President Donald J. Trump

[GravitySucks]

Yeah.  First he was bragging that he had a mandate.  Now that he's millions behind he says the popular vote was rigged.  Maybe he doesn't know the meaning of 'mandate'.  He's not too bright.

[GuerrillaUnReal]

See, leftist con-job all along.

[Humilia Lepus Foramen]

He claims it was just "irony," but I remember in the time immediately following September 11 such a joke would've landed you in trouble. 

[Dr. MD MD]

He claims it was just "irony," but I remember in the time immediately following September 11 such a joke would've landed you in trouble.

It could still be an actionable statement if a terrorist actually does that. 

[Jackstar]

It's so beautiful. I wanna make it a tattoo. I cry every time.

[Jackstar]

Now that he's millions behind he says

It's been rigged for him since before the day he was even born.

I suppose you thought I were joking here.

the popular vote was rigged.

Okay, number one, it fucking well was. What are you, new? Like honestly--there's no evidence it wasn't, so how do the talking mouthpieces come by their certitude?

Go on, think this one over. I'll wait.

Meanwhile, secondly, there's a distinction to be made between "the whole election is rigged" and "some of the votes were cast fraudulently." Which one are you trying to conflate with the other here? I'm asking for myself here.

Maybe he doesn't know the meaning of 'mandate'.  He's not too bright.

What do those % numbers that aren't white people add up to? That's right, twenty-nine percent.

I suppose it matters how one weights percentages when calculating the mandate--but notice that it's not called a "femdate." That's something else.

[GuerrillaUnReal]

Hillary Clinton’s night on the 9th of November went from a celebration to an absolute meltdown once the election unexpectedly turned on her, leaving Trump as the victor. Some of the remnants of Hillary Clinton’s rampage in the private VIP area was discovered by the hotel custodial staff the day following the election.

Hillary Clinton’s post election celebration plans included hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of fireworks, live performances by various celebrities, such as Cher, who came believing that Hillary was going to win the election, a five-hundred-thousand-dollar special effect glass ceiling that she would break through in a dramatic display once she walked out on stage at her H.Q., among millions of dollars worth of other celebratory preparations, all paid for by the Clinton Foundation in full.

The most notable damage was located deep in the VIP room of the Clinton camp. A custom 150 inch ultra HD TV, a gift from the Saudi Arabian government, was found with a broken screen. The damage was caused by a $950,000 bottle of champagne that was believed to have been thrown at the screen by the former presidential candidate some time during the election.

Early in the morning, the custodial staff were greeted by flipped-over tables as the floors were covered with expensive food, drinks, and appetizers. Broken champagne flutes and gilded silverware were also seen scattered around the would-be party room.

The most telling sign of a massive meltdown was the cake. The pastry that had once proudly displayed the presidential seal, was violently flung against the walls in chunks. A broken topper from the cake in the shape of the white house was discovered lodged firmly into the drywall near the dessert table.

https://www.theburningplatform.com/2016/11/25/a-meltdown-of-evil-conquered-from-within/#more-137115

[Jackstar]

Early in the morning, the custodial staff were greeted by flipped-over tables as the floors were covered with expensive food,

Hanging is too good for her.

[Dr. MD MD]

Hanging is too good for her.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z-_I_KOSEJs

[mikuthing01]

Hillary Clinton’s night on the 9th of November went from a celebration to an absolute meltdown once the election unexpectedly turned on her, leaving Trump as the victor. Some of the remnants of Hillary Clinton’s rampage in the private VIP area was discovered by the hotel custodial staff the day following the election.

Hillary Clinton’s post election celebration plans included hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of fireworks, live performances by various celebrities, such as Cher, who came believing that Hillary was going to win the election, a five-hundred-thousand-dollar special effect glass ceiling that she would break through in a dramatic display once she walked out on stage at her H.Q., among millions of dollars worth of other celebratory preparations, all paid for by the Clinton Foundation in full.

The most notable damage was located deep in the VIP room of the Clinton camp. A custom 150 inch ultra HD TV, a gift from the Saudi Arabian government, was found with a broken screen. The damage was caused by a $950,000 bottle of champagne that was believed to have been thrown at the screen by the former presidential candidate some time during the election.

Early in the morning, the custodial staff were greeted by flipped-over tables as the floors were covered with expensive food, drinks, and appetizers. Broken champagne flutes and gilded silverware were also seen scattered around the would-be party room.

The most telling sign of a massive meltdown was the cake. The pastry that had once proudly displayed the presidential seal, was violently flung against the walls in chunks. A broken topper from the cake in the shape of the white house was discovered lodged firmly into the drywall near the dessert table.

https://www.theburningplatform.com/2016/11/25/a-meltdown-of-evil-conquered-from-within/#more-137115

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BXWvKDSwvls

[pyewacket]

[Yorkshire pud]

Forget Clinton..this is what your boy has in store for you...

Trump proposes to reduce the number of tax brackets from seven to three, with rates of 12 percent, 25 percent and 33 percent. That would slash the top rate from the current 39.6 percent. He would repeal the estate tax, which affects only about 0.2 percent of estates -- those worth above $5.45 million.

For middle-income earners as a whole, the Trump proposals would cut taxes, even taking into account the increases on single-parent families. Those earning nearly $50,000 to about $83,000 -- the middle one-fifth  -- would receive an average cut of $1,010, according to the Tax Policy Center. That would lift their after-tax incomes 1.8 percent.

By contrast, the wealthiest 1 percent -- those earning over $700,000 -- would enjoy a tax cut averaging nearly $215,000, boosting their after-tax incomes 13.5 percent. And the richest 0.1 percent -- those making above $3.7 million -- would receive a bonanza: An average tax cut exceeding $1 million.

[Jackstar]

What's interesting is that for many years, this country got along just fine with zero dollars as income taxes.

We're going to make America great again. Count on it.

[GuerrillaUnReal]

Forget Clinton..this is what your boy has in store for you...

This is bad... because?

Oh no, Trump is going to cut my taxes and reform perhaps the most corrupt entity in the US Government.

SOMEBODY STOP THAT MAN!!!

:

[Yorkshire pud]

This is bad... because?

Oh no, Trump is going to cut my taxes and reform perhaps the most corrupt entity in the US Government.

SOMEBODY STOP THAT MAN!!!

:

You think that's the clincher? What about the establishment he is so against? Lol...

[Big Chicken]

This is bad... because?

Oh no, Trump is going to cut my taxes and reform perhaps the most corrupt entity in the US Government.

Big Chicken is trying to figure that one out as well. I get to keep more of my money but that is somehow bad?

[GuerrillaUnReal]

You think that's the clincher? What about the establishment he is so against? Lol...

Hitting the bottle this evening?

[Yorkshire pud]

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/11/28/analysis-for-some-in-middle-class-trump-plan-would-mean-tax-increase.html

All independent analyses show most of the benefit of Trump's plan flowing to the wealthiest Americans. Nearly half of Trump's tax cuts would go to the top 1 percent of earners, the Tax Policy Center found. Less than a quarter of the cuts would benefit the bottom 80 percent.

[PB the Deplorable]

I don't think you have a clue what 'the left' is, you just hear a dog whistle and start barking. If Trump gets in and starts putting up tariffs then that's anti-competitive and about as 'leftist' as it gets. Everyone who saw the election as leftists v conservatives got so lost in the media haze that they didn't know what they were voting for, as long as it wasn't 'leftist', whatever the hell that even means. Hillary was actually the conservative choice. Trump is a leap in the dark, whatever else you might say; particularly given that nobody knows what he stands for, including him.

Yes, Hilary was the conservative (lowercase 'c') candidate.  Which means she stood for more of the same:  open borders with more gang and cartel members flowing in, an ever growing national debt, more unvetted Moslem immigrants, continuation of the shredding of the Constitution, the deplorables continuing to burn our downtowns, block traffic, and attack police, more murders of police, more terrible foreign policy moves and non-moves, continuation of the Obama economy, etc, etc, etc.

The Conservatives (uppercase 'C') are the opposite of all that.  We are the true Jeffersonian Liberals, have been all along.  In fact, right now, we are the radicals.


Trump is a leap in the dark, absolutely correct.  But we know precisely what we would have gotten with Mrs Clinton - and we rejected it out of hand - no matter what Trump does he'll be better than what we would have gotten with that piece of filth.  And so far, he's picking some great people and is looking pretty good.

[GuerrillaUnReal]

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/11/28/analysis-for-some-in-middle-class-trump-plan-would-mean-tax-increase.html

Where is the majority of wealth in society?

[albrecht]

Big Chicken is trying to figure that one out as well. I get to keep more of my money but that is somehow bad?

Because some people value the idea of seeing someone else harmed or wealth diminished rather than look to their bottom-line or situation. It is not logical but based on emotion and greed. If some guy says: "hey you two I'm going to give you some money. And gives $15 to you and $10 to me a certain type of person will bitch and say- "how come he got $15?" Instead of thinking: "hey I just got $10.") (This is somewhat a simplistic example.) The rich pay more into the pot, so it is logical that any across the board tax-decrease would benefit them more in overall terms. Personally I would rather a national sales tax or flat tax but too many accountants, government bureaucrats, and tax attorneys to ever go to a simple system.

[Yorkshire pud]

Where is the majority of wealth in society?

Your point? The super rich get richer? Like Trump?

[GuerrillaUnReal]

I'm pretty concerned about the coming approach of government on the internet. A lot of shit is about to change rapidly. First with ICANN getting fucked with, the expansion of Rule 41 allowing FBI to hack anyone who uses TOR, VPNs or other anon software and Trump seemingly going after net neutrality. This could turn into a nightmare if the pieces fall like it looks like they might.

[PB the Deplorable]

... 13% of illegal aliens is over a million votes, that is pretty significant...

13% ADMIT they voted

... why hasn't Trump presented any evidence?...

What evidence would there be?

The Libs in many, if not most, states have it set up so anyone applying for a drivers license is automatically given a voter registration form.  No proof of citizenship required.  Illegals are encouraged to get drivers licenses, and also insurance (haha). 

The Libs in many, if not most, states have it set up so no ID needed to vote in those states. 

There is no database to prevent people for signing up to vote in different states.  Anyone can sign up to vote early or vote absentee, so it's not difficult to do so.

There are Lib politicians - including Obama this time around - on video either suggesting it's ok for illegals to vote, or flat out asking them to.  Hate groups like La Raza encourage it.

But you need ''evidence''.  How do you propose someone get 'evidence' when no ID, no proof of citizenship is requested? 

[GuerrillaUnReal]

Your point? The super rich get richer? Like Trump?

If taxes were being cut across the board, don't you think it'd benefit the wealthy the most since they have the most money? That's how math works.

[Dr. MD MD]

Because some people value the idea of seeing someone else harmed or wealth diminished rather than look to their bottom-line or situation. It is not logical but based on emotion and greed. If some guy says: "hey you two I'm going to give you some money. And gives $15 to you and $10 to me a certain type of person will bitch and say- "how come he got $15?" Instead of thinking: "hey I just got $10.") (This is somewhat a simplistic example.) The rich pay more into the pot, so it is logical that any across the board tax-decrease would benefit them more in overall terms. Personally I would rather a national sales tax or flat tax but too many accountants, government bureaucrats, and tax attorneys to ever go to a simple system.

I believe that Steve Forbes is one of the guys who has access to Trump's ear and, as I'm sure you remember, this was his big thing. I've even heard people on the left who are for it because they say that as long as loopholes for the rich are cut out at least they'll be paying something because, as we all know, they're rich enough to afford the kind of lawyers and accountants that can find creative ways for them to avoid pay much of anything. I'd be alright with trying out a flat tax.

[albrecht]

I'm pretty concerned about the coming approach of government on the internet. A lot of shit is about to change rapidly. First with ICANN getting fucked with, the expansion of Rule 41 allowing FBI to hack anyone who uses TOR, VPNs or other anon software and Trump seemingly going after net neutrality. This could turn into a nightmare if the pieces fall like it looks like they might.

Yeah, we still have it a lot better than many countries but there are troubling developments. Frankly I've always thought things like TOR, PGP, Anon-remailers and the whole internet in general etc were "government ops" anyway and just a way to snare criminals, or blackmail people, with a simple strategy of making people think they have some privacy or anonymity. But I agree with you on Rule 41 changes and the like. The stuff just passed in the UK is crazy.

[WOTR]

Also, WI election officials have denied the request for a hand count. Therefore, they will use balloting machines and finish the recount before the 13th. Another fail for Soros/Stein/Clinton.

That evil Soros is everywhere.  Now he even wanted to make sure that votes were counted correctly.  The bastard!


Where's Soros?

[albrecht]

I believe that Steve Forbes is one of the guys who has access to Trump's ear and, as I'm sure you remember, this was his big thing. I've even heard people on the left who are for it because they say that as long as loopholes for the rich are cut out at least they'll be paying something because, as we all know, they're rich enough to afford the kind of lawyers and accountants that can find creative ways for them to avoid pay much of anything. I'd be alright with trying out a flat tax.

Forbes had several good ideas, unfortunately a sort of odd looking guy and with a name like Forbes jars a certain portion of the electorate. He also had a good idea back when about a sorta of "English-speaking (mainly) trading bloc." Sort of a US-Commonwealth Nations agreement, but for real free trade, not more bureaucracy or job give-aways to other countries or race-to-the-bottom in wage or working conditions.

[Dr. MD MD]

I'm thinking Trump is going to pick Gingrich as his secretary of state now.