SBX-1

[McPhallus]

In this life, I taught myself to read before the age of three. And, I just taught you how to kiss it.

Everyone's a child genius on the Interwebs, my friend.

[wr250]

I think I should add: Neutron flux isn't a physical object. It isn't even a particle. Now you know that can you explain how neutron flux ties into the context of your previous post? Thanks.

Here's a clue. Think, distance..

Yorkshire, he doesnt even know who is in that picture i posted; on a board that is dedicated to how much that person sucks. why on earth would he know anything about neutron flux?

[Mind Flayer Monk]

Oh goody... Checkmate...
10 characteristics of conspiracy theorists
A useful guide by Donna Ferentes

All of you are sheeple.
I have won this internet debate.

It is amazing how big that SBX-1 is.

[jazmunda]

All of you are sheeple.
I have won this internet debate.

It is amazing how big that SBX-1 is.

Imagine how big the SBX-2 will be. Or, unlike Star Trek, do things get smaller? If this was Doctor Who imagine how big it would be on this inside. Just saying.

[Yorkshire pud]

Imagine how big the SBX-2 will be. Or, unlike Star Trek, do things get smaller? If this was Doctor Who imagine how big it would be on this inside. Just saying.

I'm imagining.................................................................Yeah. Bigger than a big thing.

[Jackstar]

Well, he didn't answer my question either, shrug. I'm willing to wager that The Ice Cream Truck drove through his neighborhood this week.

Everyone's a child genius on the Interwebs, my friend.

I am not lying. Also, I am told that my first spoken word was "fuck." I do not necessarily believe this, nor have memory of the event, but my mother and father swore up and down that this was true.

None of this means much--I still dangle the occasional participle, and I don't give a fuck what a gerund is--but don't sit there and tell me that the illiterate get the same citizens' rights and privileges as the literate do.

They don't. For one thing, know won knows what the fuck they are even talking a boot. For another--no one cares.

[Jackstar]

If I have to do primary research on this myself, everyone is going to be sorry.

[Jackstar]

Conspiracy Theories

In recent years since its deployment the SBX-1 has been the target of controversy and accusations. Especially on YouTube and various blogs. To some the radar has been thought of as a constituent to HAARP. In particular as a device used for initiating earthquakes and controlling the weather. One example cites the device emits microwaves which excite water molecules redirecting atmospheric moisture to other parts of the globe. Even if that were possible, the energy demands needed to do so would be far greater than current energy capabilities could supply in such a short timeframe. A microwave oven for example uses nearly a kilowatt of power to heat up a liter of water. To energize the water content of a thunder cloud (approximately a billion liters) would require nearly a terawatt of energy output, far in excess of the generators onboard capacity let alone the energy output of the radar. Others in local communities claim the radar interferes with radio and television signals and Wi-Fi in their city when brought to port for repair. However interference attributed to the device is false given the fact the radar remains shut down when brought to port. The Texas Towers and their AN/FPS-20 radar operated at a higher power level. SBX-1 is often very intimidating to locals given it's massive size when brought to port, understandable as most typical offshore radar installations are often built in sequence and permanently put into place.

No sources, natch.

[Yorkshire pud]

No sources, natch.

Weird that. Because when CT get on a roll their only source is other CT's or some 'shill' site that has some spurious connection. What usually happens though is some totally unconnected aspect ( also a CT) is introduced. A good example might be 'chem trails'. Overlooking the fact that they're not. The funny sideline to that is there is a YT video shot by a USAF cockpit (tanker) crew, line astern of another at high altitude, and give a spoof commentary of 'chem trails'. The comments are full of fuckwits who believe it's an admission. These same fuckwits are allowed to breed. Scary.

[Stellar]

Weird that. Because when CT get on a roll their only source is other CT's or some 'shill' site that has some spurious connection. What usually happens though is some totally unconnected aspect ( also a CT) is introduced. A good example might be 'chem trails'. Overlooking the fact that they're not. The funny sideline to that is there is a YT video shot by a USAF cockpit (tanker) crew, line astern of another at high altitude, and give a spoof commentary of 'chem trails'. The comments are full of fuckwits who believe it's an admission. These same fuckwits are allowed to breed. Scary.

Yorkshire you are not ignorant yet you act as tho you are the final say.

Yorkshire this is unrelated to the SBX-1, Yet with all this proof that many high ranking and low ranking military officials knew of the the attack at Pearl Harbor prior. Do you believe this?

“All warfare is based on deception.”
― Sun Tzu, The Art of War

Machiavellianism is, according to the Oxford English Dictionary, "the employment of cunning and duplicity in statecraft or in general conduct"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machiavellianism

Pearl Harbor - At 7:02 a.m., two Army operators at Oahu's northern shore radar station detect the Japanese air attack approaching and contact a junior officer who disregards their reports, thinking they are American B-17 planes which are expected in from the U.S. west coast.

At 7:53 a.m., the first Japanese assault wave, with 51 'Val' dive bombers, 40 'Kate' torpedo bombers, 50 high level bombers and 43 'Zero' fighters, commences the attack with flight commander, Mitsuo Fuchida, sounding the battle cry: "Tora! Tora! Tora!" (Tiger! Tiger! Tiger!).http://www.historyplace.com/worldwar2/timeline/pearl.htm

The Japanese purple cipher was first and partially broken in August, 1940.
http://ciphermachines.com/purple
Pearl Harbor memo shows US warned of Japanese attack
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/8932197/Pearl-Harbour-memo-shows-US-warned-of-Japanese-attack.html

[Yorkshire pud]

Yorkshire you are not ignorant yet you act as tho you are the final say.

I wasn't aware there was a quota on how often bullshit can be refuted?

Yorkshire this is unrelated to the SBX-1, Yet with all this proof that many high ranking and low ranking military officials knew of the the attack at Pearl Harbor prior. Do you believe this?
The Japanese purple cipher was first and partially broken in August, 1940.
http://ciphermachines.com/purple
Pearl Harbor memo shows US warned of Japanese attack
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/8932197/Pearl-Harbour-memo-shows-US-warned-of-Japanese-attack.html

You're right, entirely unrelated. And irrelevant. It's how the military works. Junior officers know what they see, but the higher ranking ones (in the 1940's) don't want to believe it and frequently disregarded information because their vanity prevented them to be the ones to shout that the sky was falling in. Instead of them falling on their sword because they might be wrong, it's easier to let a lower rank get the flack.

But back the SBX, just how does it generate the power to do as you suggest it does? I mean, to me, Joe down the road and even dead people, it looks just like a radar dome on top (usually made from Fibre glass)..So it emits radar signals...

Your ball. In your own words.

[Jackstar]

One example cites the device emits microwaves which excite water molecules redirecting atmospheric moisture to other parts of the globe. Even if that were possible,

Wikipedia: now the adjudicator of what is and is not possible. All those donations must have really added up. Speaking of adding up:

Cost: $900 million
Crew: Approximately 75-85 members, mostly civilian contractors

What does this thing need to do before its unusual nature becomes evident to you? Fly the flag of Dr. No? Transform into a casino discotheque? Download Metallica from Napster? What? Because it obviously does more than "detect ballistic missile launches."

[Yorkshire pud]

Wikipedia: now the adjudicator of what is and is not possible. All those donations must have really added up. Speaking of adding up:

What does this thing need to do before its unusual nature becomes evident to you? Fly the flag of Dr. No? Transform into a casino discotheque? Download Metallica from Napster? What? Because it obviously does more than "detect ballistic missile launches."

Oh come come! Civilian contractors are common place in the military these days. Be it logistics, r&d, boots on ground ( merceneries), security, etc etc. The reason it has civilians on it is because they know how it works. Much easier and cheaper to use the people who designed and builf it than re-train military personel.

My younger brother used to write software for military flight simulators. He went to airbases in Europe to install and run it on the hardware. He was and still is a civilian, a signatory to the official secrets act. It isn't a conspiracy, simply pragmatism. But you knew that really, so the Dr No comment is idiotic.

[ksm32]

Pop it with a big pin. I bet it blows around and makes big fart sounds all over the ocean surface.

[Jackstar]

http://youtu.be/fgeiW15trCY

http://youtu.be/Z-qaVat4PuQ

[Stellar]

I wasn't aware there was a quota on how often bullshit can be refuted?




You're right, entirely unrelated. And irrelevant. It's how the military works. Junior officers know what they see, but the higher ranking ones (in the 1940's) don't want to believe it and frequently disregarded information because their vanity prevented them to be the ones to shout that the sky was falling in. Instead of them falling on their sword because they might be wrong, it's easier to let a lower rank get the flack.

But back the SBX, just how does it generate the power to do as you suggest it does? I mean, to me, Joe down the road and even dead people, it looks just like a radar dome on top (usually made from Fibre glass)..So it emits radar signals...

Your ball. In your own words.

And yes SBX-1 raised the bar of BS, because satellites can detect missile launches.
http://www.space.com/20309-military-launches-missile-defense-satellite.html

The SBX-1 power capabilities are enough for a phased array of the latest technology. The SBX-1 is 350 times smaller than HAARP.  According to some sources the SBX-1 can utilize up to and over 1 mega-watts of power.  Because over time and due to Moore's law technology becomes exponentially smaller and more powerful every 2 years, I believe the capabilities out do HAARP.  Also due to a tilt mechanism I believe the Azimuth of the SBX-1 can be extended in any direction within so many degrees.  Here are some photos.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sea-based_X-band_Radar

4.6581e-32 watts of power would create the frequency of 70.3 Hertz at 1 seconds which is the electrical resonate frequency of igneous rock within the lithosphere.
http://www.rapidtables.com/calc/electric/Watt_to_Joule_Calculator.htm

http://www.1728.org/freqwave.htm

First off the Facts about Cell Phones size than a Picture of the SBX-1 slightly tilted:







http://books.google.com/books?id=TcaBiy9cO9YC&pg=PA205&lpg=PA205&dq=resonant+frequency+of+igneous+rocks+70.3+Hertz&source=bl&ots=HECuWDMQD4&sig=Gt3rjmMpfD6lUUF_2Qx04l0oq5E&hl=en&sa=X&ei=u9WAU6KGJovGoAT-hoDQCA&ved=0CDMQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=resonant%20frequency%20of%20igneous%20rocks%2070.3%20Hertz&f=false

[wr250]

4.6581e-32 watts of power would create the frequency of 70.3 Hertz at 1 seconds which is the electrical resonate frequency of igneous rock within the lithosphere.

frequency has nothing to do with watts. EX: household power is rated at 60HZ at 120/220V . on a 20A breaker thats a max of 7200W.
V x A=W
EX: im broadcasting on a microfm transmitter on radio fequency 87.7Mhz at 500 milliwatts.

please explain the electo-magnetic theory behind your statement.

[Yorkshire pud]

frequency has nothing to do with watts. EX: household power is rated at 60HZ at 120/220V . on a 20A breaker thats a max of 7200W.
V x A=W
EX: im broadcasting on a microfm transmitter on radio fequency 87.7Mhz at 500 milliwatts.

please explain the electo-magnetic theory behind your statement.

Oh for goodness sake!!! Since when has Stellar used facts and reality to bolster the bullshit he's cut and pasted off a CT website? You know he couldn't tell you what current, volts, and watts  have in realtion to each other or what  frequency is, and why it has nothing to do with the first three, any more than he knows what Neutron flux is. He just types and pastes bollox.

I have two transmitters...both battery powered. One uses a 7.4V nominal voltage 18mh battery and provides power to a board that supplies a RF signal at nominally 35Mhz. (range about two miles tops)

Another transmitter that uses a battery of 5.5 V 6mh that provides power to board supplying an RF signal at 2.4 Ghz... range about 3.5 miles tops.

Both can do that for hours until the batteries run flat...

so when he says: 4.6581e-32 watts of power would create the frequency of 70.3 Hertz, I have to ask, why does he need so much power? I can run many many more times higher frequencies with far far less power. ( I can't wait for this!)

When he types :

According to some sources the SBX-1 can utilize up to and over 1 mega-watts of power.  Because over time and due to Moore's law technology becomes exponentially smaller and more powerful every 2 years, I believe

...you know he's grasping at straws.

[Jackstar]

please explain the electo-magnetic theory behind your statement.

Et... voilà.

[Yorkshire pud]

Et... voilà.

Not really, he meant this:

frequency has nothing to do with watts. .

He's right, it doesn't. But Stellar implied it does with this:

4.6581e-32 watts of power would create the frequency of 70.3 Hertz at 1 seconds

...and about 63 Hertz off what Tesla was saying...

[Stellar]

frequency has nothing to do with watts. EX: household power is rated at 60HZ at 120/220V . on a 20A breaker thats a max of 7200W.
V x A=W
EX: im broadcasting on a microfm transmitter on radio fequency 87.7Mhz at 500 milliwatts.

please explain the electo-magnetic theory behind your statement.

Wow check this out 5.8111009e-26 Joules gives you 87.701Mhz. So Joules will tell you the frequency and in my frame of references in the prior thread was 1 second.  Yet Joules can be converted to watts.

http://www.1728.org/freqwave.htm

[Stellar]

Not really, he meant this:

He's right, it doesn't. But Stellar implied it does with this:


...and about 63 Hertz off what Tesla was saying...

Do to my rigorous study efforts I'm perhaps wrong about watts yet they do convert to joules.
According to the frequency site 4.6581e-32 should equal 70.3 Hz.
http://www.1728.org/freqwave.htm

[Yorkshire pud]

Do to my rigorous study efforts I'm perhaps wrong about watts yet they do convert to joules.
According to the frequency site 4.6581e-32 should equal 70.3 Hz.
http://www.1728.org/freqwave.htm

Watts and joules are units of power and energy respectively you moron. Frequency has fuck all to do with either.

[Stellar]

Oh for goodness sake!!! Since when has Stellar used facts and reality to bolster the bullshit he's cut and pasted off a CT website? You know he couldn't tell you what current, volts, and watts  have in realtion to each other or what  frequency is, and why it has nothing to do with the first three, any more than he knows what Neutron flux is. He just types and pastes bollox.

I have two transmitters...both battery powered. One uses a 7.4V nominal voltage 18mh battery and provides power to a board that supplies a RF signal at nominally 35Mhz. (range about two miles tops)

Another transmitter that uses a battery of 5.5 V 6mh that provides power to board supplying an RF signal at 2.4 Ghz... range about 3.5 miles tops.

Both can do that for hours until the batteries run flat...

so when he says: 4.6581e-32 watts of power would create the frequency of 70.3 Hertz, I have to ask, why does he need so much power? I can run many many more times higher frequencies with far far less power. ( I can't wait for this!)

When he types :

...you know he's grasping at straws.

I will make it very simple for you Yorkshire (Volts push the amps and watts is the power consumed).

Pud is that is too complicated, than here is an image for you which I hope enlightens you.

[Jackstar]

Wardenclyff Tower:




One of 160 NEXRAD towers spread across the continental United States from Hell to breakfast:




Apologists, assemble! Do You People think these things get built by accident? Let me hear you dismiss these images--can you do it in iambic pentameter?

[Stellar]

Watts and joules are units of power and energy respectively you moron. Frequency has fuck all to do with either.

Sorry my semantics is off today yet according to this site you can convert joules to a frequency.

http://www.1728.org/freqwave.htm

[wr250]

I will make it very simple for you Yorkshire (Volts push the amps and watts is the power consumed).

yes i said that

Pud is that is too complicated, than here is an image for you which I hope enlightens you.

and where does frequency come in?

[Stellar]

Wardenclyff Tower:




One of 160 NEXRAD towers spread across the continental United States from Hell to breakfast:




Apologists, assemble! Do You People think these things get built by accident? Let me hear you dismiss these images--can you do it in iambic pentameter?

MiNd CoNTroL!

[Yorkshire pud]

I will make it very simple for you Yorkshire (Volts push the amps and watts is the power consumed).

Pud is that is too complicated, than here is an image for you which I hope enlightens you.

I'm very well aware of what Watts and Volts and Amps do. But how does it tie into frequency? Moron.

[Yorkshire pud]

Sorry my semantics is off today yet according to this site you can convert joules to a frequency.

http://www.1728.org/freqwave.htm

Instead of pasting irrelevant links, what about you telling us in your own words how frequency is related directly to Volts, Amps and Watts.,. ?