• Welcome to BellGab/bellchan Archive.
 

President Donald J. Trump

Started by The General, February 10, 2011, 11:33:34 PM

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.


Quote from: pate on October 26, 2016, 11:58:56 PM
Heck, I'd vote for Trump biased off 135 or 142's retardation.  Who in there right mynd wotes ka-ka-CRAZY?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dbJABjVH-0k

You're making more sense than usual at this late hour of the night, pate. LOL. Did you run out of whiskey?

Jackstar

It's pretty sneaky how you uploaded that photo to the server so nobody could see that you got it off of David Duke's website. Kudos.

136 or 142

Quote from: Jackstar on October 27, 2016, 12:00:07 AM
1. ... credible?

2. How is this so much more objectionable than the women who have accused Clinton of immensely more severe behavior?

I don't think you understand how rhetorical questions work.

There are also accusations from some women that Trump raped them.

Quote from: GravitySucks on October 27, 2016, 12:00:39 AM
Proof

ROTF!!!

I really wish Ryan had been primaried. He's useless.

136 or 142

Quote from: 21st Century Man on October 27, 2016, 12:04:36 AM
ROTF!!!

I really wish Ryan had been primaried. He's useless.

He was primaried.

In the 2016 Republican primary election, Ryan faced businessman Paul Nehlen, who had been endorsed by Sarah Palin.[64] Because of Nehlen's support for Trump, Trump publicly thanked him on Twitter and later told The Washington Post that Nehlen was "running a very good campaign", even though he did not endorse him.[65][66][67] On August 5, 2016, Trump endorsed Ryan's re-election after pressure from fellow Republican leaders.[68] On the August 9, 2016 primary election,[69] Ryan overwhelmingly defeated Nehlen, taking over 84% of the vote.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Ryan#Elections

Quote from: 136 or 142 on October 27, 2016, 12:06:19 AM
He was primaried.

By that, I mean I wish he had lost his primary.

Donald Noory

Quote from: Jackstar on October 27, 2016, 12:00:07 AM
1. ... credible?

2. How is this so much more objectionable than the women who have accused Clinton of immensely more severe behavior?

I don't think you understand how rhetorical questions work.

Newsflash! Bill Clinton isn't the nominee. Damn, are you retarded?

Jackstar

Quote from: 136 or 142 on October 27, 2016, 12:04:26 AM
There are also accusations from some women that Trump raped them.

1. ... and?

2. ... so?

3. ...

GravitySucks

Meanwhile, in Texas

Picture taken at a polling location

Donald Noory

Quote from: 136 or 142 on October 27, 2016, 12:04:26 AM
There are also accusations from some women that Trump raped them.

Like his ex-wife. Because she recommended a doctor who did a poor job on his hair transplant.

136 or 142

Quote from: Jackstar on October 27, 2016, 12:09:25 AM
1. ... and?

2. How is this so much more objectionable than the women who have accused Clinton of immensely more severe behavior?

The same accusations against Bill Clinton have also been made against The Trump Thing.

You either didn't remember what you wrote less than 5 minutes ago, or you couldn't figure out the obvious.

Is there a supporter of The Trump Thing who isn't a complete moron?

And, please, this time don't lie that you don't support The Trump Thing.

Quote from: GravitySucks on October 27, 2016, 12:09:41 AM
Meanwhile, in Texas

Picture taken at a polling location

You shouldn't have posted that.  Now 136 will fly down to Texas to protest.  On second thought, good job. :D ;)

136 or 142

Quote from: 21st Century Man on October 27, 2016, 12:14:48 AM
You shouldn't have posted that.  Now 136 will fly down to Texas to protest.  On second thought, good job. :D ;)

You're the moronic rationalizer of evil, not me.

Good news for Trump.  Maybe not so good news for Professor Norpoth should his prediction fail.

Professor Helmut Norpoth, from the Department of Political Science at Stony Brook University in New York, has correctly predicted the past five US presidents. Using a statistical model based on previous election results, he is predicting that Mr Trump will triumph next month. Professor Norpoth told i: “My forecast says that he’s going to win 52.5 per cent of the two-party vote, that would give Hillary 47.5 per cent. I attach something like 87 per cent certainty that he’s going to win.”

Read more at: https://inews.co.uk/essentials/news/world/not-yet-donald-trump-will-win-says-top-forecaster/

Jackstar

Quote from: 136 or 142 on October 27, 2016, 12:11:48 AM
don't lie that you don't support The Trump Thing.

I literally don't know what you think the word 'support' means. Define it.

136 or 142

Quote from: Jackstar on October 27, 2016, 12:19:24 AM
I literally don't know what you think the word 'support' means. Define it.

I literally don't care.

Be a moron around somebody else.

Jackstar

Quote from: Donald Noory on October 27, 2016, 12:09:03 AM
Newsflash! Bill Clinton isn't the nominee.








Quote from: Donald Noory on October 27, 2016, 12:09:03 AM
Damn, are you retarded?

There's that thing again with the rhetorical questions we talked about.



Jackstar

Quote from: 136 or 142 on October 27, 2016, 12:20:09 AM
I literally don't care.

Methinks the lady transparent shill doth protest too much.

136 or 142

Quote from: Jackstar on October 27, 2016, 12:26:00 AM
Methinks the lady transparent shill doth protest too much.

Like I wrote above, why should I give a rat's ass what you think?


136 or 142

To the white morons Trump was their revolutionary candidate
no one with a brain thought he deserved a mandate

136 or 142

Quote from: pate on October 27, 2016, 12:28:59 AM
LITERALLY

You might try listening some day to that Talking Heads record.  I believe it's called Start Making Sense.

Quote from: 136 or 142 on October 27, 2016, 12:31:01 AM
You might try listening some day to that Talking Heads record.  I believe it's called Start Making Sense.

He did and the record is called Stop Making Sense. He follows its suggestion on most nights.

pate

Quote from: 136 or 142 on October 27, 2016, 12:31:01 AM
You might try listening some day to that Talking Heads record.  I believe it's called Start Making Sense.

Hey lady, I don't care how much you like the taste.  You are not gay...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HkuVkgrcYIY

ediotic:

Quote from: pate on October 27, 2016, 12:48:25 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ormylFBXDA

Jackstar

Quote from: 136 or 142 on October 27, 2016, 12:27:16 AM
Like I wrote above, why should I give a rat's ass what you think?

No one is asking you.


Quote from: 136 or 142 on October 27, 2016, 12:11:48 AM
The same accusations against Bill Clinton have also been made against The Trump Thing.

When did Donald Trump blow up an aspirin factory?

theONE

Quote from: Donald Noory on October 26, 2016, 11:53:58 PM
Really? You think it's normal for most males to talk about assaulting women? You're a sick fuck, huh? Wonder if your alleged publisher knows you're ok with talking about assaulting women? Grabbing a pussy would be classed as assault. And it's obvious it wasn't just "locker room talk" as there are 10 or so credible women attesting to how he actually assaulted them. You aren't very smart are you? Once you go beyond "locker room talk" and start laying your hands on people, it's assault. And you're perfectly ok having a man who abuses his position of power and assaults women, as president? Like I said, you're one sick fuck.

Making a mountain out of a molehill is an idiom referring to over-reactive, histrionic behaviour where a person makes too much
of a minor issue. It seems to have come into existence in the 16th century.
The idiom is a metaphor for the common behaviour of responding disproportionately to something - usually an adverse circumstance.
One who "makes a mountain out of a molehill" is said to be greatly exaggerating the severity of the situation.
In cognitive psychology, this form of distortion is called magnification.

The phrase itself is so common that a study by psychologists found that with respect to familiarity and image value,
it ranks high among the 203 common sayings they tested.

ex·ag·ger·ate
iɡˈzajəˌrāt/
verb
gerund or present participle: exaggerating
represent (something) as being larger, greater, better, or worse than it really is.

Jackstar

Quote from: Donald Noory on October 26, 2016, 11:53:58 PM
And you're perfectly ok having a man who abuses his position of power and assaults women, as president? Like I said, you're one sick fuck.





Your concerns about vulnerable classes being oppressed by the powerful seem out of place, disingenuous, and/or sudden, at best.

Powered by SMFPacks Menu Editor Mod