• Welcome to BellGab/bellchan Archive.
 

George Noory Sucks! - The Definitive Compendium

Started by MV/Liberace!, April 06, 2008, 12:23:02 AM

Can Noory pronounce anything correctly?

No
No
Quote from: Morgus on July 20, 2016, 01:23:28 PM
Noory always says "firepower" regarding computers when what he really means is "CPU processing power"
Noory thinks the computers are weapons?

Bet you he thinks you can start fires with the magnifying app like you can with a real magnifying glass. Now that's some real 'firepower'! Just think, start all your grills and campfires now with the new C2C Firepower app.

Robert

Quote from: Morgus on July 20, 2016, 01:23:28 PMNoory always says "firepower" regarding computers when what he really means is "CPU processing power"
Noory thinks the computers are weapons?
No, he thinks they're cooking tools.  Like for pizza rolls.

Robert

Quote from: ItsOver on July 20, 2016, 03:13:37 PMJorch doesn't seem too receptive to criticism, if several thousand posts on BellGab are any indication.
He learned to pronounce "turmeric" properly, didn't he?

OTOH, John Batchelor's exaggerated mispronunciation of "entrepreneur" seems to be his trademark.  One on-air guest even tried to get him to correct it, while making fun of it.


pate

Dave, yes Dave awesome arrrgh, yew:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2iE4uEsaBF0

Not Sure, Y.

Soothing butt-balmy...

Quote from: ItsOver on July 20, 2016, 03:13:37 PM
Jorch doesn't seem too receptive to criticism, if several thousand posts on BellGab are any indication.  Tommy is smart enough to play "yes man" to Jorch, since Jorch is his meal ticket.  And Tommy needs a LOT of meals.
There is a "Tommy" at every workplace.


Juan Cena



I call in to ask  MJ the guest why the Anunaki used humans to mine gold as opposed to robots which were easier to control and would be more efficient and wouldn't wear out as easy. Dave decides to cut in and say "don't you think they wanted to seed Earth?" Thus giving MJ an lazy answer to a logical question.

Tommee (or whoever was screening) did say I had a great question, though. He was probably shocked because no one asked it before.

Quote from: Paper*Boy on July 17, 2016, 06:43:18 AM
You will never find anyone that agrees with you on every single policy, let alone an entire organization that does.  Even if you found someone who agreed on every single thing, you may differ on the amount of something like the food stamp benefit.  Even if you were in complete agreement, you may change your mind about this or that from time to time, then what?

The default should never be 'well, let's just vote for the Socialists because they promise to give everything to everyone'

I said not one alternative party even got through to me, not even the Socialists, even though I'm pretty flexible on issues especially now when neither major candidate is right!  I would gladly sacrifice my stance on a couple issues just ro find a better President than these two!

I never said "total agreement" is necessary, but it's crucial to be moderate on major national issues if you want to be elected.  No one is going to elect a wing nut.  (Unless Trump wins.)

I never felt "everything needed to be given" to everyone, just that Libertarians want to entirely end food stamps.  You made it sound like they want to change the amount but actually their site says put an end to food stamps.

My point was: Until these third politcal parties learn to at least be moderate on mainstream issues they will never get anywhere. People will just keep the two major parties in.

When I say the other parties shoot themselves in the foot, I meant big-time disqualifiers, not henpecking decisions.  I want a third party.  That's why I did my study.  I am quite flexible, having voted for almost every party on the ballot at times.  So, if I can't find a decent third party candidate among them this time, then I don't think most other people could.  I gave their platforms the benefit of any doubt and looked hard for the positives in things.  I wanted hard to find a candidate to vote for, other than mainstream ones.  There just wasn't one there.

Most of their grammer was good, but some didn't list a platform.  I was very interested in the Workers Party, but their only communication venue seemed to be Facebook.  No platform?  I couldn't find it.  Come on, they have been around for years and it seemed like they didn't even play ball. By showing a platform.  Oh yeah, like I found my Prezident on zee Facebook!  Come on!

The most viable candidate was the Veterans Party, but do you really trust the judgment of a man who elaborates about how abortion is not a Presidential issue, on and on seriously, only to undermine his own honor afterward by turning his card anyway.  He showed his bias over an issue he admitted was none of his prospective business.  An everyday salesperson even knows not to do that.  It was strategically irresponsible.  I was so disappointed, not so much in his stance on abortion as in the way he handled self-disclosure.  He wasn't politic.  I'm all for honesty but everyone knows there is a time to keep yourself silent.  All that money for the campaign, then to lose half the audience by disclosing something he himself said was completely irrelevant.  Then again maybe I just disagreed with his stance - at this point it no longer matters because I ruled him out.  If he hadn't elaborated so much about how irrelevant the issue was to the Presidency, I would have just disagreed with his stance.  But now I question his judgment and disagree with his stance.  Wanting a third party candidate so much, I might have overlooked the abortion issue, but I can't overlook a candidate who preaches and then caves anyway all in the same document.

We need moderate alternative parties.  They would open the door so the other parties would eventually follow, in moderation! 

Why doesn't Henry Louis Gates run?  Why doesn't Eric Holder run?  Did Jesse Jackson not have a protege???  Aren't there any judges who want to rule?  C'mon, being your gavel to the Executive Order room, lol!  Please, someone.  There have got to be millions of qualified civilian, military, law enforcement people.  There are skilled, effective, reliable, ethical, energetic, hard-working, smart, supported people in every arena.  We need you!  Don't you want to pick out a China pattern?!  You get to pick two of them.

Are you afraid?  What about duty?  Someone out there has a duty to lead us. We need you.

What kind of country are you (those people and their friends) leading us into by not running? Seriously. My current candidate choices are a wiife who is still married to someone who made a mockery of marriage or a business tycoon who if I understand it right has offended everyone and is purchasing his way in?  Forgive me if I'm wrong.  This is how it looks to me.

This post is not copyrighted.  Please just leave out the part about the abortion thing because let's not get personal.  Other than that, I release this post from claims if re-distributed.

Quote from: Juan Cena on July 21, 2016, 01:32:59 AM

I call in to ask  MJ the guest why the Anunaki used humans to mine gold as opposed to robots which were easier to control and would be more efficient and wouldn't wear out as easy. Dave decides to cut in and say "don't you think they wanted to seed Earth?" Thus giving MJ an lazy answer to a logical question.

Tommee (or whoever was screening) did say I had a great question, though. He was probably shocked because no one asked it before.

That is a good question.  Too bad Noory blew it off.

Quote from: ItsOver on July 19, 2016, 03:41:34 AM
From "Talkers,"

Coast to Coast AM from Boise.  Nationally syndicated late-night star George Noory (left) poses for a photo with KIDO, Boise morning drive personality Kevin Miller (right) backstage at the Egyptian Theater in Boise during a visit to the city.  The Premiere Networks-syndicated “Coast to Coast AM” personality was in town for a live show at the Egyptian Theater.  Also pictured here is Noory Productions president Tom Danheiser (c).



Tommy is in some kind of unholy alliance, of course, with Jorch for scamming bucks, among other things.  Tommy is Jorch's gopher for running "Beeyond Beeleef!" and setting-up Noory's singing revivals, such as the upcoming Asheville suck-fest.  Jorch is always plugging his ghost-written books, crap holiday music CD's, "Beeyond Beeleef!," and on-the-road suckfests during C2C.

It's hard for me to believe Noory doesn't have some kind of agreement with PremRat for all his bilking operations but who'd believe any operation that wasn't asleep at the wheel would let Jorch pretend to be a radio show host for all these years.  Maybe that's how he's managed to maintain his position, by funneling a percentage of his take back to PremRat.  Follow the money.

FYI, lol, according to LinkedIn, it's George Noory Prductions....  really, Prductions, not Productions...
Maybe he's chasing dough for extortion.  I guess Oprah has had to deal with a lot of that.

Quote from: Little Hater on July 20, 2016, 03:35:56 AM
..."exciting as all get up."

That was so funny !!!!!!!!!!   Ha, ha, hilarious. For all his cockiness, he sure gets doses of humbling moments.  Remember that time he couldn't say a word so after break he said he would prove himself by saying it right.  And tried about 5 more times, to no avail?

And is Catechetic still cataclysm?  I think the show is tons of fun.

Quote from: ItsOver on July 19, 2016, 04:35:39 AM
I'd like to think so.  Of course, we have an entire forum that would would like to think this.  Unfortunately, I turned on C2C a week or so ago just long enough to hear Jorch bragging one more time about his contract and how he was going to be on C2C forever, for our listening pleasure.  :P  Jorch will be torturing the airwaves until PremRat drags him out of the studio.  I don't see him leaving on his own volition.

Pay no attention to Noorie's talk of his contract. Back when I listened Noorie claimed every other week to have signed a new long term deal.

ItsOver

Quote from: loveslibraries on July 21, 2016, 03:11:45 AM
FYI, lol, according to LinkedIn, it's George Noory Prductions....  really, Prductions, not Productions...
Maybe he's chasing dough for extortion.  I guess Oprah has had to deal with a lot of that.
Ha!  Prductions.  That sounds exactly the way Jorch would pronounce productions.

https://www.linkedin.com/in/george-noory-53795524

George Noory
President at George Noory Prductions
Greater Los Angeles AreaBroadcast Media
Current   


Book Author / Publisher at American Media Legacy Communications
United States

Quote from: ItsOver on July 21, 2016, 03:40:19 AM
Ha!  Prductions.  That sounds exactly the way Jorch would pronounce productions.

The Prductions company sure has a lot of talent so far:





ItsOver

And to add further mystery to the great Jorch.

https://www.linkedin.com/in/george-noory-77681b9b?trk=prof-samename-name



George Noory
Book Author / Publisher at American Media Legacy Communications
Greater Salt Lake City AreaWriting and Editing
Current   
American Media Legacy Communications
Previous   
Weber State University, Utah Valley University
Education   
Weber State University

Summary
I am an author, writer, publisher and itinerant curiosity seeker. I research, write, strategize, analyze and galvanize industry thought on topics related to member loyalty and engagement.

Experience
Book Author / Publisher
American Media Legacy Communications
January 2010 â€" Present (6 years 7 months)
Author of many non-fiction titles related to inspiration and humanity. Titles include regional best-seller "Life Lessons from Fathers of Faith" and its companion "Life Lessons from Mothers of Faith," featuring intimate and inspiring stories from people like Senator Harry Reid, Mitt Romney, Academy Award winning producer Gerald Molen, Hall of Fame Quarterback Steve Young, New York Times Bestselling author Stephen R. Covey, hotel magnate J.W. Marriott, Olympian Peter Vidmar, and many more politicians, businessmen, and professional athletes. Previous titles also include The Quiet Hero: The Untold Medal of Honor Story of George E. Wahlen (2009, 2006), with a contribution from Sen. Bob Dole. New titles are currently under development.

Associate Director/Alumni
Weber State University
November 2004 â€" January 2010 (5 years 3 months)
Managed the Alumni Association's membership program, building membership 400% within three years. Developed and implemented a strategic engagement plan that was the framework building young alumni participation. Wrote and designed multiple successful member campaigns, especially email campaigns when no one else was doing it. Organized, developed and managed a student call center which had doubled membership and individual donors to the university within two years. Negotiated affinity partnerships which doubled the Association's annual income, and securing its financial stability for nearly a decade. Wrote, produced and directed video profiles of distinguished alumni and friends, and establishing an annual awards gala that became the University's most prestigious awards event. Created, implemented and wrote the university's monthly electronic newsletter; Contributor to the University’s alumni magazine.

Is Jorch leading a double life?

ItsOver

Quote from: nooryisawesome on July 21, 2016, 03:45:14 AM
The Prductions company sure has a lot of talent so far:





It looks like the morning roll-call at San Quentin.  Jorch, in his "Touch of Gray" period, pre-Simoniz Nitro Xtreme tire shine days.

Little Hater

Quote from: michio on July 20, 2016, 05:11:54 PM

sNoory will be adding "law enforcement training instructor" to his resume of talents and professions, be it normal or paranormal.

Been there, done that.

From Wikipedia (or as Noory calls it, 'Wiki'):

"In St. Louis, Noory formed Norcom Entertainment, Inc., a company that developed and marketed video training films to law enforcement and security agencies."

ItsOver

Quote from: Little Hater on July 21, 2016, 03:58:50 AM
Been there, done that.

From Wikipedia (or as Noory calls it, 'Wiki'):

"In St. Louis, Noory formed Norcom Entertainment, Inc., a company that developed and marketed video training films to law enforcement and security agencies."
Ah, yes.  Norcom.  I remember that tidbit of Jorch trivia.  For some reason, I always want to say Moroncom.


Quote from: loveslibraries on July 21, 2016, 01:46:59 AM
...  I would gladly sacrifice my stance on a couple issues just ro find a better President than these two!

I never said "total agreement" is necessary, but it's crucial to be moderate on major national issues if you want to be elected.  No one is going to elect a wing nut....

This is the worst choice presented to us in our history.  However, either will be better than what we elected the last two times. 

I don't think either of them are personal friends with domestic terrorists, Hamas mouthpieces, have pastors that openly state their hatred for the country, will make it a priority to sow race hatred, etc.  I think both Hilary or Trump would be a little less open about ignoring court orders, ignoring the limits of their office, supporting certain long time enemies and standing by while others are on the move, abandoning long time US foreign policy goals and tossing out hard fought containment agreements, deliberately frustrating and endangering our allies, or be so keen on projecting weakness around the world.

No, Hilary will mostly just continue dodging one corruption and criminal scandal after another, while continuing the tide of new Democrat voters pouring over our borders, and Trump will be an ineffective idiot.  Meanwhile our enemies will become more emboldened and the world will become more and more dangerous to us, our allies and trading partners.

Obviously, food stamps are pretty low on the list for me

I'll take a 'wingnut' over any of this anytime.


By the way, about something like food stamps.  This is an example of an enormously popular program that would never go away no matter who was president, and what their personal thoughts and preferences are.  Farmers like it, poor people like it, people who value a safety net like it - it would never get through Congress, even one house let alone both.

It's just this sort of 'issue' Big Media and the Left love to put out there and attack.  ''Oh (fill in the blank) is for/against (fill in the blank), therefore they shouldn't be elected''.  Never mind whatever it is would never get passed, and never mind a large percent of their other positions are just what the country needs, and never mind that very little of what Big Media and the 'Progressives' want is anything but destructive.


Robert

Quote from: loveslibraries on July 21, 2016, 01:46:59 AMI said not one alternative party even got through to me, not even the Socialists, even though I'm pretty flexible on issues especially now when neither major candidate is right!  I would gladly sacrifice my stance on a couple issues just ro find a better President than these two!

I never said "total agreement" is necessary, but it's crucial to be moderate on major national issues if you want to be elected.  No one is going to elect a wing nut.  (Unless Trump wins.)

I never felt "everything needed to be given" to everyone, just that Libertarians want to entirely end food stamps.  You made it sound like they want to change the amount but actually their site says put an end to food stamps.

My point was: Until these third politcal parties learn to at least be moderate on mainstream issues they will never get anywhere. People will just keep the two major parties in.
But the Libertarian Party did nominate candidates for prez & VP who are only moderately libertarian. I didn't know what Gary Johnson said about cutting food stamps, so I Googled just now & found this -- https://twitter.com/govgaryjohnson/status/433428292323278848 -- which says "Food Stamps would exist, but would be cut back along with ALL federal expenditures."  That's consistent with what he proposes for Social Security: introduction of means testing for benefits, and a gradual increase in the eligibility age, until it's in long-term fiscal balance.  Cuts, not abolition.  And this is the 2nd consecutive prez election he's gotten the nomination for, so it's not like the party didn't know what they were in for.

In general, candidates ignore political party platforms anyway, so why take the word of the minor parties' conventions, rather than that of the candidates they nominate? In other words, why should voters take the platforms more seriously than the candidates do?

NevadaGuy2011

Sigh.....another "Gold Show" where everything with the economy is going to hell and the only real solution is to buy gold and silver.  Has George or his guest mentioned that in the last five years gold is down over 16% and silver is down over 49%, and that if his listeners took his advice in 2011 to buy gold and silver they would have lost their shirts?  Of course not.  Let's buy gold and silver but not real estate.  Where does GN find these financial hacks?

Another thing George does that is annoying is when he goes into break he says "we will be back" then when he returns from break he says "welcome back."  Is he welcoming back himself?

Then there are the typical complains with George that I also have....he doesn't listen to his guests and often will cut off a guest who is giving an interesting answer just to ask an irrelevant question. 

Are you a Coast Insider yet?  George will only ask you to become one 50 times a show.  He will say "amazing" and "unbelievable" a few hundred times a night.  He has no self awareness at all. 

George must have naked photos of the boss.  I can't come up with any other explanation as to why he still hosts a national show.   

George....you truly do suck balls. 

zeebo

Quote from: NevadaGuy2011 on July 21, 2016, 10:57:49 PM
Sigh.....another "Gold Show" where everything with the economy is going to hell and the only real solution is to buy gold and silver. ...

If I heard correctly the dude promotes a full 40% towards precious metals?  George then asks him what 'asset allocation' is all about and finds out how important 'diversification' is.   ::)

zeebo

George asks "How much does a bag of coins weigh?"

zeebo

Caller:  "What do you call it when you drive your car and push the button to go at a constant speed?"

George:  "Auto control"

Jeez I tune in for ten minutes and hear more stupid stuff than I've heard all week elsewhere.

NevadaGuy2011

Quote from: zeebo on July 21, 2016, 11:46:50 PM
George asks "How much does a bag of coins weigh?"

LOL, I couldn't believe how stupid that was.  Then he asked "would the bag break?"  He tried to play off like it was a trick question and he was being funny or something.  That was so bad. 

NevadaGuy2011

Quote from: zeebo on July 21, 2016, 11:53:12 PM
Caller:  "What do you call it when you drive your car and push the button to go at a constant speed?"

George:  "Auto control"

Jeez I tune in for ten minutes and hear more stupid stuff than I've heard all week elsewhere.

That was another gem.  I'm an idiot when it comes to how cars work and even I knew that was wrong. 

Quote from: zeebo on July 21, 2016, 11:46:50 PM
George asks "How much does a bag of coins weigh?"

About a buck twenty five?

Looks like I missed some prime Noory Fun with Fonics and other Sounds tonight.   

Powered by SMFPacks Menu Editor Mod