• Welcome to BellGab/bellchan Archive.
 

President Donald J. Trump

Started by The General, February 10, 2011, 11:33:34 PM

GravitySucks

Quote from: Got to love an Aston on February 11, 2017, 12:57:24 PM

Why didn't the DoJ name them in their evidence presented to court?

http://cis.org/vaughan/study-reveals-72-terrorists-came-countries-covered-trump-vetting-order

As one of the comments says on the report:


Damn; Statistics!

Getting pretty lazy in your old age, copying other people's comments with no attribution.

Yorkshire pud

Quote from: GravitySucks on February 11, 2017, 01:04:50 PM
Getting pretty lazy in your old age, copying other people's comments with no attribution.


I posted the link
Scroll down.. :)

GravitySucks

Quote from: Got to love an Aston on February 11, 2017, 01:08:42 PM

I posted the link
Scroll down.. :)

Here is the link to the data they mined to come up with the 72. I am not going to go through the whole thing, but there is no info in the report to lend credence to the comment that these all happened before 9/11.

There are plenty of entries for those 7 countries that have charge dates past 2011. Look at lines 41 and 48 for examples.

http://cis.org/sites/cis.org/files/Terror%20Arrests.senate%20judiciary.pdf

Hard to believe these charges weren't filed for over 10 years. I didn't see a column for the date of the offense.

Yorkshire pud

Quote from: GravitySucks on February 11, 2017, 01:20:47 PM
Here is the link to the data they mined to come up with the 72. I am not going to go through the whole thing, but there is no info in the report to lend credence to the comment that these all happened before 9/11.

There are plenty of entries for those 7 countries that have charge dates past 2011. Look at lines 41 and 48 for examples.

http://cis.org/sites/cis.org/files/Terror%20Arrests.senate%20judiciary.pdf

Hard to believe these charges weren't filed for over 10 years. I didn't see a column for the date of the offense.


I think even more interesting are the numbers convicted who are from Turkey, Lebanon, Egypt, Kuwait, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Australia, Uzbekistan, Russia, Not to mention those from The USA.  ;)

Funny that.

Kidnostad3

Quote from: Got to love an Aston on February 11, 2017, 01:52:01 PM

I think even more interesting are the numbers convicted who are from Turkey, Lebanon, Egypt, Kuwait, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Australia, Uzbekistan, Russia, Not to mention those from The USA.  ;)

Funny that.

You seem to be arguing for a ban of immigrants from all Muslim states.  By George I think he's finally gotten it.

GravitySucks

Quote from: Got to love an Aston on February 11, 2017, 01:52:01 PM

I think even more interesting are the numbers convicted who are from Turkey, Lebanon, Egypt, Kuwait, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Australia, Uzbekistan, Russia, Not to mention those from The USA.  ;)

Funny that.

Probably why they didn't want to present it as evidence.

If I was Trump I would halt all immigration. No one could say he was singling out Muslims.

Yorkshire pud


You know how Trump and his circus like to plead about he and only he tells the truth?  ::)

http://www.politifact.com/personalities/donald-trump/statements/byruling/false/

Kidnostad3

Quote from: GravitySucks on February 11, 2017, 02:04:31 PM
Probably why they didn't want to present it as evidence.

If I was Trump I would halt all immigration. No one could say he was singling out Muslims.

Capital idea.  We need to keep out the riff raff.

Yorkshire pud

Quote from: Kidnostad3 on February 11, 2017, 02:03:50 PM
You seem to be arguing for a ban of immigrants from all Muslim states.  By George I think he's finally gotten it.

Nope; I'm not. I'm pointing out how Trump has obviously copied Obama's sanctions because he and his circus havn't done his homework; and they're not smart enough to do so. But hey, I'm sure he'll get the hang of it eventually..How can it possibly be more difficult than living in a gold plated hotel?  ;D

Kidnostad3

Quote from: Got to love an Aston on February 11, 2017, 02:09:03 PM
Nope; I'm not. I'm pointing out how Trump has obviously copied Obama's sanctions because he and his circus havn't done his homework; and they're not smart enough to do so. But hey, I'm sure he'll get the hang of it eventually..How can it possibly be more difficult than living in a gold plated hotel?  ;D

So why weren't Obamas sanctions opposed with the vigor we currently see.  You keep making our point.

Meister_000

Quote from: PB the Deplorable on February 11, 2017, 10:58:12 AM
What the hell are you talking about?
For God's sakes. Over the course of 4 decades these are blips! And it's Berkeley ffs, a college town, and not just any college town. With it's history what else would you expect? This a _very_ big country -- the scale and "threat" (of post-60's) Berkeley has been virtually insignificant. The "mighty" impact of the goings-on in Berkeley were so insignificant you couldn't even feel it 10 miles away across the bay. If you watched the news footage of the SF quake in 1989 you would have thought the entire city was engulfed by fire. It was literally a few buildings in the Marina district.

Yorkshire pud

Quote from: GravitySucks on February 11, 2017, 02:04:31 PM
Probably why they didn't want to present it as evidence.

You really flatter him don't you? They didn't present it because as Trump said in his inaugural speech; They're deprived of all knowledge. They basically made a knee jerk EO that had no validity in law, nor any basis in reality. Still; at least Ivanka knows daddy will keep her back when she's selling her rags.

Quote
If I was Trump I would halt all immigration. No one could say he was singling out Muslims.

But he was; He got Giuliani to formulate the wording to make it appear to not to mention Muslims; it was admitted to Fox. I can always post the pre election speech where Trump specifically calls for a ban on Muslims to bolster your assertion he wasn't singling out Muslims if you want me to?  ;D

Yorkshire pud

Quote from: Kidnostad3 on February 11, 2017, 02:12:22 PM
So why weren't Obamas sanctions opposed with the vigor we currently see.  You keep making our point.

But they were. Go look at the facts rather than what Trump and Spicer are spouting. It takes years for a potential immigrant or refugee to get into the USA; it has (and did well before Trump took office) the most stringent immigration protocol in the world.

Just because Trump made chaos for a week in US airports didn't prove his point. All it did was piss off a lot of legitimate passengers, and residents, no doubt including the NSA officers who weren't told this was being put in place until it happened.

Kidnostad3

Quote from: Meister_000 on February 11, 2017, 02:14:43 PM

For God's sakes.


Does anyone else get he idea that Meister is constantly on the brink of histeria!  She must be a female or a hyper sensitive male drama queen.  How long have you been a member of the NEA?


GravitySucks

Quote from: Got to love an Aston on February 11, 2017, 02:15:20 PM
You really flatter him don't you? They didn't present it because as Trump said in his inaugural speech; They're deprived of all knowledge. They basically made a knee jerk EO that had no validity in law, nor any basis in reality. Still; at least Ivanka knows daddy will keep her back when she's selling her rags.

But he was; He got Giuliani to formulate the wording to make it appear to not to mention Muslims; it was admitted to Fox. I can always post the pre election speech where Trump specifically calls for a ban on Muslims to bolster your assertion he wasn't singling out Muslims if you want me to?  ;D

You act as though I would think singling out Muslims would be a bad thing.

Kidnostad3

Quote from: Got to love an Aston on February 11, 2017, 02:19:24 PM
But they were. Go look at the facts rather than what Trump and Spicer are spouting. It takes years for a potential immigrant or refugee to get into the USA; it has (and did well before Trump took office) the most stringent immigration protocol in the world.



Did the state of a Washington sue or did the Ninth Circuit intervene?  If so my memory is failing me.

Yorkshire pud

Quote from: GravitySucks on February 11, 2017, 02:29:23 PM
You act as though I would think singling out Muslims would be a bad thing.

Whether you think it right or wrong is frankly irrelevant; its illegal on one hand, and completely counter productive on the other. I'm sure I don't have to point out why. I hope I don't.  :-\

Yorkshire pud

Quote from: Kidnostad3 on February 11, 2017, 02:31:36 PM

Did the state of a Washington sue or did the Ninth Circuit intervene?  If so my memory is failing me.


What are you talking about? The immigration service deal with it. And the immigration officers at airports.

Kidnostad3

Quote from: GravitySucks on February 11, 2017, 02:29:23 PM
You act as though I would think singling out Muslims would be a bad thing.

I'll go you one better.  I think the government should take a hard look at the muslims that are in this country with a view towards revoking green cards and even the citizenship of those bent on creating havoc and imposing sharia law. 


Yorkshire pud

Quote from: Kidnostad3 on February 11, 2017, 02:36:14 PM
I'll go you one better.  I think the government should take a hard look at the muslims that are in this country with a view towards revoking green cards and even the citizenship of those bent on creating havoc and imposing sharia law.

How are you on white supremacists who commit atrocities? Or would you just give them a pass? What about government officials discussing security measures with a non friendly government? They're okay too?

SredniVashtar

Quote from: Kidnostad3 on February 11, 2017, 02:24:05 PM
Does anyone else get he idea that Meister is constantly on the brink of histeria!  She must be a female or a hyper sensitive male drama queen.  How long have you been a member of the NEA?

A put-down gains slightly more weight if you can actually spell it correctly, you dismally nescient cunt.

Kidnostad3

Quote from: Got to love an Aston on February 11, 2017, 02:37:53 PM
How are you on white supremacists who commit atrocities? Or would you just give them a pass?

They should be prosecuted to the limits of the law and are.  Have you forgotten that we executed McVeigh? 

Kidnostad3

Quote from: SredniVashtar on February 11, 2017, 02:41:11 PM
A put-down gains slightly more weight if you can actually spell it correctly, you dismally nescient cunt.

Oh it's the grammar and spelling Queen back from a hard day at the men's bath house.  Do you have anything to say about the topic under discussion or are you just lurking about.

Yorkshire pud

Quote from: Kidnostad3 on February 11, 2017, 02:41:49 PM
They should be prosecuted to the limits of the law and are.  Have you forgotten that we executed McVeigh?

Not at all. But I noted how so far Trump hasn't mentioned the attack in Canada that killed several people, but did mention the failed attack in Paris.

Kidnostad3

Quote from: Got to love an Aston on February 11, 2017, 02:48:57 PM
Not at all. But I noted how so far Trump hasn't mentioned the attack in Canada that killed several people, but did mention the failed attack in Paris.


He made a press release on the Canadian mass shooting.  Would you rather he tweeted?

Quote from: Kidnostad3 on February 11, 2017, 02:48:19 PM
Oh it's the grammar and spelling Queen back from a hard day at the men's bath house.  Do you have anything to say about the topic under discussion or are you just lurking about.
hahaha! Lurking about is what he does best.

Kidnostad3

Quote from: SredniVashtar on February 11, 2017, 02:41:11 PMdismally nescient cunt.

FERRETT BOY

I mentioned that I served with Brit military officers and other ranks and had dealings with them on a daily basis for three years.   I also enjoyed socializing with them not only during happy hours and parties but at dinners in my home and in theirs.  I have also spent time with Brit AF personnel in other settings such as the British Embassy in Washington, the Admiralty in London and several other places in the U.K. and Europe.  For the most part I was impressed with their urbanity, intelligence and professionalism.

I think it's fair to say that I have had the pleasure of knowing some of your best and brightest.  In the many verbal and written exchanges I have had with my Brit colleagues, I have never heard one use the pretentious style and affected tone that you most often use.  Moreover, none of them cycled between being a pedantic tight ass on the one hand and a thuggish Birmingham City fan on the other even when they  were shit faced.   While allowing for the nature of this forum, I can't escape the impression that you are one who is trying too hard to sound very British and very intellectual and in so doing come off like some bilious character out of a P.G. Wodehouse novel.  I think my Brit friends would refer to you as a "Cod."  Consider this constructive criticism. 

Quote from: Kidnostad3 on February 11, 2017, 03:00:15 PM
I think my Brit friends would refer to you as a "Cod." 
I think you meant to say "pouff".

SredniVashtar

Quote from: Inglorious Bitch on February 11, 2017, 03:03:43 PM
I think you meant to say "pouff".

You two should team up together on the short bus.

Yorkshire pud

Quote from: Kidnostad3 on February 11, 2017, 03:00:15 PM
FERRETT BOY

I mentioned that I served with Brit military officers and other ranks and had dealings with them on a daily basis for three years.   I also enjoyed socializing with them not only during happy hours and parties but at dinners in my home and in theirs.  I have also spent time with Brit AF personnel in other settings such as the British Embassy in Washington, the Admiralty in London and several other places in the U.K. and Europe.  For the most part I was impressed with their urbanity, intelligence and professionalism.

I think it's fair to say that I have had the pleasure of knowing some of your best and brightest.  In the many verbal and written exchanges I have had with my Brit colleagues, I have never heard one use the pretentious style and affected tone that you most often use.  Moreover, none of them cycled between being a pedantic tight ass on the one hand and a thuggish Birmingham City* fan on the other even when they  were shit faced.   While allowing for the nature of this forum, I can't escape the impression that you are one who is trying too hard to sound very British and very intellectual and in so doing come off like some bilious character out of a P.G. Wodehouse novel.  I think my Brit friends** would refer to you as a "Cod."  Consider this constructive criticism.

That would be Millwall, or possibly Cardiff City; SV is quite posh; naturally when I say posh, I mean a southern jessie.

**Friends? Define. I have no idea what the 'cod' means. Is it an acronym?

Powered by SMFPacks Menu Editor Mod