President Donald J. Trump

[Robert Ghostwolf's Ghost]

No. He didn't say that. You can either be cordial or you can be adversarial but you can't be both, not at the same time. Not without being a totally disingenuous douchebag, anyway. 

Which is pretty much the definition of international diplomacy. And you have no idea what I didn't say so quit taking words out of my mouth.

[Dr. MD MD]

Which is pretty much the definition of international diplomacy. And you have no idea what I didn't say so quit taking words out of my mouth.

You say you want a more peaceful relationship with Russia but you also want to keep fucking with them and treating them like an enemy. Which is it? Do you even know?! 

[K_Dubb]

No. He didn't say that. You can either be cordial or you can be adversarial but you can't be both, not at the same time. Not without being a totally disingenuous douchebag, anyway. 

We had this discussion pages ago.  There's at least four definitions of cordial, two of which are adjectives.

[Yorkshire pud]

You are still a fucking idiot.  How was Sessions in any way involved in the Flynn matter.  But for the sake of argument suppose he was, he could simply recuse himself.   Do you rember when Lynch said she would rely on the FBI's recommendation. Your ignorance continues to amaze.

Because he was in the Trump campaign team; and its the Trump campaign team that is facing investigation.


You're welcome.

[Robert Ghostwolf's Ghost]

You say you want a more peaceful relationship with Russia but you also want to keep fucking with them and treating them like an enemy. Which is it? Do you even know?! 

I thought we were talking about disingenuous douchebags. I know plenty of those, but don't consider them enemies.

And whether the U.S. treats Putin like an enemy is and should be determined by his intentions and actions in his dealings with us.

[Jackstar]

http://media.wix.com/ugd/3bebb2_ad9933217cc64d9c9fdf4e34a27756c1.pdf


Seems legit.

[Robert Ghostwolf's Ghost]

We had this discussion pages ago.  There's at least four definitions of cordial, two of which are adjectives.

Ha! I remember that, and am enjoying a bit of the definition you pour in a glass right now. Cheers!

[Dr. MD MD]

I thought we were talking about disingenuous douchebags. I know plenty of those, but don't consider them enemies.

You're getting (easily) confused again. I implied that holding such a contradictory position makes one a disingenuous douchebag.

And whether the U.S. treats Putin like an enemy is and should be determined by his intentions and actions in his dealings with us.

Sure, I agree with that. 

Did you think it was as funny as I did when Obama tried to stare down Putin? 

[Jackstar]

the definition you pour in a glass right now. Cheers!

7% of the 47,677 water systems analyzed had zero records for testing unregulated contaminants
The EPA only requires testing for a fraction of the hundreds of unregulated drinking water pollutants
252,000,000 Americans have been supplied water containing poisons at levels above the maximum standards for safety

Indeed. Cheers. Where everybody knows your name.

[Kidnostad3]

Because he was in the Trump campaign team; and its the Trump campaign team that is facing investigation.


You're welcome.

Has anything you have seen other than Schumer's self serving bullshit accused Sessions of anything?  Did the DOJ after reviewing he matter prefer charges?  Again for the sake of argument if there were, Sessions could simply recuse himself and let the FBI proceed.  There are all sorts of possibilities but no one has even said that laws were broken other than the leaking of classified information. 

[Meister_000]

You are still a fucking idiot.  How was Sessions in any way involved in the Flynn matter.  But for the sake of argument suppose he was, he could simply recuse himself.   Do you remember when Lynch said she would rely on the FBI's recommendation. Your ignorance continues to amaze.

Oy. The Headline:
Business Insider Feb 15 2017
Sessions *won't* (means, refuses-to) *recuse* himself (again) from Trump-Russia investigations â€" here's what the rules say.

I'm too tired right now to do ALL of your work for you so in the meantime Google this:
"sessions conflict of interest russia investigation"
https://www.google.com/search?&q=sessions+conflict+of+interest#q=sessions+conflict+of+interest+russia+investigation

[Dr. MD MD]

Oy. The Headline:
Business Insider Feb 15 2017
Sessions *won't* (means, refuses-to) *recuse* himself (again) from Trump-Russia investigations â€" here's what the rules say.

I assume every article you reference is fake news and you just haven't discovered that yet. 

[K_Dubb]

Ha! I remember that, and am enjoying a bit of the definition you pour in a glass right now. Cheers!

Cheers RGG!  Hope it's a good one.

[Kidnostad3]

Oy. The Headline:
Business Insider Feb 15 2017
Sessions *won't* (means, refuses-to) *recuse* himself (again) from Trump-Russia investigations â€" here's what the rules say.

The rules are protocols not laws.   If he were implicated somewhere along the line he would have to recuse himself as a person under investigation.  Why would he agree to recuse himself.   He has done nothing wrong and neither has Trump.  What Trump Russia investigation?    There is no probable cause despite all your fantasies.  You are really quite limited aren't you.  You always come away from one of your trips to la la land the worse off for it.  You have yet to make a valid point on this thread.

[Dr. MD MD]

who are almost all right leaning.

Pyewacket- Feb 4
DrMDMD- Feb 1
Albrecht- Jan 29
KOK))) - Jan 29
PB - Jan 29
Gravitysucks- Jan 22
Albrecht - Jan 17

It's fine if you need to drop people into polemic categories, I guess. I suppose I am presently "right-leaning" based on the way I voted this time. However, you should understand that this is the first time I've ever voted Republican. I've voted Democratic 5 times in the past; independent once and I abstained once. I voted Republican out of desperation because I felt the Dems had abandoned my values and concerns for something much more...Orwellian. And the obvious mindfuck they were trying to throw on the country genuinely scared me more than any Republican ever has. 

This is what I think you guys still fail to grasp...about this election in general. 

[PB the Deplorable]

I have no life...  After searching through YP's posting history, he is telling the truth.  But what is really interesting is that he quoted others who brought up Hitler who are almost all right leaning.

Pyewacket- Feb 4
DrMDMD- Feb 1
Albrecht- Jan 29
KOK))) - Jan 29
PB - Jan 29
Gravitysucks- Jan 22
Albrecht - Jan 17...

I'm afraid this is a bit of a Fake Statistic.

Back when Shreddi was struggling to define ''right-wing'', and finally decided ''nationalism'' was somehow involved, I posted a random list of well known nationalists to show otherwise - that nationalists came in all stripes.  Hitler was one name on that list, as were Nelson Mandela, Gandhi, and the Dalai Lama, among others.

So sure enough, I 'brought up' Hitler that day, but not in the context suggested.

One name that was excluded from the ''right leaning'' list was Meister.  She appears quite the fan, reading old newspaper clippings and reposting them.  Not sure why these were omitted from the 'right-leaning'' list:

New York Times | Feb. 3, *2008*
... "Hitler came to power in a democracy with a highly liberal constitution, ... adept at using democratic structures to erect forms of Authoritarian rule."...

New York Times April 19, 1935
"Hitler To Appoint German Judges: May Dismiss Them at Any Time for Any Reason He Considers Adequate"

I didn't bother checking to see who else may been overlooked.

[Meister_000]

The rules are protocols not laws.   If he were implicated somewhere along the line he would have to recuse himself as a person under investigation.  Why would he agree to recuse himself.   He has done nothing wrong and neither has Trump.  What Trump Russia investigation?    There is no probable cause despite all your fantasies.  You are really quite limited aren't you.  You always come away from one of your trips to la la land the worse off for it.  You have yet to make a valid point on this thread.

I added a foot to the post, go back and look, enjoy yourself. [and you are _REALLY_ becoming a major disappointment and pain in the ass.]

[starrmtn001]

Hmmm.  Sounds about right.
RIGHT AFTER FLYNN'S RESIGNATION, WIKILEAKS ISSUES HUGE STATEMENT THE DEMS WILL HATE.  2.15.17.

https://youtu.be/4uW5Fu-um_I

[Robert Ghostwolf's Ghost]

You're getting (easily) confused again. I implied that holding such a contradictory position makes one a disingenuous douchebag.

Sure, I agree with that. 

Did you think it was as funny as I did when Obama tried to stare down Putin? 

Not to be disingenuous, but I'll pass. Humor is subjective and impossible to quantify, so I have no way of knowing how funny you thought it was.

[Robert Ghostwolf's Ghost]

Cheers RGG!  Hope it's a good one.

Cruzan dark rum and Dole Pineapple/Orange/Banana juice. Not technically a cordial, but it's tasty and it always makes me cordial. That's all I ask from any libation.

[Dr. MD MD]

Not to be disingenuous, but I'll pass. Humor is subjective and impossible to quantify, so I have no way of knowing how funny you thought it was.

Not even a little funny?! Come on, mang! Putin didn't seem to be sweating too much. He seemed a little confused by it. I think he thought that maybe Barry lost a contact for a moment. 

[Meister_000]

The rules are protocols not laws.   If he were implicated somewhere along the line he would have to recuse himself as a person under investigation.  Why would he agree to recuse himself.   He has done nothing wrong and neither has Trump.  What Trump Russia investigation?    There is no probable cause despite all your fantasies.  You are really quite limited aren't you.  You always come away from one of your trips to la la land the worse off for it.  You have yet to make a valid point on this thread.

>"The rules are protocols not laws."
And I'm sorry I just can't let that slip by. This in the US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE. Do you honestly believe we are talking about mere "protocol" and that there is no "Law" involved? Really? At the DOJ? Really? No "Ethics Laws" at the DOJ? Really?

[PB the Deplorable]

"The rules are protocols not laws." And I'm sorry I just can't let that slip by. This in the US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE. Do you honestly believe we are talking about mere "protocol" and that there is no "Law" involved? Really? At the DOJ? Really?

Just pretend Holder is still there running guns to cartels and Lynch is still asking Bill what she should do about Hilary. 

I think you'll find it soothing.

[Kidnostad3]

Cruzan dark rum and Dole Pineapple/Orange/Banana juice. Not technically a cordial, but it's tasty and it always makes me cordial. That's all I ask from any libation.

That's what I'm missing.  I forgot to libate.

[Robert Ghostwolf's Ghost]

I have no life...  After searching through YP's posting history, he is telling the truth.  But what is really interesting is that he quoted others who brought up Hitler who are almost all right leaning.

I have a life, but a large part of it is devoted to seeking out pictures of "Kitlers." If I've ever mentioned the artist formerly known as Schicklgruber, it was only in passing and have never used it as a comparison to anyone else. That's a place I don't go, and people who do are worse than Caligula.

[Dr. MD MD]

I have a life, but a large part of it is devoted to seeking out pictures of "Kitlers." If I've ever mentioned the artist formerly known as Schicklgruber, it was only in passing and have never used it as a comparison to anyone else. That's a place I don't go, and people who do are worse than Caligula.

New top Kitler? 

[Robert Ghostwolf's Ghost]

Just pretend Holder is still there running guns to cartels and Lynch is still asking Bill what she should do about Hilary. 

I think you'll find it soothing.

I don't find that soothing at all. On the contrary, it inflames my passions and stirs my loins.

[Dr. MD MD]

I don't find that soothing at all. On the contrary, it inflames my passions and stirs my loins.

You like the bad boys? 

[pyewacket]

I have no life...  After searching through YP's posting history, he is telling the truth.  But what is really interesting is that he quoted others who brought up Hitler who are almost all right leaning.

Pyewacket- Feb 4
DrMDMD- Feb 1
Albrecht- Jan 29
KOK))) - Jan 29
PB - Jan 29
Gravitysucks- Jan 22
Albrecht - Jan 17


In response to Albrecht's post on the 17th, YP did type


Precicely 1350 posts ago, he did type "Hitler."  For the record... The answer is roughly every 2,490,400 seconds YP seems to type that hateful word...

***Damn YP, you post a lot! 

Did you take note of the context of my post?

For those who need some perspective on making these unconscionable comparisons to Hitler in particular:

https://regiehammblog.wordpress.com/2017/02/01/this-hitler-nonsense/

What exactly is your point?

[Dr. MD MD]

Did you take note of the context of my post?

What exactly is your point?

Of course not! They never do. It would be counter to their attempt to point score and feel superior for a brief moment in all their hypocrisy.