• Welcome to BellGab/bellchan Archive.
 

President Donald J. Trump

Started by The General, February 10, 2011, 11:33:34 PM

Yorkshire pud

Quote from: Jackstar® on January 27, 2017, 07:53:48 AM

Being a diplomat is a job for faggots. It's not hard. You're an idiot to think otherwise.

So says a meth head!  ;D. "When it comes to recruitment, we always go to Jackstar!".  ;D

Jackstar

Quote from: Dr. MD MD on January 27, 2017, 08:05:45 AM
Me or her?

O Jesus. Okay, I admit it, maybe I was wrong. Maybe diplomacy is a job too difficult for a faggot to handle.

The term "special relationship" has been used at points throughout history to describe relations between nations that are, well, special. That the U.S. of A. is an empire comprised of its former colonies would seem to be a "unique" relationship, at the very least; however, for whatever reason, international diplomacy has chosen to use the phrase "special relationship" in a particular context.


You have undoubtedly seen me making reference to the required readings. That's not actually something I am joking about, Fucko.

Exsqueeze me--Doctor Fucko.


Quote from: Dr. MD MD on January 27, 2017, 08:03:47 AM
Your prime minister seems to think we have a "special" relationship. It's rather forthright of her, don't you think?  ???

SredniVashtar is British?

I thought he was Canadian as he had that hollow air of liberal self-righteous douchebaggery.

Taaroa

Quote from: Dr. MD MD on January 26, 2017, 10:36:18 AM
No...just no.  ;)

How else do you explain David Icke being known in America? If he had a kiwi accent no one would give him the time of day

Dr. MD MD

Quote from: Jackstar® on January 27, 2017, 08:09:21 AM
O Jesus. Okay, I admit it, maybe I was wrong. Maybe diplomacy is a job too difficult for a faggot to handle.

The term "special relationship" has been used at points throughout history to describe relations between nations that are, well, special. That the U.S. of A. is an empire comprised of its former colonies would seem to be a "unique" relationship, at the very least; however, for whatever reason, international diplomacy has chosen to use the phrase "special relationship" in a particular context.


You have undoubtedly seen me making reference to the required readings. That's not actually something I am joking about, Fucko.

Exsqueeze me--Doctor Fucko.

Reduce the dosage by about 25% and you should be alright.  ;)

Yorkshire pud

Quote from: (((The King of Kings))) on January 27, 2017, 08:07:30 AM
Interesting.

Donald Trump's position on securing the border and what is happening on our southern border comes directly from the border patrol, both field agents and commanders.

If we take your plea to listen to people with expertise,

Oh? I thought so called expertise was useless? Scientist experts are not qualified? Diplomatic experts not qualified? Border patrol experts not qualified!

SredniVashtar

Quote from: (((The King of Kings))) on January 27, 2017, 08:07:30 AM
Interesting.

Donald Trump's position on securing the border and what is happening on our southern border comes directly from the border patrol, both field agents and commanders.

If we take your plea to listen to people with expertise, then you must side with Donald Trump on the issue of border security and crime that stems from the horde of illegal immigration right? 

To not agree with the experiences of these border patrol and border security experts would undermine your own argument.

No, it's totally consistent with not going with anecdotal evidence. You can find people who say one thing, you can find people saying something else. If you can put some reliable data together then  you go with that rather than a few stories from some blokes in big hats.

Dr. MD MD

Quote from: Taaroa on January 27, 2017, 08:11:41 AM
How else do you explain David Icke being known in America? If he had a kiwi accent no one would give him the time of day

We love the citizens you reject (assuming your a Brit). They're more like Americans.  ;)

Dr. MD MD

Quote from: (((The King of Kings))) on January 27, 2017, 08:10:03 AM
SredniVashtar is British?

I thought he was Canadian as he had that hollow air of liberal self-righteous douchebaggery.

British, Canadian...it's all part of the Commonwealth.  ;)

Meister_000

Securing America
Trump refuses to use another smartphone other than the Galaxy S3. How you could hack and get access to his phone.

Jackstar

Quote from: SredniVashtar on January 27, 2017, 08:12:39 AM
If you can put some reliable data together then  you go with that


... no I don't!!!

Jackstar

Quote from: Meister_000 on January 27, 2017, 08:15:44 AM
Drumpf refuses to use another smartphone other than the Galaxy S3.


running custom ROM designed by Barron



9D CHESS


Quote from: PB the Deplorable on January 26, 2017, 10:54:09 PM

Take voter fraud.  We know people vote multiple times.  But how is that proved?  There is no national database of voters, no computers checking to see if any voted more than once. 

The ''studies'' are phony, just like the outlets that report them.  Everyone who is for fair elections wants this investigated, not just Trump.


I agree with you on this.

I have heard so many times that there was zero voter fraud this election.  Not only do they report there was zero voter fraud but they over emphasize it as though it is unheard of and could never happen.

Really?

America has a history of voter fraud going back decades and centuries.  Numerous books have been written on the subject and numerous documentaries have been created well before the past election.

Hell, in the Gore Vs. Bush election there was election fraud.

I find it hard to believe in a nation of 300 million+ people and 100 million+ voting, that not one occurence of fraud was committed.

If you think there was not a single instance of voter fraud, you would have to be a fucking idiot.  The rest of us who believe there was probably more or less are arguing if there was enough voter fraud to warrant an investigation.

The thing that strikes me as odd, is there could have been wide spread fraud committed by Trump supporters in some of these close states.

In closing, it is hard to determine if fraud has been committed without an independent investigation, so it is rather dubious the MSM is so forceful in saying there wasn't any voter fraud at all.


SredniVashtar

Quote from: (((The King of Kings))) on January 27, 2017, 08:37:00 AM

I agree with you on this.

I have heard so many times that there was zero voter fraud this election.  Not only do they report there was zero voter fraud but they over emphasize it as though it is unheard of and could never happen.

Really?

The onus is on the one making the claim to back it up with evidence. Just saying 'oh well all know there's tons of fraud' doesn't cut the mustard. If you have verifiable proof then you are taken seriously. If you don't then people conclude that you're talking off the top of your head. This has all sprung from Trump's fevered imagination, because it gnaws at him that he lost the popular vote. Just as he hates the fact that his inauguration was relatively poorly attended.

Meister_000

Trump/Pence: Making Fetuses Safe Again

Dr. MD MD

Quote from: SredniVashtar on January 27, 2017, 08:42:51 AM
The onus is on the one making the claim to back it up with evidence. Just saying 'oh well all know there's tons of fraud' doesn't cut the mustard.

That's why the need for the investigation.  ;)

Jackstar

Quote from: SredniVashtar on January 27, 2017, 08:42:51 AM
The onus is on the one making the claim to back it up with evidence. [...] This has all sprung from Drumpf's fevered imagination


Present your evidence.

SredniVashtar

Quote from: Dr. MD MD on January 27, 2017, 08:48:27 AM
That's why the need for the investigation.  ;)

You need good evidence that there's some need for an investigation first. Not simply because DT doesn't like being a loser.

Dr. MD MD

Quote from: SredniVashtar on January 27, 2017, 08:50:15 AM
You need good evidence that there's some need for an investigation first. Not simply because DT doesn't like being a loser.

Finding evidence without performing an investigation is an impossibility...but you knew that!  :D

Yorkshire pud

Quote from: Dr. MD MD on January 27, 2017, 08:48:27 AM
That's why the need for the investigation.  ;)

Oh? Trump said he had the facts, so why doesn't he present them?

Dr. MD MD

Quote from: Justin has two cars now on January 27, 2017, 08:51:26 AM
Oh? Trump said he had the facts, so why doesn't he present them?

See my last post, learn some logic and then die in a fire.  :P

Jackstar

Quote from: Justin has two cars now on January 27, 2017, 08:51:26 AM
so why doesn't he present them?


Is this really the place to educate yourself on how jurisprudence in the U.S. works? Read a book. Ask the Irish. Whatever.

Quote from: Justin has two cars now on January 27, 2017, 08:12:16 AM
Oh? I thought so called expertise was useless? Scientist experts are not qualified? Diplomatic experts not qualified? Border patrol experts not qualified!

You seem to be having a conversation with five different people and believing we all have the exact same thoughts even though we haven't voiced our opinions on any number of topics.

Let me be clear.

I only need Trump to do three things.  Deport the 11 miilion illegal aliens back to their countries of origin, build a wall on the southern border and stop the influx of arab and muslim refugees and immigrants.

I don't agree with him restarting the Dakota Pipeline, I don't agree with him on his Pro-Israel philosophy, nor do I agree with him on his notion of climate change being a chinese hoax.  On the last one however it is hard to take climate change seriously when our last US President had special Chicago hotdogs flown in for him when airplanes, or"aero"planes are the biggest sources of harmful pollutants.


Jackstar

Quote from: (((The King of Kings))) on January 27, 2017, 08:54:40 AM
when airplanes, or"aero"planes are the biggest sources of harmful pollutants.

Dude, it's nanotech. Read a book. Ask the Irish. Whatever.

Yorkshire pud

Quote from: Dr. MD MD on January 27, 2017, 08:52:42 AM
See my last post, learn some logic and then die in a fire.  :P

I know you're on an intellectual level with bacteria not yet discovered (and Trump), but if he's going to make wild claims as 'evidence' before an investigation, he really ought to have his case wrapped up. But as you wank over a photo of him each morning, you won't know that. Its okay.

Jackstar

Quote from: Justin has two cars now on January 27, 2017, 08:57:17 AM
he really ought to have his case wrapped up

It's our case. You wouldn't understand that, subject.

Dr. MD MD

Quote from: Justin has two cars now on January 27, 2017, 08:57:17 AM
I know you're on an intellectual level with bacteria not yet discovered (and Trump), but if he's going to make wild claims as 'evidence' before an investigation, he really ought to have his case wrapped up. But as you wank over a photo of him each morning, you won't know that. Its okay.

So, he should've done a proper investigation before the proper investigation before you'd take him seriously?! Oh, that is some rich doublespeak from the British empire.  ;D

Jackstar

Quote from: Dr. MD MD on January 27, 2017, 08:58:57 AM
some rich doublespeak from the British empire


Q: Why did the sun never set on the British Empire?

A: You can't trust an Englishman in the dark.

Powered by SMFPacks Menu Editor Mod