More Religion of Death, Destruction, and Oppression...

[Gd5150]

Its always funny to watch libtards conform confirm what we already know they'll say. Mass shooting, blame guns. Islamic terrorism, blame Christianity. Islamic terrorists using guns in France, blame the US and those who don't hate the US ie. Republicans, Bush, Reagan, Palin, FoxNews, Limbaugh, The US, The unconstitutional US Constitution, blah blah blah. Most importantly, never, under any circumstances, blame the Gentle Jihadists.

[GeorgieForPresident2216]

This is our country.  We have every right to decide who immigrates here and who isn't welcome to immigrate here, for any reason or for no reason.  We are not obliged to extend our liberties and freedoms to foreigners outside this country - they have their own governments and laws. 

Not only are we not able to tell which of these people mean us harm, we have ample evidence that a certain number among those who come to the West do.  Or their children will.  The Constitution is not a suicide pact. 

Why import trouble?  Geez, these Libs would have had us giving visas to Nazis during WWII - as long as they voted Democrat and signed up for government handouts.

You have the right to limit immigration.  No problems there even though I think America needs immigrants for its continued prosperity.

You even have the right to racially profile those who come in, but if you do I don't think you can do it under the guise of individual liberties and freedoms, because it is an assault on those beliefs to do so.

Nazis swore allegiance to an enemy of the United States.  Based on the individual merits of a Nazi who swore allegiance to an enemy of the United States they would not be admitted.  ISIS is an enemy of the United States.  Any terrorist group is.  But individuals are not enemies by virtue of being Muslim anymore than the average Christian can be pegged as being extremist.  In fact if you got to know any Muslims I think you would be surprised by their compassion. 

In any case unless you want to declare the entire Muslem world as an enemy, then I don't think you have any right to speak of liberty and freedoms and 'racist progressives' out of one side of your mouth and speak of what amounts to racial discrimination out the other.  Everything has a cost.  Liberty has a cost.  Decide whether you support the values of the American constitution or if you are willing to give that up for the pretense of security.

By the way I'm not a liberal.  I just tend to find Democrats on this site and in general more grounded than those who claim to be conservative.  I don't even think this should be a political left-right issue, but apparently everything in America has to be politicized for some reason.  I guess it is to avoid personal responsibility for anything.

[Quick Karl]

    Yes, trach recipient Alex Jones is doing his "false flag" schtick on his abominable radio show. The expert on warfare, because he watches videos, believes the gunmen's movements were "Western", not what he's accustomed to from the "thousands" of ISIS videos he has claimed to view. And, ya know, West Germany did a false flag in Oct '72 with a staged hijacking so they could release the remaining Munich suspects...so clearly that relates to today.

    But the coward doesn't own any of his comments. He always couches them and uses straw men/devil's advocacy. What a dickhead. He makes Noory seem like Einstein and Murrow rolled into one
   

Who is Alex Jones?

[Quick Karl]

With a rifle? Cake.

With an AK variant.

Spoken like a true wannabe...

[Quick Karl]

Its always funny to watch libtards conform confirm what we already know they'll say. Mass shooting, blame guns. Islamic terrorism, blame Christianity. Islamic terrorists using guns in France, blame the US and those who don't hate the US ie. Republicans, Bush, Reagan, Palin, FoxNews, Limbaugh, The US, The unconstitutional US Constitution, blah blah blah. Most importantly, never, under any circumstances, blame the Gentle Jihadists.

It is a projection of their own guilt.

[PB the Deplorable]

You have the right to limit immigration.  No problems there even though I think America needs immigrants for its continued prosperity.

You even have the right to racially profile those who come in, but if you do I don't think you can do it under the guise of individual liberties and freedoms, because it is an assault on those beliefs to do so.

Nazis swore allegiance to an enemy of the United States.  Based on the individual merits of a Nazi who swore allegiance to an enemy of the United States they would not be admitted.  ISIS is an enemy of the United States.  Any terrorist group is.  But individuals are not enemies by virtue of being Muslim anymore than the average Christian can be pegged as being extremist.  In fact if you got to know any Muslims I think you would be surprised by their compassion. 

In any case unless you want to declare the entire Muslem world as an enemy, then I don't think you have any right to speak of liberty and freedoms and 'racist progressives' out of one side of your mouth and speak of what amounts to racial discrimination out the other.  Everything has a cost.  Liberty has a cost.  Decide whether you support the values of the American constitution or if you are willing to give that up for the pretense of security.

By the way I'm not a liberal.  I just tend to find Democrats on this site and in general more grounded than those who claim to be conservative.  I don't even think this should be a political left-right issue, but apparently everything in America has to be politicized for some reason.  I guess it is to avoid personal responsibility for anything.

We're going to have to disagree on this one. 

There are going to be criminals and other undesirables in any group of immigrants (or people born here for that matter).  It used to be potential immigrants were screened - for disease, to determine whether they had skills we needed, to determine whether they were enemies of the US, and so on.  There were annual quotas on the number of people who could come in from various countries, so that those who did come would assimilate. 

A lot of that has gone out the window.  We certainly have no control over our southern border now.  Expecting assimilation has been deemed 'racism' by some.  We are printing out ballots and voter information in dozens of languages.  Most Americans oppose all this. 

I doubt very much our ideals of Liberty and Freedom require us to allow immigration of people who have a much higher propensity of hatred towards our country, and towards the West in general.  And who have a much higher propensity to use terrorism here to advance their agenda,  We are under no legal, moral, or ethical requirement to do so.  Only 'Political Correctness' requires it.


By the way, Islam is found in all races.  This is not about race, although I get it that for some everything in the US is required to be about race.

And by the way I do have a couple friends who are Muslims.  One is a Sufi (religious philosophical branch of Islam), originally from Bangladesh.  I posted a link to an article on a speech he recently gave to fellow San Francisco Bay Area Sufis.  I would have guessed among Muslims this group would be the most open, enlightened, and supportive of Western values.  And among Muslims in general, they probably are.  The topic of the speech was whether it is in the best interests of Muslims to be pro-West.  Among Sufis living in the SF Bay Area willing to go to this event, a large percentage disagreed.  That should be quite illuminating - even among Sufis living here, too many are anti-Western

The reason we have immigration is because it benefits us.  Not to benefit those who wish to come here.  We should be making sure we are truly benefitting from those we allow in.  ISIS, al-Qaeda, Hamas, the Palestine Authority, the Moslem Brotherhood, etc, may have a limited number of actual members, but their support is widespread among Muslims.  Are we supposed to ignore the results of Islamic immigration in places like France, the Netherlands, Germany, Sweden, Denmark among others?  For the sake of 'Political Correctness'?  As I said, we are going to have to disagree

By the way here is that article on my friends speech again:

  http://thepioneeronline.com/22622/politics/sufi-thinker-urges-pro-west-attitude/

[FightTheFuture]

Well, who knows,  perhaps the French police will now venture into the " urban sensitive zones" sprinkled throughout France.






Nahhhhhh; I doubt it.

[albrecht]

I think that example may be both skewed and inaccurate.


For example;


Catholic system - have as many children as nature dictates because contraception is a sin, meaning hordes of children that the parent/s can neither afford to feed nor educate. I can give a real life example of the Christians next door to us, the mother just yesterday giving birth to child number 10, perhaps 14 months after child number 9.  She's still of breeding age so she's probably not done yet. She could end up with 15 or 16, it being "God's will" and that's a direct quote.


Secular System - Myself and the wife, an atheist and an agnostic respectively,  have one child, will only have the one child, his college fund is in great shape, he has extracurricular activities outside of his education that involve karate, swimming, soccer, snowboarding, and when we find the time, he'll be taking private lessons in either Chinese or Spanish, depending on which he prefers.   The point being he's going to be well rounded in mind, body, and outlook.  He'll be capable of contributing to society. 


This is not a hypothetical, this is a real life scenario.

Logical for the short-term but only if the border is controlled and manufacturing and agriculture is properly mechanized- or outsourced to other countries. The problem is, like with many countries in Europe, your logical plan is great for your family but not good for society over-all longterm is it results in a net loss of native population for the country. Thus import immigrants to maintain jobs as population gets older and is not replacing itself (and the jobs that natives won't do or because there is not enough native population to do them anymore.) So you import immigrants WITH more backwards religious beliefs, that DON'T accept "secular" (or even modern) values, and HAVE more children than the native population once here and who grow up to resent the country, society, and "secular" people still living there (especially as they are in more menial jobs and are ghettoized) the "secular" native children get good schools, jobs, and life.) So you get civil unrest, bombings, shootings, crimes, riots in the streets, terrorism, etc. And, eventually, the loss of the country (at least as it was.)

This is not a hypothetical, this is a real life scenario.

[b_dubb]

Its always funny to watch libtards conform confirm what we already know they'll say. Mass shooting, blame guns. Islamic terrorism, blame Christianity. Islamic terrorists using guns in France, blame the US and those who don't hate the US ie. Republicans, Bush, Reagan, Palin, FoxNews, Limbaugh, The US, The unconstitutional US Constitution, blah blah blah. Most importantly, never, under any circumstances, blame the Gentle Jihadists.

It's always funny to watch Cuntservatives switch off their brains and start barfing out dogma like the well trained dogs that they are.  Go talk to the wall.  It might find your regurgitated talking points from Faux News amusing.

[Juan]

We recognized that our enemy was not only Hitler as an individual, but National Socialism as a philosophy.  It's interesting to me that so many refuse to see Islamofascism (not Islam) as the enemy of Western liberal values.

BTW, if the Islamists were upset by Charlie Hedbro, I wonder what they think of this one - http://www.jihadacrossamerica.blogspot.com/

[albrecht]

We recognized that our enemy was not only Hitler as an individual, but National Socialism as a philosophy.  It's interesting to me that so many refuse to see Islamofascism (not Islam) as the enemy of Western liberal values.

BTW, if the Islamists were upset by Charlie Hedbro, I wonder what they think of this one - http://www.jihadacrossamerica.blogspot.com/

There was a fairly strong connection with Hitler and his regime and radical Islam (Mohammedan Legion, Wolgatatarische Legion,Turkestanisch Legion, 444.Sicherungs Division, etc and even two SS divisions: 'Osttürkischen Waffen-Verbände der SS' etc.) And, of course infamously, his support and coorespondence with of the Grand Mufti Haj Amin al-Husseini. Not the first time, or last time, "western" power decided to use the violence and ruthlessness of Islam for their own military and political goals. 

Interesting non-Nazi people, in addition to outright NAZIs like Himmler, also were intrigued with Islam (Nietzsche, etc etc) in the years prior to the 3rd Reich. Because Christianity was seen as "weak" and Islam was "strong" and single-minded (no "turning other cheek" or complications of a tri-une Godhead, etc.) So fit with the more "traditional" pagan Volk values that Germany had lost. And also more accepting, as they saw it, of a strong-leader and total war.

[Yorkshire pud]

Its always funny to watch libtards conform confirm what we already know they'll say. Mass shooting, blame guns. Islamic terrorism, blame Christianity. Islamic terrorists using guns in France, blame the US and those who don't hate the US ie. Republicans, Bush, Reagan, Palin, FoxNews, Limbaugh, The US, The unconstitutional US Constitution, blah blah blah. Most importantly, never, under any circumstances, blame the Gentle Jihadists.

He he; off you go again, multiple non[/font] sequiturs. But to make it simple enough even for you: Mass shooting blame easy access[/font] to guns Islamic (or any other terrorism), blame the terrorists. Terrorists use guns in Paris, blame the terrorists. As for the rest of your rant, I've no idea what you're trying to say...But anyway, those are the important points.

[Yorkshire pud]

We recognized that our enemy was not only Hitler as an individual, but National Socialism as a philosophy.  It's interesting to me that so many refuse to see Islamofascism (not Islam) as the enemy of Western liberal values.

BTW, if the Islamists were upset by Charlie Hedbro, I wonder what they think of this one - http://www.jihadacrossamerica.blogspot.com/

The enemy was the Nazis? I'd agree on that one 100%, but oddly some were welcomed with open arms into the USA just after the closing act of WW2, either directly into the USA or helped to escape to South America. I'm no statistician, but I'll lay a bet that the Nazis murdered more people than any Islamic terror group or combined.

[RealCool Daddio]

What is amazing is that some the responding police were also not armed (at least according to latest reporting.) That takes some guts-- but a bad policing policy, especially when a country has a pro-Islam immigration policy and suburbs filled with Islamic, malcontented criminals. If any good can come of this latest act of peace by those peaceful Muslims, it is that the "Front national pour l'unité française", and other parties, will likely gain even more seats and even so-called "non-rightist" Frenchmen may begin to rethink their Islamist immigration policy.

Though, I'm thinking the government, and usual suspects, will immediately begin their hand-wringing about assimilation and self-recriminations and start their "accommodation" and "can't we all just get along" and "Islam is the religion of peace" marches, speeches, and the usual tripe.

But Obama's exhortation was certainly true for those poor victims of peace:
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam."
-Barack Hussein Obama Jan.25, 2012

"These acts of violence against innocents violate the fundamental tenets of the Islamic faith.  And it's important for my fellow Americans to understand that. The English translation is not as eloquent as the original Arabic, but let me quote from the Koran, itself:  In the long run, evil in the extreme will be the end of those who do evil.  For that they rejected the signs of Allah and held them up to ridicule.
The face of terror is not the true faith of Islam.  That's not what Islam is all about.  Islam is peace.  These terrorists don't represent peace.  They represent evil and war."
George W. Bush, Sept. 17, 2001

[Juan]

I'd take that bet. The Nazis had only about a decade to murder.  The Islamists have had about 1500 years. Politicians are fond of saying most Muslims are killed by other Muslims. I haven't bothered to count up, but that seems right.


Still no comments here about Sisi's call for a reset on Islam.

[Yorkshire pud]

I'd take that bet. The Nazis had only about a decade to murder.  The Islamists have had about 1500 years. Politicians are fond of saying most Muslims are killed by other Muslims. I haven't bothered to count up, but that seems right.


Still no comments here about Sisi's call for a reset on Islam.

Don't forget to factor in genocide waged by the Romans, the Saxons, the Celts, the Vikings, Genghis Khan, Alexander the Great, Various tribal warfares irrespective of religion...




However it doesn't address or excuse the 'kiss and make up' with the Nazis post war.

[albrecht]

"These acts of violence against innocents violate the fundamental tenets of the Islamic faith.  And it's important for my fellow Americans to understand that. The English translation is not as eloquent as the original Arabic, but let me quote from the Koran, itself:  In the long run, evil in the extreme will be the end of those who do evil.  For that they rejected the signs of Allah and held them up to ridicule.
The face of terror is not the true faith of Islam.  That's not what Islam is all about.  Islam is peace.  These terrorists don't represent peace.  They represent evil and war."
George W. Bush, Sept. 17, 2001

I know, it is quite ridiculous the mollycoddling of radicals and Islam. Remember before Bush was elected he was against wars and against "national building?" And he was elected on that platform. But as soon as 911 happened it was all of a sudden war everywhere and nation building. All at the same time claiming there is nothing wrong with Islam and they are not our enemy- and keeping the borders open and taking in Islamic people even. Insane. If we spend even a small percentage of our war costs on sealing the border, surveilling and deporting Islamists, and targeted financial sanctions (including seizing all assets, including gold, of any Islamic "royals" who fund- or allow people from their country to commit terrorism- held in US, European banks or in the BoE, Federal Reserve system, etc.) and assassinations of key Islamists we would be much better off.

[albrecht]

Don't forget to factor in genocide waged by the Romans, the Saxons, the Celts, the Vikings, Genghis Khan, Alexander the Great, Various tribal warfares irrespective of religion...




However it doesn't address or excuse the 'kiss and make up' with the Nazis post war.

Nobody is 'kissing and making up with NAZIs' post-war, well, we did if they had technical expertise or ran large manufacturing concerns or banks-  but that is another sordid story. But saying we can't deal with the Germans and Austrians because they supported NAZI or that we can't jointly go after Muslims because some on the far-right in France don't like them would be like the USA refusing Lend-Lease or later joining in WWII (when the Germans never attacked us) because England kicked out all the Jews in 1290 or some prominent people in England had no problem with Hitler. So why should we help them out (even if that "evil" Christian "terrorist" Cromwell allowed Jews back in some centuries later.) Sometimes you need to join with people that you might not 100% agree with against a larger, foreign enemy- especially when they are already living amongst you.

[RealCool Daddio]

I know, it is quite ridiculous the mollycoddling of radicals and Islam. Remember before Bush was elected he was against wars and against "national building?" And he was elected on that platform. But as soon as 911 happened it was all of a sudden war everywhere and nation building. All at the same time claiming there is nothing wrong with Islam and they are not our enemy- and keeping the borders open and taking in Islamic people even. Insane. If we spend even a small percentage of our war costs on sealing the border, surveilling and deporting Islamists, and targeted financial sanctions (including seizing all assets, including gold, of any Islamic "royals" who fund- or allow people from their country to commit terrorism- held in US, European banks or in the BoE, Federal Reserve system, etc.) and assassinations of key Islamists we would be much better off.

When you find yourself less tolerant than a torture loving war criminal like Bush, you should seek professional help in an expeditious manner.

[FightTheFuture]

ce est venu de nous?

[Catsmile]

Logical for the short-term but only if the border is controlled and manufacturing and agriculture is properly mechanized- or outsourced to other countries. The problem is, like with many countries in Europe, your logical plan is great for your family but not good for society over-all longterm is it results in a net loss of native population for the country. Thus import immigrants to maintain jobs as population gets older and is not replacing itself (and the jobs that natives won't do or because there is not enough native population to do them anymore.) So you import immigrants WITH more backwards religious beliefs, that DON'T accept "secular" (or even modern) values, and HAVE more children than the native population once here and who grow up to resent the country, society, and "secular" people still living there (especially as they are in more menial jobs and are ghettoized) the "secular" native children get good schools, jobs, and life.) So you get civil unrest, bombings, shootings, crimes, riots in the streets, terrorism, etc. And, eventually, the loss of the country (at least as it was.)

This is not a hypothetical, this is a real life scenario.

We must keep America pure.
Round up the Islamic people and put them in the ghettos... for later.
Wouldn't jew agree?

[albrecht]

We must keep America pure.
Round up the Islamic people and put them in the ghettos... for later.
Wouldn't jew agree?

Of course I never said put them in ghettos but I appreciate you resorting to Godwin's Law so quickly! A sure sign of lack of debating skills or lack of facts. Having said that many Muslims around the world would LOVE to live in the type of ghettos we have in the USA or Europe, better than their war-torn cities and would enjoy more freedom in the worst of our inner-cities (in fact when they come here, as we see in certain Parisian suburbs or areas of Holland- they often ghettoize themselves.)

Not that I would expect you to know any history but interestingly those of you so quick to claim "Hitler" in others always ignore the meetings and correspondence between Haj Mohammed Effendi Amin el-Husseini and Hitler (and other NDSAP leadership) or the army divisions, including SS groups  like SS Handschar etc, made up of Islamic people who fought for the AXIS cause. (Not the first, or last, time, Western powers tried to use Islam for their own military and political purposes.) Some interesting reading here (both NAZI site, of course! ):
http://www.hoover.org/research/mufti-and-holocaust
http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/History/muftihit.html

[PB the Deplorable]

He he; off you go again, multiple non sequiturs. But to make it simple enough even for you: Mass shooting blame easy access to guns, Islamic (or any other terrorism), blame the terrorists. Terrorists use guns in Paris, blame the terrorists. As for the rest of your rant, I've no idea what you're trying to say...But anyway, those are the important points.

Yes, blame the people who are doing the shooting, not the guns themselves

Don't forget to factor in genocide waged by the Romans, the Saxons, the Celts, the Vikings, Genghis Khan, Alexander the Great, Various tribal warfares irrespective of religion...

You're getting warmer, Pud.  Back in those days people resisted the barbarians and aggressors as best they could.  We should be doing the same now

[analog kid]

It's always funny to watch Cuntservatives switch off their brains and start barfing out dogma like the well trained dogs that they are.  Go talk to the wall.  It might find your regurgitated talking points from Faux News amusing.

It's funny, because no one on the left in this thread was blaming the Paris attack on guns (or Christianity), but meanwhile Fox News is blaming the Paris attack on gun control measures.

[Catsmile]

Of course I never said put them in ghettos but I appreciate you resorting to Godwin's Law so quickly! A sure sign of lack of debating skills or lack of facts. Having said that many Muslims around the world would LOVE to live in the type of ghettos we have in the USA or Europe, better than their war-torn cities and would enjoy more freedom in the worst of our inner-cities (in fact when they come here, as we see in certain Parisian suburbs or areas of Holland- they often ghettoize themselves.)

Not that I would expect you to know any history but interestingly those of you so quick to claim "Hitler" in others always ignore the meetings and correspondence between Haj Mohammed Effendi Amin el-Husseini and Hitler (and other NDSAP leadership) or the army divisions, including SS groups  like SS Handschar etc, made up of Islamic people who fought for the AXIS cause. (Not the first, or last, time, Western powers tried to use Islam for their own military and political purposes.) Some interesting reading here (both NAZI site, of course! ):
http://www.hoover.org/research/mufti-and-holocaust
http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/History/muftihit.html

And of course you have never heard of a slippery slope, when it suits you.

Please show your "facts."
Otherwise my bullshit stands just as strong as your bullshit.  :
Ah history the "facts" of the victors. Just like your idea that religion saved us from the dark ages, because it saved knowledge. What are the dark ages? And why was it so dark? Put the clown back in his car. At least when you stuck to your 3 notes you knew how to play them well. Now you are just flailing in the dark, to suit a narrative. 

A narrative thats so ludicrous that only a ludicrous reply is befitting.
Otherwise if taken seriously it only merits being ignored.   

[pyewacket]

Unless we adapt strict rules for immigration and assimilation, we are inviting extremist behavior to take root and grow in the US. We already have groups in our population who have fallen behind and are acting out with violence and death. Do we need more of this?

I'm not going to argue about the religion because I don't know enough about it. All I can do is observe what is going on in their home countries and in the countries where they immigrate. I will say that not all of any group deserves to come here. If they leave their adopted countries to fight for ISIS, they should lose their citizenship and never be allowed back into the country. Same for any who knowingly supported them. Citizenship in our country should not be treated as a joke- it should have value.

The extremists can't get along with their fellow Muslims- why would anyone expect them to respect people from other cultures?

Here are some links about Afghanistan with pictures from the 50s and 60s. Normal looking culture for the time- now they live in a Mad Max world.

http://blogs.denverpost.com/captured/2013/01/28/podlich-afghanistan-1960s-photos/5846/

http://izismile.com/2013/06/26/old_photos_show_a_very_different_afghanistan_in_20_pics.html

http://www.mtholyoke.edu/~mvcarmac/taliban.html#women 

[albrecht]

http://archive.archaeology.org/9809/abstracts/darkages.html

Ah history the "facts" of the victors. Just like your idea that religion saved us from the dark ages, because it saved knowledge. What are the dark ages? And hey was it so dark? Put the clown back in his car.

You asking about "facts" of the victors? Thankfully Hitler didnt win and neither have the Muslims (yet) so the only facts I have are those written by us, the victors. Im sure you could find some NAZI apologetics to support your views on the web somewhere or some fatwas currently being spouted. But, for me, the links, photos, and research on WWIi is sufficient- even though we won, which I consider a good thing. But seem to disagree with you maybe on that.
Ps: 'dark ages' is hardly used in academic circles for that period anymore. Since you don't know much history I suggest google. Just a few articles for you.
http://foreignpolicy.com/2011/02/21/the-not-so-dark-ages/ (hey! Evil CFR organization even!)
http://archive.archaeology.org/9809/abstracts/darkages.html
Pps: wasnt it awful, simply awful, to see mourning in Notre Dame today? How DARE people, even government officials (!), have a ceremony in an evil Christiam church after a simple display of disaffection for our evil society by friendly Muslims!

[Gd5150]

Wasn't all the Islamic terrorism that was obviously a result of the Bush/Cheney imperialism supposed to stop? It's only been 6 years since Obatard was elected. Is this because of his imperialistic ways as well? Thought so.


Wouldn't it be funny if those evil Christians responded the same way as the Jentle Jihadists every time they were made of fun of. Forget the mainstream media, there'd be no news/entertainment/interweb media left at all. Damm evil imperialistic Christians.


Yesterdays tragedy was clearly a result of the FRA (French Rifleman's Associatoin). Blame Le Charltone Hestonois.

[Kelt]

I don't know why right wingers have such a hard time just saying the names of things, rather than using third grade nicknames.  Obamatard, Libtards, Lesbitards, Democraptards. 


Is that the level at which they operate?


Surely you reach adulthood and that particular trait is left for the kids?


And, again, I'm observing this as someone who is neither Democrat or Republican.


Serious question to right wingers.


EDIT: To clarify, I do observe not-so-right-wingers (Democrats) using juvenile epithets, but easily at a 1:10 ratio against.

[analog kid]

Wasn't all the Islamic terrorism that was obviously a result of the Bush/Cheney imperialism supposed to stop? It's only been 6 years since Obatard was elected. Is this because of his imperialistic ways as well? Thought so.


Wouldn't it be funny if those evil Christians responded the same way as the Jentle Jihadists every time they were made of fun of. Forget the mainstream media, there'd be no news/entertainment/interweb media left at all. Damm evil imperialistic Christians.


Yesterdays tragedy was clearly a result of the FRA (French Rifleman's Associatoin). Blame Le Charltone Hestonois.

It's like playing strawman bingo.