President Donald J. Trump

[136 or 142]

Is there a person on the planet who doesn't think their opinions are correct?  What sort of idiotic meme is that?

[136 or 142]

If that's the change in policy, then that's the change in policy. Personally, I don't think Latvia is worth a nuclear conflict, so Trump does have a point. I really don't like the idea of automatic war, especially in a modern context.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JKbDKsNsjac

[21st Century Man]

Is there a person on the planet who doesn't think their opinions are correct?  What sort of idiotic meme is that?

You lack humility. I know I'm not always right.  I think most people would admit they are wrong sometimes.  Oh and

[136 or 142]

You lack humility. I know I'm not always right.  I think most people would admit they are wrong sometimes.

What might you not be right about here (or, which of these might you be wrong about?):

That Donald Trump isn't a psychopath?
That Hillary Clinton is more corrupt than Donald Trump?
That all the claims of corruption against Donald Trump are 'speculation'?
That Donald Trump has a coherent foreign policy?
That Donald Trump has a foreign policy?
That Donald Trump isn't a petty moron who would use nuclear weapons because some foreign leader insulted him?
That Hillary Clinton is advocating aggression against Putin and Russia?
That the U.S military is 'hollowed out'?
That Hillary Clinton is advocating on behalf of the military industrial complex?

The reason I think I'm right about things is because I research before I comment.  Making predictions is always an exercise in uncertainty.  Which of these things have you actually looked into and which ones are you basing on 'speculation.'  It would help to know so that I can determine whether you believe what you write, or if it's something you think you might be wrong about.
Modify message

[21st Century Man]

What might you not be right about here:

That Donald Trump isn't a psychopath?
That Hillary Clinton is more corrupt than Donald Trump?
That Donald Trump has a coherent foreign policy?
That Donald Trump has a foreign policy?
That Hillary Clinton is advocating aggression against Putin and Russia?
That the U.S military is 'hollowed out'?
that Hillary Clinton is fighting on behalf of the military industrial complex?

Sigh.   I think I'm right about most of this; however I have no idea about Trump's foreign policy.  I imagine he will pick reliable advisors who will help him when it comes to those questions.

Don't you find it tiresome quarreling on a forum most of the time?  I know I do.  Look what has happened since we have been spatting.  Comey has reopened his investigation into Hillary's email.

[136 or 142]

Sigh.   I think I'm right about most of this; however I have no idea about Trump's foreign policy.  I imagine he will pick reliable advisors who will help him when it comes to those questions.

Don't you find it tiresome quarreling on a forum most of the time?  I know I do.  Look what has happened since we have been spatting.  Comey has reopened his investigation into Hillary's email.

1.The same way he picked advisers who told him to not engage in the type of campaign that he's engaged in?  If he doesn't listen to them, why would he listen to foreign policy advisers?

2.I don't spend most of my time quarreling on a forum.  Sometimes I find it tiresome, sometimes I amuse myself mocking hyper partisan morons like you.


FBI to Re-Open Investigation Into Clinton Email Server

October 28, 2016By Taegan Goddard31 Comments
“The FBI will re-open its investigation into Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server, bureau director James Comey said in a letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee on Friday,” NBC News reports.

In connection with an unrelated case, the FBI has learned of the existence of emails that appear to be pertinent to the investigation.

I agreed that the FBI should take appropriate investigative steps designed to allow investigators to review these emails to determine whether they contain classified information, as well as to assess their importance to our investigation.
“The FBI language in the letter to Congress makes clear that new evidence has been discovered and thus will be reviewed â€" meaning FBI agents will read these emails. It is unusual for the FBI to tell Congress it is looking over newly discovered evidence in a criminal inquiry that was otherwise closed.”

Washington Post: “The announcement appears to restart the FBI’s probe of Clinton’s server, less than two weeks before the presidential election, an explosive development that could shape the campaign’s final days.”

[136 or 142]

So, taking out Trump's alleged foreign policy here:

That Donald Trump isn't a psychopath?
That Hillary Clinton is more corrupt than Donald Trump?
That all the claims of corruption against Donald Trump are 'speculation'?
That Donald Trump isn't a petty moron who would use nuclear weapons because some foreign leader insulted him?
That Hillary Clinton is advocating aggression against Putin and Russia?
That the U.S military is 'hollowed out'?
That Hillary Clinton is advocating on behalf of the military industrial complex?

Paraphrasing you: "I think I'm right about these things."

[136 or 142]

This is Comey's letter:  This is at the 'we have to investigate to see if there is anything to investigate stage.'

[21st Century Man]

I don't spend most of my time quarreling on a forum.  Sometimes I find it tiresome, sometimes I amuse myself mocking hyper partisan morons like you.

It is funny, I only have problems with you and Donald Noory.  You are two peas in a pod.  I'm moving on.  Catch you later, 136.

[theONE]

It is funny, I only have problems with you and Donald Noory.  You are two peas in a pod.  I'm moving on.  Catch you later, 136.

136 will be in the barn "loving" animals /sans penetration/ because he is a friendly Canadian

[136 or 142]

136 will be in the barn "loving" animals /sans penetration/ because he is a friendly Canadian

Only when you're there, with me too.

[theONE]

Only when you're there, with me too.

you are not being funny just a plain stupid leaf
go and protect your Hillry she is getting shredded to pieces even by her own supporters already,
bitch is going to jail or escaping to QATAR place where she just transferred 1.8 BILLION dollars

October 16, 2016
"Hillary Clinton’s “Sudden Move” Of $1.8 Billion To Qatar Central Bank Stuns Financial World"
http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index2141.htm

[136 or 142]

you are not being funny just a plain stupid leaf

As if you know anything about what is and what isn't funny.

[Juan]

I expect that's probably it. An arms race is in their interest, and the neocons have basically switched sides, so it's just them raising their ugly heads again.

She has to think she can make money from the conflict.

[The King of Kings]

Glory Glory, Trumpeluja!
Glory Glory, Trumpeluja!
Glory Glory, Trumpeluja!

Those illegal immigrants go marching home!

Glory Glory, Trumpeluja!
Glory Glory, Trumpeluja!
Glory Glory, Trumpeluja!

[136 or 142]

It is funny, I only have problems with you and Donald Noory.  You are two peas in a pod.  I'm moving on.  Catch you later, 136.

So, let me ask you this then:  Who here who (regularly) challenges your comments do you not have a problem with?

[Dr. MD MD]

I don't spend most of my time quarreling on a forum.  Sometimes I find it tiresome, sometimes I amuse myself mocking hyper partisan morons like you.

Hilarious! You and a handful of your ilk who we're all familiar with by now are ALWAYS here trying to control the narrative. I've found most here to be pretty reasonable people regardless of party affiliation. You guys are the only ones who come off as "hyper partisan" here.  Pot meet kettle.

[21st Century Man]

So, let me ask you this then:  Who here who (regularly) challenges your comments do you not have a problem with?

I have disagreements but they are never hostile.   I disagree with onan but I respect his views.  I disagree with YP sometimes but it has never caused any friction.  I generally get along with most of the others.

[136 or 142]

Hilarious! You and a handful of your ilk who we're all familiar with by now are ALWAYS here trying to control the narrative. I've found most here to be pretty reasonable people regardless of party affiliation. You guys are the only ones who come off as "hyper partisan" here.  Pot meet kettle.

I'm 'hyper partisan' in terms of promoting ideas, not in terms of promoting a party or a candidate.

[GravitySucks]

I have disagreements but they are never hostile.   I disagree with onan but I respect his views.  I disagree with YP sometimes but it has never caused any friction.  I generally get along with most of the others.

Liar. Your movie reviews are stupid and you know it.

[136 or 142]

I have disagreements but they are never hostile.   I disagree with onan but I respect his views.  I disagree with YP sometimes but it has never caused any friction.  I generally get along with most of the others.

Onan only rarely comments in the politics section. So, there isn't a single person here who regularly challenges your comments who you get along with.  Just as I suspected.

[albrecht]

I have disagreements but they are never hostile.   I disagree with onan but I respect his views.  I disagree with YP sometimes but it has never caused any friction.  I generally get along with most of the others.

Same. You mean people that I often disagree with on some issues but who can write coherently and comments germane to the topic and discussion. Not rambling diatribes often on issues unrelated to the subject thread, personal insults, or, worse, just post memes and or unrelated youtube videos.

[21st Century Man]

I'm 'hyper partisan' in terms of promoting ideas, not in terms of promoting a party or a candidate.

ROTFLMAO!!!!   I'm cracking up here!  The number one Hill Shill on all of Bellgab doesn't promote her.

[GravitySucks]

I'm 'hyper partisan' in terms of promoting ideas, not in terms of promoting a party or a candidate.

Go play with this for awhile. Work on the externalities.

http://commonsensecanadian.ca/canadas-health-care-ranked-30th-world-time-admit-problem/

[21st Century Man]

Onan only rarely comments in the politics section. So, there isn't a single person here who regularly challenges your comments who you get along with.  Just as I suspected.

I generally agree with most of the others here.  You are the only one who constantly challenges my comments.  You should feel special.

[136 or 142]

ROTFLMAO!!!!   I'm cracking up here!  The number one Hill Shill on all of Bellgab doesn't promote her.

I've defended Hillary Clinton, I've criticized her.  At least when I defend her I know my facts, unlike your false and mindless hyper partisan defenses of Bankrupt, Rapist Trump.

[136 or 142]

I generally agree with most of the others here.  You are the only one who constantly challenges my comments.  You should feel special.

So, that probably explains why you have a problem with me, and nothing else.

[Dr. MD MD]

I'm 'hyper partisan' in terms of promoting ideas, not in terms of promoting a party or a candidate.

Fuck you, douche bag! Your spin is muy weakass, hombre. 

[136 or 142]

Go play with this for awhile. Work on the externalities.

http://commonsensecanadian.ca/canadas-health-care-ranked-30th-world-time-admit-problem/

Health economics is not something I've researched a great deal.

[The King of Kings]

Sons of America, I am Donald Trump.  I see a whole voting population going to vote in defiance of Hillary.  You have come to vote as free men.  And free men you are.  What will you do with that freedom?  Will you vote?  Vote and you may change the world.  Run and you may live free, for at least awhile, and watching your country die many years from now.  Would you be willing to trade all the days from this day to that for one chance.....just one chance, to come back here and tell Hillary that she may open our borders to illegal foreigners but she will never destroy our heritage!

America gu bràth!