• Welcome to BellGab/bellchan Archive.
 

Hey Brian Williams, "I got your back bro", Sincerely Dan Rather

Started by Gd5150, February 05, 2015, 01:25:30 PM

NowhereInTime

Quote from: Paper*Boy on February 06, 2015, 05:45:32 PM
Don't you have a protest demanding the murder of more police to attend?  Be sure to insist it's 'peaceful'


Don't you have to peer out your blinds and yell at some black teenagers "I've already called the police!"?

136 or 142

Quote from: Paper*Boy on February 06, 2015, 05:45:32 PM

Don't you have a protest demanding the murder of more police to attend?  Be sure to insist it's 'peaceful'


You mean the protests attended by G. Gordon Liddy, Wayne Anthony Ross, Charleton Heston and Cliven Bundy and his supporters?

albrecht

Quote from: 136 or 142 on February 06, 2015, 08:31:40 PM

Clinton lied about sex and Dumbya lied about war, but to conservatives what Clinton did was worse.  Sex is worse than dead people I guess.


I believe Clinton actually bombed Iraq a number of times.


That said, he never invaded Iraq.  An important distinction that seems to be unable to penetrate conservatives' thick heads.
Clinton did bomb Iraq, not just to take away from his presistent sex scandals. Interestingly some accounts say more ordinance dropped under him than Bush's early days.
http://www.rawstory.com/news/2005/Clinton_bombing_of_Iraq_far_exceeded_Bushs_in_runup_to_war__Bush_spikes_of_activity_que_0705.html
He liked bombing, sometimes to take attention away from his scandals, like sending cruise missile to hit the pharmaceutical factory in Sudan and sometimes bombing to help support the radical Islamists in the Balkans (going so far to even bomb the Chinese Embassy in Belgrade.)
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/chatterbox/2004/03/khartoum_revisited_part_2.html
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/338424.stm

Oddly, to the leftists, it is ok to bomb with lots of collateral damage and damage to civilian infrastructure under Clinton but under Bush targeted drone strikes or bombings were bad, But under Obama it is good again to bomb and drone away regardless of civilian collateral damage or deaths! :o

albrecht

Quote from: NowhereInTime on February 07, 2015, 07:21:51 AM

Don't you have to peer out your blinds and yell at some black teenagers "I've already called the police!"?
Like the signs in my neighborhood say "we report all suspicious activity" and if there was a bunch of "youths"- to use the euphemism certainly popular in the press when reporting all the crime since race is verboten to mention directly- was milling-about in my neighborhood it would be considered suspicious.

NowhereInTime

Quote from: albrecht on February 07, 2015, 07:32:25 AM
Like the signs in my neighborhood say "we report all suspicious activity" and if there was a bunch of "youths"- to use the euphemism certainly popular in the press when reporting all the crime since race is verboten to mention directly- was milling-about in my neighborhood it would be considered suspicious.


Please, the signs in your neighborhood have cheery little slogans like, "Arbeit Macht Frei!" and "Juden Ist Verboten!"


VtaGeezer

Quote from: albrecht on February 07, 2015, 07:29:40 AM
Oddly, to the leftists, it is ok to bomb with lots of collateral damage and damage to civilian infrastructure under Clinton but under Bush targeted drone strikes or bombings were bad, But under Obama it is good again to bomb and drone away regardless of civilian collateral damage or deaths! :o
Collateral casualties are an unavoidable part of modern warfare.  Bombing and drone strikes have far less risk to US personnel and no President would be able to respond to localized threat if it meant sending in ground forces and the inevitable flag-draped caskets.  At least Obama can use a 20 lb HE warhead on a Hellfire fired from a UAV instead of 500 lb JDAMs from F-18s; as Clinton was limited to using. And we have weapons coming on line with small warheads designed specifically for the kind of warfare we now have; to take out an SUV carrying a couple jihadis without shredding the buildings around it.

Of course, if Obama wasn't using armed drones, you be ranting about the red-diaper Kenyan/Indonesian/Mohammedan pussy from the Chicago Machine letting mooslum terrorists go free.

VtaGeezer

I don't watch Jimmy Fallon and don't know if he has a straight man, but maybe Williams can be Fallon's "Ed McMahon".

popple

Looks like Brian will step away from his chair... for a few days?  ???

Gd5150

Quote from: VtaGeezer on February 07, 2015, 10:16:52 AM
Kenyan/Indonesian/Mohammedan pussy from the Chicago Machine letting mooslum terrorists go free.
How dare people lie about Obama and say he's Indonesian. Sadly the rest is all true.

albrecht

Quote from: Gd5150 on February 07, 2015, 03:28:23 PM
How dare people lie about Obama and say he's Indonesian. Sadly the rest is all true.
Indonesian only by adoption (though he refuses to release the records on that so we really don't know the circumstances of his adoption and only have his autobiographies for this information) when he went by the surname "Soetoro." Alas, he also refuses to release the information of when he legally changed his name BACK from Soetoro to Obama so we don't really know when he started being a Soetoro and became again an Obama. But, like so much of his mysterious, and frankly bizarre (cross-dressing nanny in a Muslim country!) history and background, this will likely be something for historians to delve through decades from now when some archives are opened or people decided on death-bed confessions....

VtaGeezer

Quote from: albrecht on February 07, 2015, 03:47:47 PM
Indonesian only by adoption (though he refuses to release the records on that so we really don't know the circumstances of his adoption and only have his autobiographies for this information) when he went by the surname "Soetoro." Alas, he also refuses to release the information of when he legally changed his name BACK from Soetoro to Obama so we don't really know when he started being a Soetoro and became again an Obama. But, like so much of his mysterious, and frankly bizarre (cross-dressing nanny in a Muslim country!) history and background, this will likely be something for historians to delve through decades from now when some archives are opened or people decided on death-bed confessions....
I figure that Obama's conspiring to conquer America for Islam and Kenya by leaving a diabolic bait trail of irrelevant trivia about his childhood that's successfully causing the right to lose their minds.

Pale Horse

Dr. Paul Craig Roberts tells it like it is... This white lie is really a distraction covering up a much greater pattern of lies, by a cabal of lying liars with their pants on fire... Called the MEDIA.  Read this short article outing the Presstitute Media.


http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article40906.htm



NowhereInTime

Quote from: Pale Horse on February 07, 2015, 04:18:28 PM
Dr. Paul Craig Roberts tells it like it is... This white lie is really a distraction covering up a much greater pattern of lies, by a cabal of lying liars with their pants on fire... Called the MEDIA.  Read this short article outing the Presstitute Media.


http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article40906.htm
I tried, but like all conservatives, he just goes on and on and on.  Get to the damn point. And when he finally does, its' all about how the media just lies for "Barak" Obama. 
What a crap load.


God, conservatives cannot write or speak without so much prelude, prefacing, and sanctimony. Pathetic whiny bitches.

136 or 142

Quote from: albrecht on February 07, 2015, 03:47:47 PM
Indonesian only by adoption (though he refuses to release the records on that so we really don't know the circumstances of his adoption and only have his autobiographies for this information) when he went by the surname "Soetoro." Alas, he also refuses to release the information of when he legally changed his name BACK from Soetoro to Obama so we don't really know when he started being a Soetoro and became again an Obama. But, like so much of his mysterious, and frankly bizarre (cross-dressing nanny in a Muslim country!) history and background, this will likely be something for historians to delve through decades from now when some archives are opened or people decided on death-bed confessions....


I have to mirror VtaGeezer here, wtf do any of these things matter?

Did Gerald Ford ever release the details of why he changed his name from Leslie Lynch King?  and how many Americans today even know that Ford's original name was Leslie Lynch King?

136 or 142

Quote from: NowhereInTime on February 07, 2015, 04:22:59 PM
I tried, but like all conservatives, he just goes on and on and on.  Get to the damn point. And when he finally does, its' all about how the media just lies for "Barak" Obama. 
What a crap load.


God, conservatives cannot write or speak without so much prelude, prefacing, and sanctimony. Pathetic whiny bitches.


The only small-c conservative I recommend reading is Canadian columnist Andrew Coyne.  Sanctimonious yes, but also smart, informed and intellectually honest. I'm not familiar with any European conservative writers, so there may be more decent conservative writers out there. 

VtaGeezer

Quote from: 136 or 142 on February 07, 2015, 04:25:17 PM

I have to mirror VtaGeezer here, wtf do any of these things matter?

Did Gerald Ford ever release the details of why he changed his name from Leslie Lynch King?  and how many Americans today even know that Ford's original name was Leslie Lynch King?
I can imagine the reaction of rightwingers if Obama had kept "Barry Soetoro" and they learned his birth name was Barack Hussein Obama.  O'Reilly's head would have exploded.

136 or 142

Quote from: Pale Horse on February 07, 2015, 04:18:28 PM
Dr. Paul Craig Roberts tells it like it is... This white lie is really a distraction covering up a much greater pattern of lies, by a cabal of lying liars with their pants on fire... Called the MEDIA.  Read this short article outing the Presstitute Media.


http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article40906.htm


Is this supposed to impress me?


"Think about this for a minute. We have been hearing from high US government officials, including the president himself, for months and months about Russian tank columns and troops entering Ukraine. The Russian government denies this steadfastly, but, of course, we cannot trust the now-demonized Russians. We are not allowed to believe them, because they are positioned as the Enemy, and good patriotic Americans never believe the Enemy.But how can we help but believe the Russians? If all these Russian tank columns and troops that have allegedly been pouring into Ukraine were real, Washington’s puppet government in Kiev would have fallen sometime last year, and the conflict would be over. Anyone with a brain knows this."

1.Anyone with a brain would also know that the success of the Russian troops would depend on the number of them being sent in.


2.Anyone with knowledge of history would also know that the supposedly superior Russian forces were also defeated in Afghanistan and that while, as the article states, the Russians did rout the Georgian Army, the Ukrainian military is much larger.  The Russian troops also didn't do all that well in South Ossetia.  It took months for them to defeat  the rebels.

3,Finally anyway who knows what's going on in Eastern Ukraine would know that what he claimed would occur is largely what has occurred.  The rebels were being wiped out by the Ukrainian army, the Russian troops came in and now the Ukrainian has would largely been routed.  If Russian troops haven't been sent in, then why have Russian parents told stories of the soldier sons 'disappearing' and why are their troops in Eastern Ukraine without uniforms signifying what country they come from when asked state they 'come from Russia'

The only lying 'presstitute' is the author of that dimwitted article.


Juan

Quote from: 136 or 142 on February 07, 2015, 04:25:17 PM

I have to mirror VtaGeezer here, wtf do any of these things matter?

Did Gerald Ford ever release the details of why he changed his name from Leslie Lynch King?  and how many Americans today even know that Ford's original name was Leslie Lynch King?
Why, yes he did.  It's even on your favorite -Wikipedia. Silly.

NowhereInTime

Quote from: Juan on February 07, 2015, 04:42:28 PM
Why, yes he did.  It's even on your favorite -Wikipedia. Silly.
I'm not going to lie; as soon as I read that I Googled it and read the Wikipedia article.  Never knew that before.

albrecht

Quote from: 136 or 142 on February 07, 2015, 04:25:17 PM

I have to mirror VtaGeezer here, wtf do any of these things matter?

Did Gerald Ford ever release the details of why he changed his name from Leslie Lynch King?  and how many Americans today even know that Ford's original name was Leslie Lynch King?
The mysterious background should be above-board and documents released. If he was legally adopted by Soetoro and had his name changed (and a passport issued under the new name) than the documents should be provided and explained. Did he have an Indonesian passport? Ok, that happens- and he was a child but when did he renounced that citizenship, presumably he would have if he was legally adopted by Soetoro or if a passport under the new moniker was issued? Usually upon an age-of-majority in these cases of mixed parentage and dual citizenship or passports you get "to pick" which nationality you want to assume. Or go with both (though our government doesn't really "sanction" dual-citizenship the Courts, and government policy, admit it exists and is respected (in most cases.) He claims he was Soetoro in Indonesia so when did he "go back" to the legal Obama name and did he give up his passport, and citizenship there? Or never had it? Or what? Very odd and vague. Ignoring the SS number issue (which itself is very odd and the SS administration has announced they no longer will issue numbers based on state of application now.)

Interestingly I doubt Obama would pass a "Yankee White" -due to his mysterious background and odd, some militant, associations, friends, and mentors- but, since he is not working FOR the President, but elected the President 2X, likely he wasn't vetted by that process.

Pale Horse

Here's is the name of the article. It is completely non-partisan and is only one page long...

"The Cowardly and Despicable American Presstitutes" By Paul Craig Roberts ...
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article40906.htm

And Yes, I posted it to gain esteem and recognition. Was definitely trying to impress, assholes like you. Easier to spot the trolls than I thought. Stick to the issues, jerk.


His basic point is: Who Effen Cares if Brian Williams lied about something so trivial when they lie to us nightly about serious and more important issues. Duh.






albrecht

Quote from: Pale Horse on February 07, 2015, 04:56:39 PM
Here's is the name of the article. It is completely non-partisan and is only one page long...

"The Cowardly and Despicable American Presstitutes" By Paul Craig Roberts ...
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article40906.htm

And Yes, I posted it to gain esteem and recognition. Was definitely trying to impress, assholes like you. Easier to spot the trolls than I thought. Stick to the issues, jerk.


His basic point is: Who Effen Cares if Brian Williams lied about something so trivial when they lie to us nightly about serious and more important issues. Duh.
I heard a bit of that on NPR last week. Turned it off when the "expert" started on about memory being elastic. (Plus I got out of my car at that time.) Sure memory is elastic and can be changed. There is a difference telling stories about the big fish you caught or how beautiful some gal was to your buddies over some beers. Sure reminiscing about old times or childhood can cause less-than-total-truth being recalled. But claiming outright being shot at in a war-zone to a national audience? That is called a LIE- not an embellishment, a "misremembered" event, an old man in dementia, etc. Especially when it was retold several times and expands itself. And you base your gravitas (like that old popular word from the press several years ago?) on such stories. Fire that fraud.

Pale Horse

That's what I'm saying. All this airtime wasted debating how much of a liar Brian Williams is for telling his fib. What really happened? Did he misspeak? Misremember? Choke on his propaganda?


They LIE FOR A LIVING!


Any tenth-grader with a half a brain could ask better questions and get better answers than our Presstitute Media does for us on a nightly basis.  And they are all the same CNN, FOX, NBC.. they serve the same miliaristic agenda.


http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article40906.htm


We have no democracy without a stand-up press, not Presstitutes.

albrecht

Quote from: Pale Horse on February 07, 2015, 05:17:29 PM
That's what I'm saying. All this airtime wasted debating how much of a liar Brian Williams is for telling his fib. What really happened? Did he misspeak? Misremember? Choke on his propaganda?


They LIE FOR A LIVING!


Any tenth-grader with a half a brain could ask better questions and get better answers than our Presstitute Media does for us on a nightly basis.  And they are all the same CNN, FOX, NBC.. they serve the same miliaristic agenda.


http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article40906.htm


We have no democracy without a stand-up press, not Presstitutes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lMQHVzSPTec
Be Happy!

136 or 142

Quote from: Pale Horse on February 07, 2015, 04:56:39 PM
Here's is the name of the article. It is completely non-partisan and is only one page long...

"The Cowardly and Despicable American Presstitutes" By Paul Craig Roberts ...
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article40906.htm

And Yes, I posted it to gain esteem and recognition. Was definitely trying to impress, assholes like you. Easier to spot the trolls than I thought. Stick to the issues, jerk.


His basic point is: Who Effen Cares if Brian Williams lied about something so trivial when they lie to us nightly about serious and more important issues. Duh.


His point would have had more effect if he wasn't the one lying in the article.

136 or 142

Quote from: albrecht on February 07, 2015, 04:50:11 PM
The mysterious background should be above-board and documents released. If he was legally adopted by Soetoro and had his name changed (and a passport issued under the new name) than the documents should be provided and explained. Did he have an Indonesian passport? Ok, that happens- and he was a child but when did he renounced that citizenship, presumably he would have if he was legally adopted by Soetoro or if a passport under the new moniker was issued? Usually upon an age-of-majority in these cases of mixed parentage and dual citizenship or passports you get "to pick" which nationality you want to assume. Or go with both (though our government doesn't really "sanction" dual-citizenship the Courts, and government policy, admit it exists and is respected (in most cases.) He claims he was Soetoro in Indonesia so when did he "go back" to the legal Obama name and did he give up his passport, and citizenship there? Or never had it? Or what? Very odd and vague. Ignoring the SS number issue (which itself is very odd and the SS administration has announced they no longer will issue numbers based on state of application now.)

Interestingly I doubt Obama would pass a "Yankee White" -due to his mysterious background and odd, some militant, associations, friends, and mentors- but, since he is not working FOR the President, but elected the President 2X, likely he wasn't vetted by that process.


Enquiring minds want to know!


Pale Horse

Quote from: 136 or 142 on February 07, 2015, 05:30:01 PM

His point would have had more effect if he wasn't the one lying in the article.




So you honestly believe that Russia has invaded Ukraine? And It's our job to stop them? Where is the evidence of a Russian invasion of Ukraine? You are full of shit, just like the American Presstitutes spouting their nightly lies and propaganda. Inciting us to war, just like the War Profiteers at GE and Westinghouse really want... Endless War for Endless Profits. ...


Didn't  you read Major General Smedley Butler's, "War is a Racket?" 
What about John Perkins, "Confessions of an Economic Hitman."


You honestly believe the crap they sell us as the truth. Their Endless wars for endless profits. Geez, you're naive.

Pale Horse

Ask yourself why a journalist’s false memory episode of an insignificant event is so important to the American presstitutes, while John Kerry’s and Barak Obama’s extraordinary, blatant, blockbuster, and dangerous lies are ignored.[/size]

[/size]
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article40906.htm

Powered by SMFPacks Menu Editor Mod