caused by the ignition of JP-4 within hundreds of a second after impact. . The wings would have collapsed backwards upon the fuselage.


The Pentagon is built like a bunker.  I know because I worked there for 3 years immediately before retiring from the Navy.  If anyone doesn't think that the heavy duty framework and reinforced concrete walls of the pentagon would act like a shredder on a plane crashing into it they are sadly mistaken.  There would be no large parts left to find.  The fact that there is no picture of a plane on surveillance videos is due to the slow speed of the camera.   A neighbor of mine was in traffic on 295 roughly adjacent to the Pentagon probably a half mile away.  The plane that hit the Pentagon passed almost directly over his car and he saw it impact as did many others that day.  Every time I hear John or someone else claim with smug certainty that it was a missile strike I want to grab him by his stacking swivel and shake some sense into him.  PEACE, OUT

Lilith

Quote from: Kidnostad3 on August 26, 2016, 03:03:41 PM

The breaking news is there ain't gonna be any breaking news.  Did you notice that Gaffney shot down John and Jackstar's pet theory that a missile hit the Pentagon.  He said something to the effect that the impact site was damaged precisely as would be expected from the impact of an aircraft.  I can tell you from personal experience that the damage caused by a cruise missile that is set to penetrate and then explode would be much more extensive than than the impact of an airplane.  From looking at the hole in the A Ring which I did from about 50-60 yards away not long after 9/11 it was clear that the initial damage was kinetic and roughly the size of an airplane fuselage followed by fire damage caused by the ignition of JP5.   The Pentagon is built like a bunker.  I know because I worked there for 3 years immediately before retiring from the Navy.  If you don't think that the heavy duty framework and reinforced concrete walls of the pentagon would act like a shredder on a plane crashing into it you are sadly mistaken.  There would be no large parts left to find.  The fact that there is no picture of a  plane on surveillance videos is due to the camera speed.  A neighbor of mine was in traffic on 295 roughly adjacent to the Pentagon probably a half mile away.  The plane that hit the Pentagon passed almost directly over his car and he saw it impact as did many others that day.  Every time I hear John or someone else claim with smug certainty that it was a missile strike I want to grab him by his stacking swivel and shake some sense into him.  PEACE, OUT

Yes, I did hear that part.  8)

ShayP

Quote from: Kidnostad3 on August 26, 2016, 03:03:41 PM
Every time I hear John or someone else claim with smug certainty that it was a missile strike I want to grab him by his stacking swivel and shake some sense into him.  PEACE, OUT

I like what you said, but I really need to know what a "stacking swivel" is.  ;D  I'm trying to imagine.... :o  ;)

Elane237

My membership with CTM was scheduled to expire on September 15. I CANCELLED ON MONDAY AND TODAY I WAS NOT ABLE TO WATCH THE SHOW FROM LAST NIGHT.

Message says your membership and subscriptions end immediately when you cancel...not at the end of your subscriber period!!! Oh well!

AND ... the subscription prices went up.

Capitalism at work, folks!!

weedeater

Quote from: ShayP on August 26, 2016, 03:16:03 PM
I like what you said, but I really need to know what a "stacking swivel" is.  ;D  I'm trying to imagine.... :o  ;)
Sorry Kid, couldn't resist.

weedeater

Quote from: Elane237 on August 26, 2016, 03:21:06 PM
My membership with CTM was scheduled to expire on September 15. I CANCELLED ON MONDAY AND TODAY I WAS NOT ABLE TO WATCH THE SHOW FROM LAST NIGHT.

Message says your membership and subscriptions end immediately when you cancel...not at the end of your subscriber period!!! Oh well!

AND ... the subscription prices went up.

Capitalism at work, folks!!
Elane he got you too.  Punishment for early cancellation on paypal, did not happen before.  You have to love the new upgrade.  Send him an email and you will get 3 free months before you bail.

Jackstar

Quote from: Kidnostad3 on August 26, 2016, 03:03:41 PM
The wings would have collapsed backwards upon the fuselage.

"Ground effect, Sonny," whispered The Sage.

Bomar

Dudes and Dudettes,...

Been through similar subscription issues, all old subscribers are grandfather in at the old rate, cancellation of subscription will institute the new rate...

Looks like the yearly rate remains at $60.00...

But; 6 month $45.00... 3 months 25.00... 1 month $10.00...

.......

Here is a story about subscriptions...

4 years ago I ordered PC World Magazine, filled out all the forms over the phone...

Turns out the company was not selling/subscribing PC World Magazine...

I cancelled my order, got a full refund in less than a week...

Since then, 8/2012, I have received 3 magazines a month, which change every year or two...

I receive no bill...

I called and complained about receiving these unordered magazines and ask to have them stop being sent to me...

I now receive 6 magazines per month...

I have learned to keep my mouth shut, at times...

Bomar

Kidnostad3

Quote from: ShayP on August 26, 2016, 03:16:03 PM
I like what you said, but I really need to know what a "stacking swivel" is.  ;D  I'm trying to imagine.... :o  ;)


A stacking swivel goes back to the days when the order might be given to "stack arms."  This involved standing a number of rifles up on their buts so that they form a cone and are supported by one another.  The stacking swivel is a metal clip device located just above sling attachment at the muzzle end of the stock that connects to other stacking swivels or a lanyard  to hold the stack together.  I think the last rifle to have a stacking swivel was an M-1 which was replaced by the M-16 during the Vietnam War.   I have fired an M-16 for familiarization but I'll be damned if I can remember if it has a stacking swivel.  (Maybe someone reading this can help me with this. ).  Grabbing someone by his stacking swivel  is an anachronistic term that is still used by some in the military.  Sort of like "keeping your powder dry" or someone being a "loose cannon"

Kidnostad3

Quote from: weedeater on August 26, 2016, 03:21:37 PM
Sorry Kid, couldn't resist.


Thanks Weedeater.  A picture is worth.....   I wish I had seen your post before I wrote my long winded explanation. 

And I really like your alliteration. 

PEACE, OUT

Kidnostad3

Quote from: Jackstar on August 26, 2016, 03:37:32 PM
"Ground effect, Sonny," whispered The Sage.




There are none so blind as those who will not see. 

Bomar

Quote from: Kidnostad3 on August 26, 2016, 04:30:40 PM

A stacking swivel goes back to the days when the order might be given to "stack arms"...


Kid,...

Thank you for that explanation...

I assumed when you stated “I want to grab him by his stacking swivel”, you wanted to ring that guy’s neck...

(Stacking swivel being the top vertebra below the skull)...

Bomar

PS: I know, never assume...


Bomar

Quote from: Kidnostad3 on August 26, 2016, 04:56:58 PM



There are none so blind as those who will not see.


Everyone knows, there are 38 basements levels below the Pentagon...

FYI: The Jet went through most of them and landed in the UFO vault...

No wonder no one is talking and nothing was left outside...

And all the wreckage was moved out on the Maglev Train stationed down there...

Bomar

Jackstar

Quote from: Kidnostad3 on August 26, 2016, 04:56:58 PM
There are none so blind as those who will not see.

https://youtu.be/vwzT0QnwtTE

Do you seriously mean to be frontin' to us, that you see a plane here?

weedeater

Quote from: Kidnostad3 on August 26, 2016, 04:39:53 PM

Thanks Weedeater.  A picture is worth.....   I wish I had seen your post before I wrote my long winded explanation. 

And I really like your alliteration. 

PEACE, OUT
See that ugly little red sucker sticking out the back of the atlas, its greed and ego.   ;D 

Bomar

Dudes and Dudettes,...

And now for something completely different...

The movie for tonight: THE GROOVE TUBE (1974), a classic...

Starring:
          Ken Shapiro...
          Richard Belzer...
          Chevy Chase...

Link: http://123movies.net/watch/Nx47pWvz-the-groove-tube.html ...

Enjoy, I know I will...

Bomar

Kidnostad3

Quote from: Bomar on August 26, 2016, 05:11:39 PM
Everyone knows, there are 38 basements levels below the Pentagon...

FYI: The Jet went through most of them and landed in the UFO vault...

No wonder no one is talking and nothing was left outside...

Bomar


Oh, Okay, That clears it up for me. So the plane penetrated the outside wall at a 15-20 degree angle from the ground, changed course after impact so as to assume a steep downward angle sufficient to penetrate most of the 35 floors below the Pentagon (which would have to be an angle approaching 90 degrees) while maintaining enough momentum to penetrate multiple reinforced concrete floors. 

Makes me wonder why we pay to develop bunker busting ordnance that can't achieve anything like that kind of penetration when all we have to do is fly commercial airliners into any subterranean bunkers that we need to take out. 


BOMAR you must be putting me on.

Elane237

Quote from: Kidnostad3 on August 26, 2016, 05:49:47 PM

Oh, Okay, That clears it up for me. So the plane penetrated the outside wall at a 15-20 degree angle from the ground, changed course after impact so as to assume a steep downward angle sufficient to penetrate most of the 35 floors below the Pentagon (which would have to be an angle approaching 90 degrees) while maintaining enough momentum to penetrate multiple reinforced concrete floors. 

Makes me wonder why we pay to develop bunker busting ordnance that can't achieve anything like that kind of penetration when all we have to do is fly commercial airliners into any subterranean bunkers that we need to take out.

ROFL!!  Geeeeezzz!

nooropathy

Quote from: Jackstar on August 26, 2016, 05:12:30 PM
https://youtu.be/vwzT0QnwtTE

Do you seriously mean to be frontin' to us, that you see a plane here?
You are correct Sir...there is no plane, no jet engines, and no fuselage,. 911 was an inside job,,

Jackstar

I'm not clear on how the pair of you find the relentless posting of asinine strawman boilerplate compelling to anyone, least of all, yourselves.

Can you shed a little light on that for us? I would like to get to know you better.

Jackstar

Quote from: nooropathy on August 26, 2016, 05:57:26 PM
You are correct Sir...there is no plane, no jet engines, and no fuselage,. 911 was an inside job,,


See above, re: transparent boilerplate

Kidnostad3

Quote from: Elane237 on August 26, 2016, 05:51:49 PM
ROFL!!  Geeeeezzz!



Look, I've read crazier shit than Bomar's explanation on this very thread.  I don't take anything as being tongue in cheek anymore. 

Kidnostad3

Quote from: Jackstar on August 26, 2016, 05:58:53 PM
I'm not clear on how the pair of you find the relentless posting of asinine strawman boilerplate compelling to anyone, least of all, yourselves.

Can you shed a little light on that for us? I would like to get to know you better.

Yeah Jackstar, it's you John B. and the other silly shits that believe as you do against the world.  I haven't heard you come up with anything that is new or hasn't been debunked six ways from Sunday.  Are we not speaking English here.  The only thing you bring to the table is snarky one liners and an obtuseness that is truly stunning.   I have seen you get your ass handed to you on a regular basis on other Belgab strings.  They usually take your lame assertions apart in detail and in the end the best you can do is tell them that you hope that they get ass cancer an die.   Christ Jack, don't you get sick of being chased back to your spot under the porch.


Lilith

Quote from: Kidnostad3 on August 26, 2016, 05:49:47 PM

Oh, Okay, That clears it up for me. So the plane penetrated the outside wall at a 15-20 degree angle from the ground, changed course after impact so as to assume a steep downward angle sufficient to penetrate most of the 35 floors below the Pentagon (which would have to be an angle approaching 90 degrees) while maintaining enough momentum to penetrate multiple reinforced concrete floors. 

Makes me wonder why we pay to develop bunker busting ordnance that can't achieve anything like that kind of penetration when all we have to do is fly commercial airliners into any subterranean bunkers that we need to take out. 


BOMAR you must be putting me on.

They say that the simplest explanation, is always the best explanation, so...

Lilith

Quote from: Kidnostad3 on August 26, 2016, 06:47:14 PM
Yeah Jackstar, it's you John B. and the other silly shits that believe as you do against the world.  I haven't heard you come up with anything that is new or hasn't been debunked six ways from Sunday.  Are we not speaking English here.  The only thing you bring to the table is snarky one liners and an obtuseness that is truly stunning.   I have seen you get your ass handed to you on a regular basis on other Belgab strings.  They usually take your lame assertions apart in detail and in the end the best you can do is tell them that you hope that they get ass cancer an die.   Christ Jack, don't you get sick of being chased back to your spot under the porch.

Jack never gets tired. He's always ready for a good debate.

Kidnostad3

Quote from: Bomar on August 26, 2016, 05:11:39 PM
Everyone knows, there are 38 basements levels below the Pentagon...

FYI: The Jet went through most of them and landed in the UFO vault...

No wonder no one is talking and nothing was left outside...

And all the wreckage was moved out on the Maglev Train stationed down there...

Bomar



What's  a Maglev Train.  Are we talking about magnetic levitation here?   Like the Japanese have?
I knew it.  The Japanese are behind all this. 





Powered by SMFPacks Menu Editor Mod