I'm Speaking in Tongues: Comprende

[Yorkshire pud]

jesus, you are a simpleton. God motherfuckingdamn attracts some simplistic rule following idiots.

You owe me a new laptop screen...

Invoice in the post.

[onan]

You owe me a new laptop screen...

Invoice in the post.

would you like it made out of tin foil or a used etch a sketch?

[Yorkshire pud]

would you like it made out of tin foil or a used etch a sketch?

Etch a sketch would be an upgrade, so yes please.

[Tarbaby]

(Manwell comes running out of the kitchen)
"Eez fire! Eez fire! FUEGO!"
Fawlty: "Is no fire! Only drill!" (Pushes Manuel back into the kitchen… which is in flames)

Yes, that "speaking in tongues" sounds like it could be interesting. I have never studied it.Glossolalia, right? I mean study it from the secular approach.

[onan]

(Manwell comes running out of the kitchen)
"Eez fire! Eez fire! FUEGO!"
Fawlty: "Is no fire! Only drill!" (Pushes Manuel back into the kitchen… which is in flames)

Yes, that "speaking in tongues" sounds like it could be interesting. I have never studied it.Glossolalia, right? I mean study it from the secular approach.

if the presentation is from organic disease or symptom of a mental illness then yes glossolalia, otherwise... faking.

[analog kid]

jesus, you are still trying to figure him out? What is wrong with you?

Hell, I have no idea what's going on in 90% of these threads.

[someguy]

"Language of Light" DNA Activation 528 HZ Miracle Solfeggio Transmissions

[onan]

Hell, I have no idea what's going on in 90% of these threads.

Just these threads? you are a lucky man.

[McPhallus]

pUD YOU'RE A  waste of space, time, and all.  Your path is rocky indeed.

What would Jesus think of your butthurt-inducing post??

[WildCard]

Hi Shakina. OK, I'll listen with my heart . . .
28 seconds later-[attachimg=1]

[Stellar]

What would Jesus think of your butthurt-inducing post??

You are right that was harsh, my apologies to Yorkshire Pud.  I'm not infallible 100% of the time.  I was judging and that is Jesus's Realm!  In the Spirit of Truth, thank you McPallus.  And you have great discernment!  Point well taken.

As the comforter may I say if I claim to know it all I know nothing.  If I know something it will be scrutinized.  In regards to the Truth and the Way I love Jesus.  Truism with me has to be scrutinized so thank you McPallus.  My concern is with the path of man and the light knows that.  So in my error I only wish joy for man as I spread faith, yet I must not Judge.

[Catsmile]

[attachimg=1]

[analog kid]

Just these threads? you are a lucky man.

I mean, I try, but I admit I'm deluded and lying to myself.

[Stellar]

[attachimg=1]

? Are you a Reptillian Man? From the tip of Drako Constellation?  That was disgusting and yes I'm right.

[Yorkshire pud]

? Are you a Reptillian Man? From the tip of Drako Constellation?  That was disgusting and yes I'm right.

Leave him be; He was under protection and managed to go out of the secure area for a few hours to stock up on a few things; mainly popcorn, roast ham, parmaesan cheese,  penne pasta, and bagels.

It's now been taken care of and he's on the next flight to Drako after he's back at Langley...nothing to see.

[Tarbaby]

if the presentation is from organic disease or symptom of a mental illness then yes glossolalia, otherwise... faking.

yes, I assume they are all faking even if only unwittingly. But in the best cases of glossolalia I wonder if there is conformity to structure and internal integrity. IE., is it a consistent language(established or spontaneous) or just a string of gibberish. In the few cases I have heard the overall voice inflection is the same as if they were speaking English or their own base language. If I were just a bit more interested I would look up and see if there is any internal integrity or consistency to this spontaneous language, in a best case scenario.

When it's not out right fraud it's probably a form of mass hypnosis/suggestion I suppose. I think I might look into it.

[McPhallus]

Leave him be; He was under protection and managed to go out of the secure area for a few hours to stock up on a few things; mainly popcorn, roast ham, parmaesan cheese,  penne pasta, and bagels.

It's now been taken care of and he's on the next flight to Drako after he's back at Langley...nothing to see.

He could be the American David Icke!

[Yorkshire pud]

He could be the American David Icke!

I could never be so cruel to let the USA have it's own version of David Icke. You haven't done anything that warrants such a terrible punishment. No not even having  to admit to giving the world Alex Jones and David Wilcox means you also deserve a David Icke.

On second thoughts: You did give us Hoagland and Bara...

Yep, you can have an Icke.

[Robert Ghostwolf's Ghost]

On second thoughts: You did give us Hoagland and Bara...

Sorry for that, but I blame their parents.  They should have taken better precautions.

[Tarbaby]

Stellar "": in your worldview, why does God create man without an innate awareness of the connection between God and man? Why do men have to spend their lives trying to convert others? I would think God should have caught that flaw in the beta testing stage. And why does God care if we convert our fellow man? I'm not trying to be mean or Callous, but I never understood the reason for proselytization. If we are containers or vessels of gods essence then whether we consciously know it or not makes no difference. At the end we would return to theSource. and don't say because if one believes in God they act more morally because I haven't seen any sign of that whatsoever.

If you don't care to discuss this I apologize and withdraw immediately.

(Added in edit) if there is a God then all mankind are manifestations of that God in three dimensional reality. So God would have purposely omitted Self-knowledge so that each independent autonomous person would have a separate unique experience; thus God discovering itself in millions of lives throughout time (which by the way is also an illusion created by God) as part of the three dimensional reality). So, this obsession some have with convincing others of God's existence might actually be irritating God.

[Yorkshire pud]

I blame their parents.  They should have taken better precautions.

That's typical, blame someone else!!!  Hoagland and Bara have no shame, it isn't their parents' fault they squandered a loving and rounded upbringing to become the outstanding authors, scientists, web designers, DVD presenters, and public speakers, that they're not.

[Robert Ghostwolf's Ghost]

That's typical, blame someone else!!!  Hoagland and Bara have no shame, it isn't their parents' fault they squandered a loving and rounded upbringing to become the outstanding authors, scientists, web designers, DVD presenters, and public speakers, that they're not.

What's a shame is that the rest of us have had to suffer decades of pain because their parents just had to have their brief moments of pleasure. 

[Yorkshire pud]

What's a shame is that the rest of us have had to suffer decades of pain because their parents just had to have their brief moments of pleasure.

I cannot imagine for one minute that their parents took pleasure at any time in each others company; let alone with their clothes off..The thought repulses me.

[Robert Ghostwolf's Ghost]

I cannot imagine for one minute that their parents took pleasure at any time in each others company; let alone with their clothes off..The thought repulses me.

Hater.

[Yorkshire pud]

Hater.

I'm told I'm a liberal too... Rubbish..I'm all for the drowning of pseudo scientists. I know the lilly livered think it's cruel but it's the only option.

[Stellar]

Stellar "": in your worldview, why does God create man without an innate awareness of the connection between God and man? Why do men have to spend their lives trying to convert others? I would think God should have caught that flaw in the beta testing stage. And why does God care if we convert our fellow man? I'm not trying to be mean or Callous, but I never understood the reason for proselytization. If we are containers or vessels of gods essence then whether we consciously know it or not makes no difference. At the end we would return to theSource. and don't say because if one believes in God they act more morally because I haven't seen any sign of that whatsoever.

If you don't care to discuss this I apologize and withdraw immediately.

(Added in edit) if there is a God then all mankind are manifestations of that God in three dimensional reality. So God would have purposely omitted Self-knowledge so that each independent autonomous person would have a separate unique experience; thus God discovering itself in millions of lives throughout time (which by the way is also an illusion created by God) as part of the three dimensional reality). So, this obsession some have with convincing others of God's existence might actually be irritating God.

TAR-

Hmmm did not Jesus say, "Go out and preach the Good News"?  There are 2 path's here alone one Heavenly the other Hell.  Enough said.

[Tarbaby]

TAR-

Hmmm did not Jesus say, "Go out and preach the Good News"?  There are 2 path's here alone one Heavenly the other Hell.  Enough said.

I suppose if I had any belief that a 2000-year-old book would have relevance or meaning for modern times I might consider that some sort of answer. But I don't and it isn't. I was aiming at a direct answer from your own thoughts, not from ancient indoctrination. With all due respect I've been hearing that religious doubletalk my whole life. It seems to be the refuge of people who are  too afraid to forge their own destiny. People who have succumbed to existential angst.

That book you cite has been radically edited and altered over the centuries most notably at the Council of Nicaea where they took out  doctrines they didn't like and added books they did like.(From the Apocrypha). Various major doctrines (like reincarnation) were taken out completely. I always feel vaguely insulted when people try to exchange ideas about their religion and really know nothing about it. I will withdraw please.

[albrecht]

I suppose if I had any belief that a 2000-year-old book would have relevance or meaning for modern times I might consider that some sort of answer.

That kind of thinking is absurd. So no books from the past have any relevance or meaning in modern times? I guess we should just rely on YouTube or MTV for our teaching of history, science, philosophy, or mathematics? Because "old books" have no relevance.  And you lot think those fundamentalist Christian types like to burn books!? But you say no books have relevance.

[Yorkshire pud]

That kind of thinking is absurd. So no books from the past have any relevance or meaning in modern times? I guess we should just rely on YouTube or MTV for our teaching of history, science, philosophy, or mathematics? Because "old books" have no relevance.  And you lot think those fundamentalist Christian types like to burn books!? But you say no books have relevance.

The bible has been re-written several times; it was first written at least 40-50 years after Jesus died. It's just a collection of stories. It's just taken as the definitive article because of indoctrination, not because it's a definitive reference. 

[albrecht]

The bible has been re-written several times; it was first written at least 40-50 years after Jesus died. It's just a collection of stories. It's just taken as the definitive article because of indoctrination, not because it's a definitive reference.

Sure, and always finding new fragments, better translations, different languages, etc. Still an important book like many others through out history. To claim that books don't matter or aren't relevant because they were written in the past is crazy. We would have no history, laws, science, philosophy, religion, or culture etc if we don't build on our past, retain and archive our stuff, etc and that was done primarily through books. Re: the Bible- you can't understand much of modern European and American history, lectures, social movements, wars, music, literature, political speeches without having at least some basic knowledge about it. To say "not relevant" is absurd. Even today people like Obama will use it in political speeches. If you don't get the reference than you miss the message.