• Welcome to BellGab/bellchan Archive.
 

President Donald J. Trump

Started by The General, February 10, 2011, 11:33:34 PM


paladin1991

Quote from: Dr. MD MD on March 06, 2017, 03:30:11 PM
I done goofed! Of course, you'd be the one to catch me.  ::)

Drop and 50?  ???

Or you can join me in Yorkshire and pull your pud.



paladin1991

Quote from: (((The King of Kings))) on March 06, 2017, 05:43:11 PM


Trump is still Making America Great Again.

One less diseased ridden and degenerate idiot.


Oh noes!  Isn't that Jesus Juice's androgynous avatar?

aldousburbank

Quote from: Pulling my Pud in Yorkshire on March 06, 2017, 06:15:06 PM
Doobie Brothers? 

https://youtu.be/t3W3IzQ5sDM?list=PL-9-kSrWOe9q_0aazLThVJf9DlMnLtNS1

Naw man, it was like, Carlos Santana opening up for Los Lobos man. It was really great. But we got too high and then me and my cousins decided to sneak out. Even though that doesn't make any fucking sense.

CNN once again mysteriously loses their feed when someone cites FBI statistics about how 30% of domestic terrorism is caused by refugees.

I really wish CNN would get better equipment.  They have this problem all the time.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rb_DKtUULZ8

aldousburbank

Quote from: K_Dubb on March 06, 2017, 06:03:25 PM
Edit:  Clapper was on NBC.

I thought Clapper was in the crapper with Tapper?

mikuthing01

Quote from: (((The King of Kings))) on March 06, 2017, 06:24:46 PM
CNN once again mysteriously loses their feed when someone cites FBI statistics about how 30% of domestic terrorism is caused by refugees.

I really wish CNN would get better equipment.  They have this problem all the time.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rb_DKtUULZ8

People still pay money to watch this shit LOL

TigerLily

Quote from: Kidnostad3 on March 06, 2017, 06:05:07 PM
Why are you not gainsaying my earlier post.  Have you forgotten.  Okay, I'll remind you.  It had to do with your bullshit post about declassification

https://en.m.wikisource.org/wiki/Executive_Order_13526

Executive Order 13526 ... selected sections by TL
Sec. 1.7. Classification Prohibitions and Limitations. 
(a)       In no case shall information be classified, continue to be maintained as classified, or fail to be declassified in order to:
(1)       conceal violations of law, inefficiency, or administrative error;
(2)       prevent embarrassment to a person, organization, or agency;
(3)       restrain competition; or
(4)       prevent or delay the release of information that does not require protection in the interest of the national security.

PART 3 â€" DECLASSIFICATION AND DOWNGRADING
Sec. 3.1. Authority for Declassification. 
(a)       Information shall be declassified as soon as it no longer meets the standards for classification under this order.
(b)       Information shall be declassified or downgraded by:
    
(1)       the official who authorized the original classification, if that official is still serving in the same position and has original classification authority;
(2)       the originator's current successor in function, if that individual has original classification authority;
(3)       a supervisory official of either the originator or his or her successor in function, if the supervisory official has original classification authority; or
(4)       officials delegated declassification authority in writing by the agency head or the senior agency official of the originating agency.
(c)       The Director of National Intelligence (or, if delegated by the Director of National Intelligence, the Principal Deputy Director of National Intelligence) may, with respect to the Intelligence Community, after consultation with the head of the originating Intelligence Community element or department, declassify, downgrade, or direct the declassification or downgrading of information or intelligence relating to intelligence sources, methods, or activities.

PART 6 â€" GENERAL PROVISIONS
(dd)       â€œNeed-to-know” means a determination within the executive branch in accordance with directives issued pursuant to this order that a prospective recipient requires access to specific classified information in order to perform or assist in a lawful and authorized governmental function.


Dr. MD MD

Quote from: (((The King of Kings))) on March 06, 2017, 05:43:11 PM


Trump is still Making America Great Again.

One less diseased ridden and degenerate idiot.

Dr. MD MD

Quote from: Pulling my Pud in Yorkshire on March 06, 2017, 06:10:07 PM
Careful.  You might get a phone call.

Really?! Is Dialing For Dollars still on?!  ???

Kidnostad3

Quote from: TigerLily on March 06, 2017, 06:47:09 PM
Executive Order 13526 ... selected sections by TL
Sec. 1.7. Classification Prohibitions and Limitations. 
(a)       In no case shall information be classified, continue to be maintained as classified, or fail to be declassified in order to:
    
(1)       conceal violations of law, inefficiency, or administrative error;
(2)       prevent embarrassment to a person, organization, or agency;
(3)       restrain competition; or
(4)       prevent or delay the release of information that does not require protection in the interest of the national security.

The key criteria is that it doesn't require classification.  Someone in the Obama Adinistration classified it and Obama did not declassify it.  What you are saying is that someone in the Obama administration committed a crime.  Why do you continue to embarrass yourself?

Dr. MD MD

Quote from: Kidnostad3 on March 06, 2017, 06:55:09 PM
The key criteria is that it no longer requires classification.  Someone in the Obama Adinistration classified it and Obama did not declassify it.  What you are saying is that someone in the Obama administration committed a crime.  Why do you continue to embarrass yourself?

She has no shame, clearly, if she'll make fun of a dead Navy SEAL and his grieving widow.  ;)

TigerLily

Quote from: Kidnostad3 on March 06, 2017, 06:55:09 PM
The key criteria is that it doesn't require classification.  Someone in the Obama Adinistration classified it and Obama did not declassify it.  What you are saying is that someone in the Obama administration committed a crime.  Why do you continue to embarrass yourself?

I was still modifying my post. I'm done now so go back and take another look. Now I need to go play in RL.  Laterz  :)

Kidnostad3

Quote from: TigerLily on March 06, 2017, 07:00:14 PM
I was still modifying my post. I'm done now so go back and take another look. Now I need to go play in RL.  Laterz  :)

I think this is what is called a text wall.  Nothing she added changes the validity of my last comment.
She really isn't very bright is she.  I wish a better class of Trump Hater would start posting.  The current batch are just plain dumb and they boar me. 


Dr. MD MD

Quote from: lucifer bell on March 06, 2017, 07:16:26 PM


Jack, I'm not so crazy about this John Wayne Gacy phase you're going through.  :-\

Quote from: TigerLily on March 05, 2017, 10:44:17 PM
Three courts on Friday struck down parts of controversial voter ID requirements put in place by Republicans, with one of those courts citing “clear discriminatory intent” by lawmakers in North Carolina to shrink the franchise for politically powerful US minorities.

The other huge win was in Texas, where the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, perhaps the most conservative federal appeals court in the country, balked at the Texas voter ID law,  ordering the lower court to make it easier for people to vote.

Similar rulings followed in Wisconsin, Ohio and South Dakota. And in Kansas, a state with a foreign-born population of 6.8 percent, courts have repeatedly rejected efforts by the Republican secretary of state to require voters to provide proof of citizenship to vote.

When they were first proposed, voter ID laws sounded reasonable to lots of people, including the Supreme Court. [But] have since suggested that the proof offered subsequently in other states shows these laws are aimed at suppressing the minority vote.

Can you help me understand how requiring proof of citizenship when registering to vote, and requiring voters to produce a photo ID when voting is discriminatory and suppresses the minority vote?

Since you've made multiple posts insisting this is the case, you must have  clear understanding of this.  Can you walk me through it and explain it, because it doesn't make any sense to me.

Posting links to news reports of court cases and quotes from people insisting it's so isn't going to help.  I've read plenty of that and still haven't heard any explanations other than them just saying it's so.

You've been accused of not being very bright (not by me), here's your chance to show otherwise.  Thanks in advance.

Kidnostad3

Quote from: TigerLily on March 06, 2017, 07:00:14 PM
I was still modifying my post. I'm done now so go back and take another look. Now I need to go play in RL.  Laterz  :)

This one's cheery disposition and seeming unperturbability makes me think she is a troll.  It's that or she is just is profoundly obtuse.

 

Quote from: Kidnostad3 on March 06, 2017, 07:22:48 PM
This one's cheery disposition and seeming unperturbability makes me think she is a troll.  It's that or she is just is profoundly obtuse.



Do you really need it spelled out for you? She's an agent of George Soros, and his third favorite concubine.

Dr. MD MD

Quote from: Kidnostad3 on March 06, 2017, 07:22:48 PM
This one's cheery disposition and seeming unperturbability makes me think she is a troll.  It's that or she is just is profoundly obtuse.



troll.

Kidnostad3

Quote from: TigerLily on March 06, 2017, 06:47:09 PM
https://en.m.wikisource.org/wiki/Executive_Order_13526

Executive Order 13526 ... selected sections by TL
Sec. 1.7. Classification Prohibitions and Limitations. 
(a)       In no case shall information be classified, continue to be maintained as classified, or fail to be declassified in order to:
(1)       conceal violations of law, inefficiency, or administrative error;
(2)       prevent embarrassment to a person, organization, or agency;
(3)       restrain competition; or
(4)       prevent or delay the release of information that does not require protection in the interest of the national security.

PART 3 â€" DECLASSIFICATION AND DOWNGRADING
Sec. 3.1. Authority for Declassification. 
(a)       Information shall be declassified as soon as it no longer meets the standards for classification under this order.
(b)       Information shall be declassified or downgraded by:
    
(1)       the official who authorized the original classification, if that official is still serving in the same position and has original classification authority;
(2)       the originator's current successor in function, if that individual has original classification authority;
(3)       a supervisory official of either the originator or his or her successor in function, if the supervisory official has original classification authority; or
(4)       officials delegated declassification authority in writing by the agency head or the senior agency official of the originating agency.
(c)       The Director of National Intelligence (or, if delegated by the Director of National Intelligence, the Principal Deputy Director of National Intelligence) may, with respect to the Intelligence Community, after consultation with the head of the originating Intelligence Community element or department, declassify, downgrade, or direct the declassification or downgrading of information or intelligence relating to intelligence sources, methods, or activities.

PART 6 â€" GENERAL PROVISIONS
(dd)       â€œNeed-to-know” means a determination within the executive branch in accordance with directives issued pursuant to this order that a prospective recipient requires access to specific classified information in order to perform or assist in a lawful and authorized governmental function.

I think this is what's called hiding behind a text wall.  Nothing she has added is relevant or changes the validity of my last statement.  She really isn't very bright is she.  I wish a better class of Trump Hater would start posting.  The current batch are just plain dumb and they boar me. I repeat:

"The key criteria is that it doesn't require classification.  Someone in the Obama Adinistration classified it and Obama did not declassify it.  What you are saying is that someone in the Obama administration committed a crime.  Why do you continue to embarrass yourself?"

WOTR

Quote from: Robert Ghostwolf's Ghost on March 06, 2017, 07:31:07 PM
Do you really need it spelled out for you? She's an agent of George Soros, and his third favorite concubine.
Second favourite.  Your should check out the new position she invented to garner the promotion.

Kidnostad3

Quote from: Robert Ghostwolf's Ghost on March 06, 2017, 07:31:07 PM
Do you really need it spelled out for you? She's an agent of George Soros, and his third favorite concubine.

Yeah but you are his third favorite concubine.  Oh, I get it.


Dr. MD MD

Quote from: Robert Ghostwolf's Ghost on March 06, 2017, 07:31:07 PM
Do you really need it spelled out for you? She's an agent of George Soros, and his third favorite concubine.

He should know! Soros and Brock use this guy like a set of Chinese finger-cuffs.  :o

Kidnostad3

Quote from: Dr. MD MD on March 06, 2017, 07:41:16 PM
He should know! Soros and Brock use this guy like a set of Chinese finger-cuffs.  :o

😂 😂 😂 That shit's funny! I don't care who you are.




Powered by SMFPacks Menu Editor Mod