• Welcome to BellGab/bellchan Archive.
 

Hillary Clinton

Started by albrecht, June 21, 2014, 09:05:45 AM

Jackstar

Quote from: albrecht on November 06, 2016, 01:08:51 PM
And what about directing the maid to print out the emails or receive confidential faxes- even in the secured room?

I don't think it's plausible to imagine that Hillary Clinton would employ a non-White maid that could read.

Jackstar

Quote from: Donald Noory on November 06, 2016, 01:11:17 PM
Hillary's aid had clearance.

It's remarkable how fast you get talking points out. Simply fascinating.

theONE

Quote from: aldousburbank on November 06, 2016, 10:53:23 AM
Hillary Heather is honest, genuine, caring, attractive, has a sexy voice, and is the best choice for a positive future for all Americans. How's that?
#skyisnotblue

FIFY -this version suites you better ald ..... LOL

NowhereInTime

Quote from: albrecht on November 06, 2016, 01:08:51 PM
So was the stuff taken by "Chelsea" Manning, and the stuff being leaked by Wikileaks, etc. Taking/making duplicates itself and allowing them to be read by those without clearances, I thought, was a crime? And what about directing the maid to print out the emails or receive confidential faxes- even in the secured room? Actually it wouldn't surprise me if, after all, it is the poor Filipino maid who bears the costs of the Clinton Machine's crimes or "bad judgements." Haha.

Hey, there he is! Blaming a brown minority. You haven't lost your touch!

Donald Noory

Quote from: Jackstar on November 06, 2016, 01:16:44 PM
It's remarkable how fast you get talking points out. Simply fascinating.

It's a conspiracy.

GravitySucks

Quote from: Jackstar on November 06, 2016, 01:16:44 PM
It's remarkable how fast you get talking points out. Simply fascinating.

I seriously doubt that a MAID (not aid) had a TS/SCI clearance. Very unusual.

Clearances and access are granted on a need to know basis. She had unescorted access to the SCIF. Very unusual.

Jackstar

Quote from: Donald Noory on November 06, 2016, 01:25:51 PM
It's a conspiracy game.

Indeed, we've been getting your 'A' game for weeks, while Hitlary Clinton has let slip away a commanding lead. Who could have seen this coming? What can explain these mysterious turns of events??

No one is falling for your bullshit. Reap the whirlwind.

Jackstar

Quote from: GravitySucks on November 06, 2016, 01:27:24 PM
Clearances and access are granted on a need to know basis. She had unescorted access to the SCIF. Very unusual.

This alleged maid is probably some kind of disclosure dodge. If it were a legitimate facet, that would have spilled long before now on SNL.

Quote from: GravitySucks on November 06, 2016, 01:27:24 PM
I seriously doubt that a MAID (not aid) had a TS/SCI clearance. Very unusual.

Clearances and access are granted on a need to know basis. She had unescorted access to the SCIF. Very unusual.

Do the liberal shitheads of Bellgab really believe a foreign born housekeeper working privately in someones home had top secret and classified clearance?

Donald Noory

Quote from: Jackstar on November 06, 2016, 01:30:52 PM
Indeed, we've been getting your 'A' game for weeks, while Hitlary Clinton has let slip away a commanding lead. Who could have seen this coming? What can explain these mysterious turns of events??

No one is falling for your bullshit. Reap the whirlwind.

Any word on when you finally unleash your "A" game?


Donald Noory

Nice try distorting the "maid" angle, Trumptard douchebags.

The New York Post published a front page report alleging that Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton “routinely asked her maid to print out sensitive government e-mails and documents -- including ones containing classified information,” but ignored the fact the emails in question were classified years after the fact. The report cited only two classified emails, both of which were retroactively classified at the lowest level of classification, a practice which is consistent with past State Department actions. Additionally, in both confidential emails Clinton did not request that her maid print the emails. The author of the report has a history of inaccurate reporting when it comes to Clinton’s emails.

http://mediamatters.org/research/2016/11/06/conservatives-run-ny-post-story-about-maid-printing-clintons-emails-botch-classification-history/214345

GravitySucks

Quote from: (((The King of Kings))) on November 06, 2016, 01:36:26 PM
Do the liberal shitheads of Bellgab really believe a foreign born housekeeper working privately in someones home had top secret and classified clearance?

Every MSM article I have found says she did not have a clearance. Just allowing her unescorted access to the SCIF inside of her home would be a felony. The FBI 302's document the fact that the SCIF was usually unlocked.

http://nypost.com/2016/11/06/clinton-directed-her-maid-to-print-out-classified-materials/

Donald Noory

Quote from: (((The King of Kings))) on November 06, 2016, 01:36:26 PM
Do the liberal shitheads of Bellgab really believe a foreign born housekeeper working privately in someones home had top secret and classified clearance?

Do fucktard kids like you believe every right-wing talking point?

Donald Noory

Quote from: GravitySucks on November 06, 2016, 01:40:59 PM
Every MSM article I have found says she did not have a clearance. Just allowing her unescorted access to the SCIF inside of her home woukd be a felony.

http://nypost.com/2016/11/06/clinton-directed-her-maid-to-print-out-classified-materials/

Yeah, keep quoting the discredited NY Post article, ya dumb redneck Trumptard.

The New York Post published a front page report alleging that Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton “routinely asked her maid to print out sensitive government e-mails and documents -- including ones containing classified information,” but ignored the fact the emails in question were classified years after the fact. The report cited only two classified emails, both of which were retroactively classified at the lowest level of classification, a practice which is consistent with past State Department actions. Additionally, in both confidential emails Clinton did not request that her maid print the emails. The author of the report has a history of inaccurate reporting when it comes to Clinton’s emails.

http://mediamatters.org/research/2016/11/06/conservatives-run-ny-post-story-about-maid-printing-clintons-emails-botch-classification-history/214345

Jackstar

Quote from: Donald Noory on November 06, 2016, 01:43:11 PM
The author of the report has a history of inaccurate reporting when it comes to Clinton’s emails.

Then he must be working for her,  or she would have had him killed long ago, lulz

GravitySucks

Quote from: Donald Noory on November 06, 2016, 01:43:11 PM
Yeah, keep quoting the discredited NY Post article, ya dumb redneck Trumptard.

The New York Post published a front page report alleging that Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton “routinely asked her maid to print out sensitive government e-mails and documents -- including ones containing classified information,” but ignored the fact the emails in question were classified years after the fact. The report cited only two classified emails, both of which were retroactively classified at the lowest level of classification, a practice which is consistent with past State Department actions. Additionally, in both confidential emails Clinton did not request that her maid print the emails. The author of the report has a history of inaccurate reporting when it comes to Clinton’s emails.

http://mediamatters.org/research/2016/11/06/conservatives-run-ny-post-story-about-maid-printing-clintons-emails-botch-classification-history/214345

And you quote David Brock as a reputable source? 

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3910326/Clinton-instructed-housekeeper-print-emails-including-classified-materials-Washington-residence.html



Quote from: NowhereInTime on November 06, 2016, 12:28:20 PM
Just Breaking:

Comey just issued a release saying July decision not to prosecute on newest batch of emails stands.
Once again, much ado about nothing.

Dream on, cons.
Of note, he is just referring to the emails sent by Hillary.  Not to the other info found on Weiner's device.


albrecht

Assuming that Hollywood, banks, and media win the election- I think it could still be very close or even one of those Bush/Gore, popular win but electoral fail for Trump, or better yet like 1824 Jackson/Adams- it shows how weak, unpopular, and corrupt she is, if elected already almost a 'lame duck.' So, hopefully, lots of government gridlock (assuming the House or Senate doesn't go Democratic) and, maybe, there is not much of a history of Republicans fight back against really doing it, of Congress cutting off funding for her radical executive actions (like amnesty,) not approving or even hearing her judicial appointments, over turning her veto, not passing her "gold standard" TPP (even if she changes it slightly so she can claim "it is not the TPP" etc,) and more investigations into her scandals.

Jackstar

Quote from: albrecht on November 06, 2016, 02:28:59 PM
I think it could still be very close or even one of those Bush/Gore, popular win but electoral fail for Trump,

They've already pulled this dodge, recently, and it didn't seem to go over well. Do you really think they'd do it that way again? Seems like too much risk in today's geopolitical environment.

Female Hillary Supporters calmly and rationally share their view points with a Trump supporter.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tLmNI0omIe8

albrecht

Quote from: Jackstar on November 06, 2016, 02:46:48 PM
They've already pulled this dodge, recently, and it didn't seem to go over well. Do you really think they'd do it that way again? Seems like too much risk in today's geopolitical environment.
True, I'm just thinking of scenarios. Ponder this, if it went, somehow, to the Court the Court only has 8 on it and split down the line (mostly.) Lots of interesting possible scenarios that rarely if ever, but technically could, happen even becoming deadlocked and the Speaker serving as President if House is deadlocked on Pres and Senate is deadlocked on VP election. Never happened so would be neat to see. And what if Electors (of conscience) in States where legal refuse to vote or vote for someone other than what the popular vote was?

Jackstar

Quote from: (((The King of Kings))) on November 06, 2016, 02:49:38 PM
Female Hillary Supporters calmly and rationally share their view points

So badly wishing to ask these chicks if Aristotle Socrates Onassis was an upgrade or not. I usually save the quizzes for a fourth date, but that shrill one on the right looks special.

Jackstar

Quote from: albrecht on November 06, 2016, 02:59:17 PM
And what if Electors (of conscience)

Well, I guess we'll find out when monkeys fly out of my butt.



Shillers for Hitlery BTFO!

GravitySucks

Quote from: albrecht on November 06, 2016, 02:59:17 PM
True, I'm just thinking of scenarios. Ponder this, if it went, somehow, to the Court the Court only has 8 on it and split down the line (mostly.) Lots of interesting possible scenarios that rarely if ever, but technically could, happen even becoming deadlocked and the Speaker serving as President if House is deadlocked on Pres and Senate is deadlocked on VP election. Never happened so would be neat to see. And what if Electors (of conscience) in States where legal refuse to vote or vote for someone other than what the popular vote was?

That is all predicted in Hoagie's model. And we can't hear it play out because his frikking check bounced.


albrecht

Quote from: GravitySucks on November 06, 2016, 03:06:38 PM
That is all predicted in Hoagie's model. And we can't hear it play out because his frikking check bounced.
The combined total of Electors, and popular vote, will go to one of the either "3rd Party" candidates will be 19.5%, enough so neither gets enough and it goes to the House...
I miss good RCH. But wouldn't mind to hear him rant about the election on election night and afterwards.

Powered by SMFPacks Menu Editor Mod