The General Musings of gnooryblows

[paladin1991]

YES I AM DEGENERATE, YOU DONT HAVE TO GLORIFY ME. I DONT ASK FOR IT. I DONT ASK FOR YOUR ACCEPTANCE. IM A DEVIANT. YOU SHOULD NOT BE MY FRIEND. I HAVE ALSO HAD HOMOSEXUAL EXPERIENCES

Homo experiences.  Was it in college in  the frat house?  Then it's only a prank, or initiation or hazing.  No actual homo.  Unless, of course, you now suck cock by choice.

[paladin1991]

NO THE POOP EXPERIENCE WAS WITH A WOMAN, HOMOSEXUAL EXPERIENCES WERE WITH MEN BUT I NEVER PUT PENIS IN MY ASS

That's because screaming phaggots put their cocks in your ass.  You just lie there, like a piss poor fuck.

[gnooryblows]

seriously is there anything more gross than this? i get cringy and nauseous if i ever have to speak to these monsters. something deep down bothers me about it, like the same way you feel when you see spiders or snakes.

[gnooryblows]

this is how it's supposed to look

[gnooryblows]

srsly how can you even punch a woman like that in the face? you would mess her up too badly without a good strong jawline to absorb the blow!

[gnooryblows]

srsly good question

[gnooryblows]

this is why you don't fuck ugly people. you fuck ugly people, you make ugly babies. and if you yourself are ugly, ABSTAIN! just fuckin' masturbate bruh

[gnooryblows]

our society tells you "beauty is on the inside" "beautiful is on the inside" "don't be shallow!' "dont judge based on looks!" "fuck the ugly! they will love you forever!" no faggot, don't fuck the ugly, because then your kids will be ugly and you'll be damning these precious new human lives to pained existences in unhealthy, fragile bodies. that's how genetics work. fuck the good looking, the way your fucking instincts tell you to. don't get duped by jewish media trying to create a nation of slaves just healthy enough to work but too WEAK and FRAIL to ever rise up and rebel!

[gnooryblows]

"wah wah wah people who just care about looks are superficial"

wrong bitch! people who care about careers, money, clothing, cars, social status and what sort of FUCKING MUSIC you like to listen to are superficial!

people who care about looks are caring about YOUR FUCKING DNA! LITERALLY THE LEAST SUPERFICIAL THING ON THE PLANET! LITERALLY THE DEEPEST AND MOST SIGNIFICANT PART OF YOU THAT DEFINES EVERYTHING ABOUT YOU! LITERALLY THE PART OF YOU THAT RUNS IN YOUR BLOOD!

just another example of how society uses tricks of language and gaslighting to try to turn around EVERY FUCKING THING. if it's black they call it white. if it's up they call it down!

[gnooryblows]

wherein little black babies were adopted by high income households and given every opportunity to succeed. when their IQ was tested, they still lagged behind the white babies reared in the same environment. this study once and for all demolished the long held left-wing / academia / politically correct mantra that all racial differences between white and black IQ was actually due to "socioeconomic differences" aka it was actually the white mans fault that blacks were failing the tests.

amazingly, when given every opportunity, the gap between black and white children didn't just stay the same, it actually INCREASED by a couple of points (from roughly 20 points to roughly 22 points!)

there certainly can be no mistake. this is information that the mainstream media and even college academia would like to see buried. they try to gloss over these results  and studies at any chance they get! this is info that strikes right to the core of left-wing philosophy and everything wrong with it with regards to social issues! yes, there ARE differences between the races! (duh) yes, there are psychological and mental differences! (duh) yes, white people ARE smarter than blacks and mexicans! (duh).

you want to say "iq doesn't matter much!" fine. you would in fact be incorrect, but fine. all you need to know is this - IQ correlates STRONGLY with economic success later in life. so when we're examining the social situations we find ourselves in these days, and we examine black failure, we can no longer simply point the finger at The White Man and blame him for all of The Black Man's shortcomings when we, in fact, have mounds and mounds of empirical studies and proofs that they are in fact simply mentally deficient and not as well equipped to succeed in todays world as the rest of us!

https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/a2d7/85edd7aa61b7ba51355053cc61d8b924fe35.pdf

DEAR BLACK AMERICA! YOU CANT BLAME THE WHITE MAN ANYMORE! ITS YOUR OWN FAULT! NOBODY ELSES!

[gnooryblows]

"wah wah wah wah muh jim crow laws!" - guess what? jim crow laws weren't that bad. they only meaningfully existed in a handful of states and when they did the law was equally applied to both groups. also in geographic regions (such as new england) where jim crow laws were actually OUTLAWED as far back as the mid 1800s, blacks have fared no better socially!

black americans in the 20th century had a comparatively easy road compared to other groups. in russia, 20 million people were intentionally starved to death during the holodomor. in europe, the continent was decimated by 2 world wars. 80 million casualties ensued, many women, children, civilians. japan had 2 nuclear bombs dropped on them! china had maos murderous regime! japanese americans were put in internment camps! there was no such thing as "the holocaust", but 20 million jews were imprisoned in labor camps for a number of years. blacks only had to a separate school and drink from a different god damn water fountain.

all of these other groups bounced back, they were able to recover. why weren't blacks? they had the easiest road of them all! history coddled the african american, and he has benefited from 50 years of social programs designed in his favor! so why has he not succeeded? the answer is simple, he is less intelligent than the others!

[gnooryblows]

70 is legally retarded just so everyone knows

[mikuthing01]

habeeb it

[gnooryblows]

note that one of the greatest criticisms of the MTRAS is that "early adopted black children do so much better and nearly as good as white children". this is a broken argument that is often advanced as a supposed "debunking" of this study, but doesn't hold up to any scrutiny.

the category of "early adopted" is given exclusively for black babies in the study. there is no category of "early adopted" for white babies, to cross check this info with, so we only have the mean to work with. however, 2 things can be noted 1) the mean score of white babies is still greater than the mean score of the early adopted black babies and 2) it's nothing more than extreme common sense to presume that by isolating the most favorable conditions in white babies that were adopted, we will see even higher scores and an even greater disparity in the scores.

so for the purposes of science and empirical study, the only numbers that mean anything at all are the numbers we can compare equally, and in this case there's no specific factor or reason to suggest that the total score of the black children and white children would ever be skewered or different in any way.

(essentially, this argument is people doing mental gymnastics, and then trying to use big words and sound smart to fool people who aren't familiar with how research studies. intentionally talking over the readers head, essentially)

[Crunch Hardtack]

I am in love with you. I'm a dude though so we could wrap ourselves in saran wrap first. It wouldn't be gay then.

[gnooryblows]

and the second most commonplace argument is that in utero conditions were likely the cause for the disparity, and of course, this is very much along the same vein of thinking as the first argument.

there's no reason to suggest that in utero conditions would be especially bad for black babies. one could suggest that blacks are more prone to socioeconomic strife, and they would be correct in that regard, but not when crosschecked against a subset of the white population that is putting their children up for adoption (parents of adopted children are almost always living in sub-optimal economic conditions, therefore creating equally bad in utero conditions for both groups)

[gnooryblows]

the left wing establishment and politically correct academia has done everything that they can to try to write off these irrefutable results. they deny and deny the validity of this study with intellectually dishonest arguments that they themselves must patently know are bunk. this information represents one of the greatest existential threats to liberal thought on social issues. this truth is their greatest fear. this truth is their great boogeyman

[Lilith]

 

[gnooryblows]

blacks truly are the least desirable

[gnooryblows]

here's the basically the same information from okcupid

https://theblog.okcupid.com/race-and-attraction-2009-2014-107dcbb4f060

[gnooryblows]

and here's some explanation as to how this data was compiled - > https://qz.com/149342/the-uncomfortable-racial-preferences-revealed-by-online-dating/

[Yorkshire pud]

I'm a cunt.

[damon]

Gnooryblows is still around because he gives MV the best blowjobs.

[gnooryblows]

Gnooryblows is still around because he gives MV the best blowjobs.

i do, these lips are magic

[gnooryblows]

maybe MV realizes that a forum dedicated to a radio show that mostly went off the air 17 years ago, and totally went off the year a decade ago is only a dying shadow, and wants to allow it opened up for discussion about pertinent topics that are out there today so that it might one day emulate the success of other website that allow such discourse (eg 4chans /pol/) in the age of Trump and the anti-political-correctness movement.

maybe he realizes that most of you who whine about me are old men who will be dead eventually and he still wants to make a few bucks off his website in the future.

of course, all of this is just speculative because i have no idea what goes on his head, but it's certainly what i'd be thinking if i were in his position.

[gnooryblows]

i've posted this before but.........face the fact that you stuck up oldfags are dinosaurs - >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generation_Z#Political_views

[gnooryblows]

i've posted this before but.........face the fact that you stuck up oldfags are dinosaurs - >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generation_Z#Political_views

it's always been an absolute given that younger generations will vote liberal. they might still be more liberal than not liberal, but the trend in the opposite direction, despite all of the mass media messages thrown at them, is fucking telling

[gnooryblows]

culture changed on november 8th 2016. no longer were the liberals this unstoppable winning force that commanded everyones respect in society. all of the sudden there was "another choice". a fun choice. a rebellious choice. a choice that didn't rely on shouting down and no platforming their opponents. a choice that addressed real realities and issues that affected younger people too (their future in a multiracial USA). things have changed in a big way, sorry. you think any fucking 14 year old is really going to think hillary clinton is cooler than donald trump? if they're black, maybe. if they're hispanic, maybe. the united states is largely not a white nation anymore. but young white children everywhere today are finally racially aware. you can all whine and bitch and moan about me until you're blue in the face, i'm only the beginning of your troubles. i'm only the harbinger of things to come. i'm only the canary in the coalmine. i'm only a preview of the future

[gnooryblows]

why ban a the views of a significant contingency of the youth population? why ban that are now popular and widespread just because "old people and millennials (who are now becoming officially old themselves) think they're inappropriate"? even among young people today it's popular to defend hitler and deny the holocaust. even if they don't know the facts, they like it just because it TRIGGERS you oversensitive assholes

i knew things had changed irrevocably when i was in the mall and walked passed a spencer gifts that had wholly unironic "trump" shirts on display at the front of the store

[gnooryblows]

and ANOTHER thing! big platforms like twitter and facebook can get away with it because there's no other choice, but when people censor conservative views there's something to consider - > you're essentially "censoring" your largest demographic - > the white male.

hell, even 1/5th of black men voted for Trump in the recent election, along with a REALLY large portion (almost half maybe?) of the male hispanic population!

whether you like it or not, Trump ran on a platform of identity politics for white people. although i fully believe that he himself is not much of an identitarian, that was what he came to symbolize and that was why white voters, for the first time in our nations history, were polarized to a particular candidate.

so when you censor those views, you're just leaving room on your website for blacks (who are largely too poor for internet and illiterate), women (who are actually out doing better things, rather than sitting around on their computer all day wallowing in social isolation the way men do) and the white male cuck demographic (which is exceedingly small, and even so most of them are actually out hanging with their "platonic female friends" and listening to "what assholes their boyfriends are"). so you know, good luck with that!