• Welcome to BellGab/bellchan Archive.
 

Hillary Clinton

Started by albrecht, June 21, 2014, 09:05:45 AM



Need to change Hillary nickname to "1% BATTERY"

albrecht

According to report Billary wanted special stool to make up for her short stature but was rejected but they are allowing her to have a "custom build podium." I'm not sure what that entails? Grab bars, seat, stool? Also "coughing breaks" reportedly won't be allowed and mics not turned off or manipulated and no breaks in the debate. It might be be tough on her: having to stand and talk. No wonder she is resting and taking some time off. Have to prepare for that hard task of standing and talking.

The campaign is still struggling with making her "appear human" and "likeable."
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/is-she-likable-enough/2016/09/23/5c8fd252-80e0-11e6-a52d-9a865a0ed0d4_story.html

Jackstar

Quote from: TigerLily on September 22, 2016, 05:27:57 PM
Hillary is so stiff she could be used to model coffins.

Greetings Starfighter. You have been recruited by The Star League to defend The Frontier against Xur and the Ko-Dan Armada.

Lunger

Can't wait for the debates!

Uh-oh, Hillary better get out to California quick.  As Kim Kardashian goes, so goes the nation.


http://www.ew.com/article/2016/09/23/kim-kardashian-donald-trump




What in the ever loving fuck is this brain dead woman thinking?

http://www.wsj.com/articles/hillary-clinton-proposes-65-tax-on-largest-estates-1474559914

QuoteDemocratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton would levy a 65% tax on the largest estates and make it harder for wealthy people to pass appreciated assets to their heirs without paying taxes, expanding the list of tax increases she would impose on the top sliver of America’s affluent.

The estate-tax increase and other new proposals that Mrs. Clinton detailed on Thursday would generate $260 billion over the next decade, enough to pay for her plans to simplify small business taxes and expand the child tax credit, according to the nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, which advocates fiscal restraint.

In all, Mrs. Clinton would increase taxes by about $1.5 trillion over the next decade, increasing federal revenue by about 4%, though that new burden would be concentrated on relatively few households. There is at least a $6 trillion gap between her plan and the tax cuts proposed by her Republican rival Donald Trump.

The Clinton campaign changed its previous planâ€"which called for a 45% top rateâ€"by adding three new tax brackets and adopting the structure proposed by Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont during the Democratic primaries. She would impose a 50% rate that would apply to estates over $10 million a person, a 55% rate that starts at $50 million a person, and the top rate of 65%, which would affect only those with assets exceeding $500 million for a single person and $1 billion for married couples.

This is going push every non-brain dead celebrity and rich person into Trump's camp. Kardashian was just the first and she's generally a trend setter. You're going to see a slew of the rich and fabulous come out of the Trump closet in the next few weeks because of this.

Quote from: VoteQuimby on September 23, 2016, 03:43:09 PM
What in the ever loving fuck is this brain dead woman thinking?

http://www.wsj.com/articles/hillary-clinton-proposes-65-tax-on-largest-estates-1474559914

This is going push every non-brain dead celebrity and rich person into Trump's camp. Kardashian was just the first and she's generally a trend setter. You're going to see a slew of the rich and fabulous come out of the Trump closet in the next few weeks because of this.

Something is odd.  It's always been her race to lose and it's like each day she tries harder and harder to blow it.

aldousburbank

Quote from: VoteQuimby on September 23, 2016, 03:43:09 PM
What in the ever loving fuck is this brain dead woman thinking?

http://www.wsj.com/articles/hillary-clinton-proposes-65-tax-on-largest-estates-1474559914

This is going push every non-brain dead celebrity and rich person into Trump's camp. Kardashian was just the first and she's generally a trend setter. You're going to see a slew of the rich and fabulous come out of the Trump closet in the next few weeks because of this.

Let me get this straight- Ted Cruz AND the Kim K coming out for the Donald? Damn! I might have to change my mind and be against him.  :(

Quote from: Walks_At_Night on September 23, 2016, 03:46:57 PM
Something is odd.  It's always been her race to lose and it's like each day she tries harder and harder to blow it.

This is what drives me INSANE about liberals is they don't read. They want to talk about how Trump has no plans and blah blah blah. Bullshit, Trump's economic and tax plan is brilliant. It's very simple to understand. It's accessible to anyone who wants to read it. This guy wants to get rid of the IRS, make the tax system actually logical and fair and stop getting gangraped in international trade deals.

Hillary's economic plans are schizophrenic and almost as insane as Bernie's. This woman is telling you she wants to raise taxes on the middle class and she was to penalize success. On top of that she wants to institute measures that will basically destroy America as a first world economic power. Now she wants to take 50% of successful peoples' wealth when they die and up to 65% depending how successful you are. This woman is literally pissing on everyone with her economic plans and no one is talking about this stuff.

Here's Breitbart's take on it.



http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/09/23/hillary-clinton-wants-higher-estate-taxes-but-not-on-her-family/

QuoteHillary Clinton wants to increase the estate tax to 65 percent on the wealthiest Americans,  according to her latest tax plan.
The Clinton campaign estimates that the increase would raise an addition $75 billion in revenue over the next decade. The current rate maxes out at 40 percent.

But Hillary Clinton and her husband Bill have created a number of tax shelters in recent years to dramatically limit their payment of the very same tax. As Bloomberg reported back in 2014: “To reduce the tax pinch, the Clintons are using financial planning strategies befitting the top 1 percent of U.S. households in wealth.”

In 2010 the Clinton created “residential trusts” and the following year moved their Chappaqua estate into the trust,  according to their financial records. As David Scott Sloan,  a partner at the firm Holland Knight explained the Clinton trust to CBS News, “You’re creating things that are going to be on the nontaxable side of the balance sheet when they die.”

The move will save the Clintons hundreds of thousands of dollars in estate taxes, according to accountants quoted by Bloomberg.

Even more substantial, the Clintons created a life insurance trust in 2010, which will shelter life insurance payments from estate taxes. This is their second such trust. The first was created in 1996, according to financial disclosures.

albrecht

Quote from: VoteQuimby on September 23, 2016, 03:43:09 PM
What in the ever loving fuck is this brain dead woman thinking?

http://www.wsj.com/articles/hillary-clinton-proposes-65-tax-on-largest-estates-1474559914

This is going push every non-brain dead celebrity and rich person into Trump's camp. Kardashian was just the first and she's generally a trend setter. You're going to see a slew of the rich and fabulous come out of the Trump closet in the next few weeks because of this.
I would hope so but committed rich leftists always figure out a way around the rules. What they and Hillary are really trying to do is break up family farms, ranches, businesses, etc. I can't tell from the article but in there it said she wants to eliminate "step-up in basis," for everyone or just the mega-rich. That alone would kill people inheriting stocks, etc. Normal people, not just the mega-rich.


albrecht

Obama's FBI releases some more of Hillary's emails. Late on a Friday of course.
https://vault.fbi.gov/hillary-r.-clinton/hillary-r.-clinton-part-03-of-03/view

Value Of Pi

Quote from: aldousburbank on September 23, 2016, 03:49:45 PM
Let me get this straight- Ted Cruz AND the Kim K coming out for the Donald? Damn! I might have to change my mind and be against him.  :(

You can't do the guilt-by-association thing. It's just not fair. Except in this case. In this case, you have no choice but to go with it, no choice at all.

Dr. MD MD

I think Hillary only has one shot at redemption in this election. She has to present herself as the world's biggest whistleblower. All the email leaks are just her attempt at bringing a corrupt government down. She's really a hero!  ;)

GravitySucks

Quote from: Dr. MD MD on September 23, 2016, 06:16:55 PM
I think Hillary only has one shot at redemption in this election. She has to present herself as the world's biggest whistleblower. All the email leaks are just her attempt at bringing a corrupt government down. She's really a hero!  ;)

albrecht

Billary just announced she will not be going to Charlotte for some rally or fundraiser, I guess she needs more rest to prepare for the arduous task of being able to stand and talk Monday. Or, maybe she, like any rational human, doesn't want to go to an area with rioting people, or as she calls blacks, "super predators."

GravitySucks

Quote from: albrecht on September 23, 2016, 08:04:21 PM
Billary just announced she will not be going to Charlotte for some rally or fundraiser, I guess she needs more rest to prepare for the arduous task of being able to stand and talk Monday. Or, maybe she, like any rational human, doesn't want to go to an area with rioting people, or as she calls blacks, "super predators."

She reads this board and saw my comments about crossing a state line to incite a riot.

albrecht

Quote from: GravitySucks on September 23, 2016, 08:09:38 PM
She reads this board and saw my comments about crossing a state line to incite a riot.
Ha. I wonder what her handle is on this board?


Quote from: GravitySucks on September 23, 2016, 08:22:28 PM
Hillary lost another voter in Virginia

http://wtop.com/prince-william-county/2016/09/va-woman-riding-mattress-top-van-dies-fall/

Cripes.   I guess picking up some cord at the Tru Value Hardware was too much of a bother.




TigerLily

Hillary Clinton for President - New York Times

"In any normal election year, we'd compare the two presidential candidates side by side on the issues. But this is not a normal election year," the paper wrote. "A comparison like that would be an empty exercise in a race where one candidate -- our choice, Hillary Clinton -- has a record of service and a raft of pragmatic ideas, and the other, Donald Trump, discloses nothing concrete about himself or his plans while promising the moon and offering the stars on layaway." ...

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/25/opinion/sunday/hillary-clinton-for-president.html

Quote from: TigerLily on September 24, 2016, 01:47:14 PM
Hillary Clinton for President - New York Times

"In any normal election year, we'd compare the two presidential candidates side by side on the issues. But this is not a normal election year," the paper wrote. "A comparison like that would be an empty exercise in a race where one candidate -- our choice, Hillary Clinton -- has a record of service and a raft of pragmatic ideas, and the other, Donald Trump, discloses nothing concrete about himself or his plans while promising the moon and offering the stars on layaway." ...

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/25/opinion/sunday/hillary-clinton-for-president.html

Surprise, surprise!

NOT!

Like who couldn't see this coming a year ago?  I automatically vote against the endorsement of the NY Times Editorial page. That's a no-brainer.

Dr. MD MD

Quote from: TigerLily on September 24, 2016, 01:47:14 PM
Hillary Clinton for President - New York Times

"In any normal election year, we'd compare the two presidential candidates side by side on the issues. But this is not a normal election year," the paper wrote. "A comparison like that would be an empty exercise in a race where one candidate -- our choice, Hillary Clinton -- has a record of service and a raft of pragmatic ideas, and the other, Donald Trump, discloses nothing concrete about himself or his plans while promising the moon and offering the stars on layaway." ...

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/25/opinion/sunday/hillary-clinton-for-president.html

To me, this is just more proof of how she has the media in her big foundation pocket. I just can't take this propaganda seriously anymore.  ;)

Quote from: TigerLily on September 24, 2016, 01:47:14 PM
Hillary Clinton for President - New York Times

"In any normal election year, we'd compare the two presidential candidates side by side on the issues. But this is not a normal election year," the paper wrote. "A comparison like that would be an empty exercise in a race where one candidate -- our choice, Hillary Clinton -- has a record of service and a raft of pragmatic ideas, and the other, Donald Trump, discloses nothing concrete about himself or his plans while promising the moon and offering the stars on layaway." ...

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/25/opinion/sunday/hillary-clinton-for-president.html

Jesus.

albrecht

Quote from: 21st Century Man on September 24, 2016, 01:55:47 PM
Surprise, surprise!

NOT!

Like who couldn't see this coming a year ago?  I automatically vote against the endorsement of the NY Times Editorial page. That's a no-brainer.
I look at the people so vehement against Trump and it leads to me to support him. He wasn't my initial choice but 1 )anybody but Clinton and 2) the more Hollywood types and propagandists ("media") hate makes him a better candidate in my eyes.

Powered by SMFPacks Menu Editor Mod