Hillary Clinton

[norland2424]

You can't make this looney tune shit up. Now Yoko Ono claims she had an affair with Hillary. Is this a parody website, or just a parody election?

http://theusualroutine.com/2016/10/01/yoko-ono-affair-hillary-clinton-70s/

it might be bs since the story links to this website.

http://worldnewsdailyreport.com/paparazzi-threatens-to-release-nude-pictures-of-hillary-clinton-to-highest-bidder/

[Dr. MD MD]

You can't make this looney tune shit up. Now Yoko Ono claims she had an affair with Hillary. Is this a parody website, or just a parody election?

http://theusualroutine.com/2016/10/01/yoko-ono-affair-hillary-clinton-70s/

We've entered the matrix, dude. The program is apparently making this shit up on the fly. 

Actually, I do remember reading this story before. I think it's a legit quote.

[21st Century Man]

I'm tired of sacrificing a genuine future for the sake of a bit of comedy. There are lots of great comedians. We really don't need to constantly mine politics for comedy. Here's a revolutionary idea: Maybe we should try taking it seriously for a change. 

Yep.  I don't think Hillary is worth a chance.  Her record and history betray her.  All those caught up in defending her can continue to remain ignorant for all I care.

[Jackstar]

Besides, I might just be an idiot savant on the subjects of politics and morality.

Signs point to negative, Ghost Rider.

[analog kid]

Yeah...

He inserted himself into a conversation he was completely clueless about, and that nonsense was supposed to be him explaining himself.

Is he another one of these shit slinging /pol/ goons?

[theONE]

What's with Hillary and loosing her shoes ?

Here she lost right shoe on Jan.29.2010 in France.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/01/29/hillary-clinton-loses-her_n_442602.html
"Hillary Clintonâ€"flustered, perhaps, by the news that George Stephanopoulos is her cousin...
or by a recent slew of meetings with her “crush” David Milibandâ€"suffered an embarrassing wardrobe malfunction
on the steps of Elysee Palace Friday.
While ascending to greet President Sarkozy, the secretary of state stepped right out of her black kitten heel,
HollywoodLife.com points out.
After she retrieved the footwear, the two cracked a joke, and Clinton was on her way to the planned bilateral meeting."

Since 9/11-2016 in NewYork and her collapse when she also lost her right shoe Hillary had no medical issues, no coughing, no major mishaps.
Perhaps it's time for something freaky to happen to put her in the news again.
Let's see what's brewing deep in the pitt of Hell




[attachment deleted by admin]

[attachment deleted by admin]

[theONE]

?

[attachment deleted by admin]

[Dr. MD MD]

?

I guess her nickname should be shoeless. 

[Dr. MD MD]

Is it wrong of me to want to see her assassinated Kennedy style now? 

[Dr. MD MD]

Well, I'm watching Twitter implode over this right now. They're censoring anything to do with Podesta by retitling it Podestra and other stupid misspellings. I doubt they'll have much credibility after this. If people start leaving them en mass then this company could tank as a result. Maybe going short on Twitter over the next week would be advisable. 

[norland2424]

Well, I'm watching Twitter implode over this right now. They're censoring anything to do with Podesta by retitling it Podestra and other stupid misspellings. I doubt they'll have much credibility after this. If people start leaving them en mass then this company could tank as a result. Maybe going short on Twitter over the next week would be advisable. 

twitter is going to be sold soon

http://www.inquisitr.com/3546067/twitter-could-be-sold-to-walt-disney/

[Dr. MD MD]

More of Hillary's opinions. She's a real humanitarian.  :

[Dr. MD MD]

LOL! People are starting to go down over this. Let the bodies hit the floor! 

http://politicsnow.buffalonews.com/2016/09/22/nine-charged-bombshell-state-corruption-case/

[Dr. MD MD]

 

[Astrid Galactic]

Well, I'm watching Twitter implode over this right now. They're censoring anything to do with Podesta by retitling it Podestra and other stupid misspellings. I doubt they'll have much credibility after this. If people start leaving them en mass then this company could tank as a result. Maybe going short on Twitter over the next week would be advisable. 

Potential buyers are all backing off now. Twitter's going down and they have mostly themselves to blame.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-10-08/twitter-sales-process-said-almost-dead-as-suitors-lose-interest

"Twitter once saw interest from Alphabet Inc.’s Google, Salesforce.com Inc. and Walt Disney Co., all of which consulted with banks on whether to acquire the social-media company. Now all of those suitors are unlikely to make a bid, according to people familiar with the matter. On Friday, Twitter had planned to have a board meeting with outside advisers on a sale but canceled, one of the people said."

[Value Of Pi]

Is it wrong of me to want to see her assassinated Kennedy style now? 

Posts like this are all the reason that agencies like NSA and the Secret Service need to monitor every corner of the Internet. No doubt you'll continue to post crap like this while complaining about government intrusion -- never mind a knock on your door.

[Dr. MD MD]

Posts like this are all the reason that agencies like NSA and the Secret Service need to monitor every corner of the Internet. No doubt you'll continue to post crap like this while complaining about government intrusion -- never mind a knock on your door.

Just trying to keep up with your crap. 

Oh yeah, and go fuck yourself! 

They can come a knockin any time because what I do here is obviously just commentary and satire. You're just too bloody stupid it to realize it...or when anyone is joking apparently.

Quote from: Value Of Pi on October 07, 2016, 06:47:44 PM

    I'm actually pretty good with the self-deprecating humor -- at least, people claim to appreciate it. I could maybe teach it to you. You're way too sensitive sometimes. We're critiquing a website design, not your schlong,

MV's response:
if you have to specifically articulate that you're "pretty good with the self-deprecating humor," then you're probably a dud with it.  your posts on bellgab do nothing to refute my contention.

also, from where i sit, the only thing requiring "critique" is your incompetence where recognizing an obvious joke is concerned.  that was probably just your unbridled condescension talking, though, because in your putrid mind, only you are capable of recognizing the error of animated bill gates gifs and spinning doodads from 1998.  you're lecturing others about being "too sensitive"?  that's rich.  you're perhaps the forum's biggest crybaby ever, and i've been around here for almost nine years.

let go of the anger, tits.  it'll help you heal.  remember:  you have no need to engage in self deprecation.  as routinely demonstrated around here, others deprecate you just fine.

Me again:
Go on though. I know you have some more blustery moralizing to do, you waste of human life!  :

[Value Of Pi]

Just trying to keep up with your crap. 

Oh yeah, and go fuck yourself! 

They can come a knockin any time because what I do here is obviously just commentary and satire. You're just too bloody stupid it to realize it...or when anyone is joking apparently.

You can explain to the nice officer that you were only joking. He'll then ask about any firearms you may own and their purpose. Afterwards, he'll suggest that you refrain from making any additional threats in the future, joking or otherwise, which would require another visit. In the meantime, your name and info will go in an official database. If this sounds okay to you, go for it.

[Dr. MD MD]

You can explain to the nice officer that you were only joking. He'll then ask about any firearms you may own and their purpose. Afterwards, he'll suggest that you refrain from making any additional threats in the future, joking or otherwise, which would require another visit. In the meantime, your name and info will go in an official database. If this sounds okay to you, go for it.

Right, and then I'd point out that no threat was actually made. A question was posed in jest on a message board devoted to old talk radio shows. I'd point out how silly he and his agency and government would look if he proceeded and then I'd then tell him that there's a Canadian agitator on this board named Value of Pi trying to effect the outcome of this election. They're not too crazy about that sort of thing these days, you know. 

[Value Of Pi]

Right, and then I'd point out that no threat was actually made. A question was posed in jest on a message board devoted to old talk radio shows. I'd point out how silly he and his agency and government would look if he proceeded and then I'd then tell him that there's a Canadian agitator on this board named Value of Pi trying to effect the outcome of this election. They're not too crazy about that sort of thing these days, you know. 

And when they found out that Value of Pi wasn't a Canadian agitator, they'd be forced to re-examine whatever posts and other claims you had made more intensively. You might become a "person of interest," although never an interesting person.

[Dr. MD MD]

And when they found out that Value of Pi wasn't a Canadian agitator, they'd be forced to re-examine whatever posts and other claims you had made more intensively. You might become a "person of interest," although never an interesting person.

For someone who doesn't find me interesting you sure can't stop responding to my posts. I think you're more than interested, if you know what I mean? 

However, I find you to be a truly disgusting person of no merit and I'm not attracted to you in the least.  Beat it, loser! :

[Dr. MD MD]

Value of Pi:

[Kidnostad3]

Did your make believe wife enjoy the sex tape your racist cult leader said she should check out?  Did it bother you that brown skinned people were in it?  "Im" keen to know.

Here is a recent picture of my imaginary wife and I.  Okay, I've shown you mine, now you show me yours. 

[Kidnostad3]

For someone who doesn't find me interesting you sure can't stop responding to my posts. I think you're more than interested, if you know what I mean? 

However, I find you to be a truly disgusting person of no merit and I'm not attracted to you in the least.  Beat it, loser! :

Wow, I just had one of those episodes wherein one cringes in embarrassment over the words or actions of another and wants to ask "what the fuck is wrong with you?"   Is resorting to slimey innuendo your plan B.  I don't know whether you are male, female or undecided but I can't imagine your thinking that anyone of any sex or any species would be attracted to you on the basis of your laughably inane rhetoric on this board?  Please don't try to project your narcissistic sexual fantasies onto others. It's way out of place in this forum and makes those who witness it want to take a showe

[mikuthing01]

It's over. Trump won.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zHh73fkDUIs

[Dr. MD MD]

Wow, I just had one of those episodes wherein one cringes in embarrassment over the words or actions of another and wants to ask "what the fuck is wrong with you?"   Is resorting to slimey innuendo your plan B.  I don't know whether you are male, female or undecided but I can't imagine your thinking that anyone of any sex or any species would be attracted to you on the basis of your laughably inane rhetoric on this board?  Please don't try to project your narcissistic sexual fantasies onto others. It's way out of place in this forum and makes those who witness it want to take a showe

First, maybe trying reading back a bit to get the whole picture of the discussion. I was responding to a Pi post. That should really tell you all you need to know. I was responding to his attempts to turn anyone's posts he doesn't agree with into some sort of slimy innuendo. Second, why you would choose to take my words literally I can't understand so maybe you're like Pi and really don't understand humor. Third, get a fucking clue!  :

[GuerrillaUnReal]

Well, I'm watching Twitter implode over this right now. They're censoring anything to do with Podesta by retitling it Podestra and other stupid misspellings. I doubt they'll have much credibility after this. If people start leaving them en mass then this company could tank as a result. Maybe going short on Twitter over the next week would be advisable. 

Their stock price already dropped about 25% in one day a few days ago and their entire corporate structure is a cluster fuck.

[Dr. MD MD]

She privately admits that there's no way to properly vet Syrian refugees. 

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/10/08/wikileaks-hillary-clinton-jordan-cant-vet-refugees-syria-jihadists-coming-along-legitimate-refugees/

[Kidnostad3]

First, maybe trying reading back a bit to get the whole picture of the discussion. I was responding to a Pi post. That should really tell you all you need to know. I was responding to his attempts to turn anyone's posts he doesn't agree with into some sort of slimy innuendo. Second, why you would choose to take my words literally I can't understand so maybe you're like Pi and really don't understand humor. Third, get a fucking clue!  :

I checked the context again and I still don't find that accusing someone of having an underlying sexual motive to be in good taste nor is it rhetorical fair play no matter what the intent.   Frankly, my first impression was that it was a thinly veiled gay overture. Before those in the gay lobby rise up in righteous indignation, let me say that I really don't give a rat's ass about what consenting adults do in privacy nor do I necssarily think less of those with that predilection.  What I do object to is the recent tendency of gay's with a newly found sense of privilege to flaunt and promote their life-style at the slightest opportunity.  Regardless of which way you swing, it seems to me that keeping the conversation above the crotch level is the best way to go on blogs. 

I will admit to using an excess of vitriol in my post which I am man enough to own and apologize for.  (It was the first thing I saw when I got up and I hadn't had a cup of coffee yet.). 

[Dr. MD MD]

I checked the context again and I still don't find that accusing someone of having a underlying sexual motive to be in good taste nor is it rhetorical fair play no matter what the intent.   Frankly, my first impression was that it was a thinly veiled gay overture. Before those in the gay lobby rise up in righteous indignation, let me say that I really don't give a rat's ass about what consenting adults do in privacy nor do I necssarily think less of those with that predilection.  What I do object to is the recent tendency of gay's with a newly found sense of privilege to flaunt and promote their life-style at the slightest opportunity.  Regardless of which way you swing, it seems to me that keeping the conversation above the crotch level is the best way to go on blogs. 

I will admit to using an excess of vitriol in my post which I am man enough to own and apologize for.  (It was the first thing I saw when I got up and I hadn't had a cup of coffee yet.).

It was alright for Pi to suggest that I was actually calling for the assassination of a presidential candidate though?! 

Well, then you're an idiot and there's nothing I can do for you. I say good day, sir!

P.S. Wait until the second cup before responding next time. 

Also, that you seem to wringing your hands in regard to my post about whether you think I'm gay or not...hillarious!