The Illustrated Protocols of Zion - by David Duke

[Chaim]

http://youtu.be/d-xjLa9xrOo

looks like scumbag Duke just released a new book, and here's his video introduction. Didn't watch it yet. The original is generally considered to be some kind of forgery. What do you think? Was it a forgery, or do we only claim it is a forgery because the very people this book talks about are currently in power?
Shalom!

[Kelt]

One thing that disturbs me just as much as anti-semitism is the haste with which any dialogue regarding Israel/Judasim/The Holocaust is called anti-semitic unless that dialogue completely agrees with and supports Israeli/Judaic/Holocaust canon.

For example, were I to call into question the numbers cited regarding Stalin's genocides, pogroms, and purges I'd be free to discuss, investigate, and question those numbers.  Were I to do the same regarding the Holocaust I'd run the very real risk of being called a Holocaust Denier and sent to prison.  There are actually laws in place to prevent people from so much as questioning the official line.  In Austria you can get up to 20 years in prison, according to Wiki.

Simply raising this point probably makes me a 'hate-filled anti-semite.'

EDIT: Oh, as far as the 'Protocols of Zion' is concerned, It's considered a fraud, apparently.  And listening to the fruitloops in your link I would say it's probably a lodestone for other fruitloops and anti-semites. 

I'm sure it'll sell well amongst the fringe fruitloop and anti-semitic community.

[albrecht]

One thing that disturbs me just as much as anti-semitism is the haste with which any dialogue regarding Israel/Judasim/The Holocaust is immediately called anti-semitic unless that dialogue completely agrees with and supports Israeli/Judaic/Holocaust canon.

For example, were I to call into question the numbers cited regarding Stalin's genocides, pogroms, and purges I'd be free to discuss, investigate, and question those numbers.  Were I to do the same regarding the Holocaust I'd run the very real risk of being called a Holocaust Denier and sent to prison.  There are actually laws in place to prevent people from so much as questioning the official line.  In Austria you can get up to 20 years in prison, according to Wiki.

Simply raising this point probably makes me a 'hate-filled anti-semite.'

There can be no historical review or questioning of official numbers except, maybe, by a member of a certain faith (and those numbers better be revised up.) Frankly, I'm a little surprised that Stalin can still be criticized but we have Khrushchev to thank for that. Because official communist policy said it was ok- so we can still question Stalin but stay away from anything else. (By the way, Arabs are also Semitic people, and many of the Jews aren't Semitic, so how can Arabs, Lebanese Christians, etc be anti-Semitic? Some could be Anti-Jewish, Anti-Zionist, sure. But not anti-Semitic- unless they also hate themselves I guess.)

Get on Stormfront or a David Duke page you anti-semite!

But more seriously, I think it is because the connection to the holocaust that many in the US and in Europe have versus Stalin's (and other's) mass murders and genocides. Either people lost family members- or have the shame of having family members on the "other side" and helped perpetrate such crimes. Or just the guilt of doing nothing about them (the US even refusing to take refugees when we knew what was going on, neutral countries in Europe doing nothing and taking NAZI money but- not taking in fleeing Jews, foreign legions of SS from countries, decent support for invading NAZIs in France, etc etc.) So much guilt to go around it is better not to investigate it, certainly if the numbers would go down, illuminate other participants in the crimes, etc.