Midnight In The Desert

[Auslandia]

Wtf was the point of interviewing Seth Shostak again?

[akwilly]

Wtf was the point of interviewing Seth Shostak again?

to prove that he might be gay and he doesn't believe in aliens

[AZZERAE]

Interesting topic and guest so far tonight. Heather is getting better by the day.

No, she's not.

[SredniVashtar]

I'll be honest I haven't looked too deep into either the Sandy Hook stuff or the Boston bombing stuff but I'm open to learning about it.

I read something a few weeks ago called (I think) "What Really Happened at Sandy Hook?" and it contains all the most demented aspects of the conspiracy movement in one handy volume. For a start they claim that the school had been abandoned many years before and it was something staged to bring in gun control. OK, if the school was abandoned, you only have to visit the area and enquire around about people who attended the school during those years and that's the mystery solved.  But they don't do that, instead preferring to focus on trivial little details about a door that needed painting as 'proof' that is was all a fake.

The claim that the laughing father was 'proof' that it was all a set-up makes no sense at all. If they were using an actor, why couldn't they get a good actor? Wouldn't it make more sense that you had a man who woke up that morning living his life as usual, and a few hours later finds it shattered and is having a public emotional breakdown? It looked like someone on the verge of hysteria and it's offensive to suggest that they ought to act in a certain way or it's all a put-up job. The same goes for the coroner, who was criticised for acting oddly, when he must have been under tremendous stress after seeing lots of children killed by high-powered weapons. Yet you get all these armchair theorists who think that life happens by the book all the time.

All of these conspiracy theories work backwards. They start with the belief that it must be untrue and then look for any way they can to find some validation for it. One of the most ridiculous claims about Sandy Hook is that a lot of the children who were killed turned up later on in a children's choir at the Superbowl. There was also the claim that there were two pictures taken of children being led away from the school, and one was taken months later. For a start, why would you take a picture months later? But, more importantly, they claim that the second picture was released to give a better view of the staged scene, when what had obviously happened (to anybody with any sense) was that one of the child had made a run for it and a teacher had rushed forward to grab him.

I don't know anything about the Boston bombing, but the idea that Sandy Hook was anything other than what it was said to be is flat out insane.

[akwilly]

I read something a few weeks ago called (I think) "What Really Happened at Sandy Hook?" and it contains all the most demented aspects of the conspiracy movement in one handy volume. For a start they claim that the school had been abandoned many years before and it was something staged to bring in gun control. OK, if the school was abandoned, you only have to visit the area and enquire around about people who attended the school during those years and that's the mystery solved.  But they don't do that, instead preferring to focus on trivial little details about a door that needed painting as 'proof' that is was all a fake.

The claim that the laughing father was 'proof' that it was all a set-up makes no sense at all. If they were using an actor, why couldn't they get a good actor? Wouldn't it make more sense that you had a man who woke up that morning living his life as usual, and a few hours later finds it shattered and is having a public emotional breakdown? It looked like someone on the verge of hysteria and it's offensive to suggest that they ought to act in a certain way or it's all a put-up job. The same goes for the coroner, who was criticised for acting oddly, when he must have been under tremendous stress after seeing lots of children killed by high-powered weapons. Yet you get all these armchair theorists who think that life happens by the book all the time.

All of these conspiracy theories work backwards. They start with the belief that it must be untrue and then look for any way they can to find some validation for it. One of the most ridiculous claims about Sandy Hook is that a lot of the children who were killed turned up later on in a children's choir at the Superbowl. There was also the claim that there were two pictures taken of children being led away from the school, and one was taken months later. For a start, why would you take a picture months later? But, more importantly, they claim that the second picture was released to give a better view of the staged scene, when what had obviously happened (to anybody with any sense) was that one of the child had made a run for it and a teacher had rushed forward to grab him.

I don't know anything about the Boston bombing, but the idea that Sandy Hook was anything other than what it was said to be is flat out insane.

+1 well said

[Auslandia]

I don't know anything about the Boston bombing, but the idea that Sandy Hook was anything other than what it was said to be is flat out insane.

Exactly.  It's a waste of time and a major insult to everyone's intelligence and most importantly an insult to the families.

[Dyna-X]

No, she's not.

Ahhhhh. Sigh....D'Di'Didn't you looove last night's show? All the conspiracy....Wow! I could not Sleeep after That! I mean if we keep on having all these shows, how are we going to sleep? And that's something we allll need.  Else, we might all turn into......Zombies! Tonight's open lines I will open a special Zombie line for all... of... You! I want to hear alllll about your experinces with...Zombies.  Because the world had gone crazy...hasn't it? Also a special line for all of you to do your best impressions of channeling..Me!

[akwilly]

Ahhhhh. Sigh....D'Di'Didn't you looove last night's show? All the conspiracy....Wow! I could not Sleeep after That! I mean if we keep on having all these shows, how are we going to sleep? And that's something we allll need.  Else, we might all turn into......Zombies! Tonight's open lines I will open a special Zombie line for all... of... You! I want to hear alllll about your experinces with...Zombies.  Because the world had gone crazy...hasn't it?

your post, read in usernames voice "EODR" would awesome

[Dyna-X]

your post, read in usernames voice "EODR" would awesome

LOL, and with extra reverb.

[SredniVashtar]

As for topics, I've suggested the ghost dance movement of the late 19th century, English chalk Giants,

Yes, I second that one. Check out this bad boy.

[akwilly]

Yes, I second that one. Check out this bad boy.

wow, Banski is out of control

[Étouffée]

wow, Banski is out of control

Wow!  If that can be authenticated as an original Banksy piece, it'd be worth a fortune!

[Yorkshire pud]

I read something a few weeks ago called (I think) "What Really Happened at Sandy Hook?" and it contains all the most demented aspects of the conspiracy movement in one handy volume. For a start they claim that the school had been abandoned many years before and it was something staged to bring in gun control. OK, if the school was abandoned, you only have to visit the area and enquire around about people who attended the school during those years and that's the mystery solved.  But they don't do that, instead preferring to focus on trivial little details about a door that needed painting as 'proof' that is was all a fake.

The claim that the laughing father was 'proof' that it was all a set-up makes no sense at all. If they were using an actor, why couldn't they get a good actor? Wouldn't it make more sense that you had a man who woke up that morning living his life as usual, and a few hours later finds it shattered and is having a public emotional breakdown? It looked like someone on the verge of hysteria and it's offensive to suggest that they ought to act in a certain way or it's all a put-up job. The same goes for the coroner, who was criticised for acting oddly, when he must have been under tremendous stress after seeing lots of children killed by high-powered weapons. Yet you get all these armchair theorists who think that life happens by the book all the time.

All of these conspiracy theories work backwards. They start with the belief that it must be untrue and then look for any way they can to find some validation for it. One of the most ridiculous claims about Sandy Hook is that a lot of the children who were killed turned up later on in a children's choir at the Superbowl. There was also the claim that there were two pictures taken of children being led away from the school, and one was taken months later. For a start, why would you take a picture months later? But, more importantly, they claim that the second picture was released to give a better view of the staged scene, when what had obviously happened (to anybody with any sense) was that one of the child had made a run for it and a teacher had rushed forward to grab him.

I don't know anything about the Boston bombing, but the idea that Sandy Hook was anything other than what it was said to be is flat out insane.

My dear boy; the maxim is that you cannot educate pork. These vile little oiks are sub normal on several levels; they cite 'research' as simply reposting shit that has been posted elsewhere. A good thrashing would be far too good for them.

[Little Hater]

My dear boy; the maxim is that you cannot educate pork. These vile little oiks are sub normal on several levels; they cite 'research' as simply reposting shit that has been posted elsewhere. A good thrashing would be far too good for them.

A little irony in the fact that these 'truther' nitwits should be happy that almost no one shares their delusions. I've thought that if those who want stricter gun control measures can't get them enacted after twenty first-graders are murdered, they never will. Seems like Sandy Hook has proven that these assclowns no longer have to worry about tragic events, false-flag or otherwise, bringing about more gun control.

[ziznak]

I read something a few weeks ago called (I think) "What Really Happened at Sandy Hook?" and it contains all the most demented aspects of the conspiracy movement in one handy volume. For a start they claim that the school had been abandoned many years before and it was something staged to bring in gun control. OK, if the school was abandoned, you only have to visit the area and enquire around about people who attended the school during those years and that's the mystery solved.  But they don't do that, instead preferring to focus on trivial little details about a door that needed painting as 'proof' that is was all a fake.

The claim that the laughing father was 'proof' that it was all a set-up makes no sense at all. If they were using an actor, why couldn't they get a good actor? Wouldn't it make more sense that you had a man who woke up that morning living his life as usual, and a few hours later finds it shattered and is having a public emotional breakdown? It looked like someone on the verge of hysteria and it's offensive to suggest that they ought to act in a certain way or it's all a put-up job. The same goes for the coroner, who was criticised for acting oddly, when he must have been under tremendous stress after seeing lots of children killed by high-powered weapons. Yet you get all these armchair theorists who think that life happens by the book all the time.

All of these conspiracy theories work backwards. They start with the belief that it must be untrue and then look for any way they can to find some validation for it. One of the most ridiculous claims about Sandy Hook is that a lot of the children who were killed turned up later on in a children's choir at the Superbowl. There was also the claim that there were two pictures taken of children being led away from the school, and one was taken months later. For a start, why would you take a picture months later? But, more importantly, they claim that the second picture was released to give a better view of the staged scene, when what had obviously happened (to anybody with any sense) was that one of the child had made a run for it and a teacher had rushed forward to grab him.

I don't know anything about the Boston bombing, but the idea that Sandy Hook was anything other than what it was said to be is flat out insane.

Yeah I have to give you kudos on this post Shredder.  Just recently I was googling something in google images and came upon a whole shit-ton of "sandy-hoax" pictures.  They were labelled with little drawings.  One showed that a child's arm was at a 90 degree angle??? which meant something i dunno... I didn't GET any of them they made no sense.  Just like a lot of these false flaggers... its crazyness.  awesome post sir!

edit: heres one of the pics

can anybody splain this?

[VtaGeezer]

My dear boy; the maxim is that you cannot educate pork. These vile little oiks are sub normal on several levels; they cite 'research' as simply reposting shit that has been posted elsewhere. A good thrashing would be far too good for them.

So true.  And the internet allows these once shut-in freaks to find each other and feed their collective insanity.

[Dr. MD MD]

I read something a few weeks ago called (I think) "What Really Happened at Sandy Hook?" and it contains all the most demented aspects of the conspiracy movement in one handy volume. For a start they claim that the school had been abandoned many years before and it was something staged to bring in gun control. OK, if the school was abandoned, you only have to visit the area and enquire around about people who attended the school during those years and that's the mystery solved.  But they don't do that, instead preferring to focus on trivial little details about a door that needed painting as 'proof' that is was all a fake.

The claim that the laughing father was 'proof' that it was all a set-up makes no sense at all. If they were using an actor, why couldn't they get a good actor? Wouldn't it make more sense that you had a man who woke up that morning living his life as usual, and a few hours later finds it shattered and is having a public emotional breakdown? It looked like someone on the verge of hysteria and it's offensive to suggest that they ought to act in a certain way or it's all a put-up job. The same goes for the coroner, who was criticised for acting oddly, when he must have been under tremendous stress after seeing lots of children killed by high-powered weapons. Yet you get all these armchair theorists who think that life happens by the book all the time.

All of these conspiracy theories work backwards. They start with the belief that it must be untrue and then look for any way they can to find some validation for it. One of the most ridiculous claims about Sandy Hook is that a lot of the children who were killed turned up later on in a children's choir at the Superbowl. There was also the claim that there were two pictures taken of children being led away from the school, and one was taken months later. For a start, why would you take a picture months later? But, more importantly, they claim that the second picture was released to give a better view of the staged scene, when what had obviously happened (to anybody with any sense) was that one of the child had made a run for it and a teacher had rushed forward to grab him.

I don't know anything about the Boston bombing, but the idea that Sandy Hook was anything other than what it was said to be is flat out insane.

While I may not agree with everything you're saying here I at least appreciate your attempt to address some of it specifically rather than just dismissing it as "insane" which you also did, of course. Almost no one else would. I just think it does a disservice to your arguement if you try to simply dismiss another viewpoint as insane without saying why. There have been "armchair" theorists in history for whom time has proven them right too. Most simply find the subject of mass murder too distasteful to investigate and would rather just accept what they're told as fact. That way there's certainty instead of an open wound of uncertainty and they can lay it to rest and get on with their lives. However, this kind of expediency is rarely ever in service of the truth and using ridicule to cut off debate at the knees isn't really doing anyone any good though.

[Dr. MD MD]

So true.  And the internet allows these once shut-in freaks to find each other and feed their collective insanity.

Shhh...it's feeding 

[Dr. MD MD]

Exactly.  It's a waste of time and a major insult to everyone's intelligence and most importantly an insult to the families.

Though I couldn't say for sure I highly doubt any of the families are Bellgabbers 

[JesusJuice]

˙ʎɐp ǝɥʇ ʎq ɹǝʇʇǝq ƃuᴉʇʇǝƃ sᴉ ɹǝɥʇɐǝH ˙ʇɥƃᴉuoʇ ɹɐɟ os ɔᴉdoʇ puɐ ʇsǝnƃ ƃuᴉʇsǝɹǝʇuI

[starrmtn001]

No, she's not.

Yes, she is.

[starrmtn001]

Yes, I second that one. Check out this bad boy.

Nice work man!   Self portrait? 

[Roswells, Art]

No, she's not.

If you'll notice, he posted that 17 seconds into the show which is when the music is still playing. It made me laugh. I think he was joking.

[trostol]

how many sighs?

[trostol]

April Fools is just a silly silly thing

[Lil Godzilla]

Hehh hehh, she said pole

[starrmtn001]

how many sighs?

Trostol!   (Not taking any chances on greetings with you).

[trostol]

Trostol!   (Not taking any chances on greetings with you).

why hello there lol

[trostol]

thats pretty silly..immature..childish

[Lil Godzilla]

Sigh, another night of scintillating Heather...