This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: teknoslag on May 25, 2018, 06:42:44 PM
From the facts of the case. What piece of information did Ted Bundy give that led to the identification and arrest of Ridgway? None.
Ridgway was arrested for solicitation in 1982. He was ID'd as a suspect in 1983 when the boyfriend of a victim, who witnessed her abduction, followed the truck his girlfriend was picked up in to the owner's home. He led police to the house, who questioned the owner. The owner was Gary Ridgway. When detectives cross referenced that incident with Ridgway's earlier arrest, he became a suspect. He was cleared by a polygraph test, though Detective Reichert maintained at the time that he didn't trust the test results, which turned out to be a smart move on his part. It was later determined through quality control protocols that the FBI developed afterwards that Ridgway had actually failed his polygraph. His DNA was taken and kept on file until 2001, when technology had advanced far enough to obtain a match.
Nowhere in there was anything Bundy said helpful, nor was it utilized to capture the Green River Killer.
"But for me, the Bundy interviews turned out to be less about information and more about inspiration. Ted Bundy certainly knew everything about his own exploits as a serial killer, and he had studied other monsters the way an athelete studies his competitors. But in the end, he had used us to get some relief from the prison routine and to make himself feel important. He was also trying to delay his own execution by demonstrating that he had some value to society that would be lost upon his death. I didn't buy any of that." - Dave Reichert, Chasing the Devil, pg. 124 - 143
Reichert has been adamant from the moment Ridgway was arrested (20 years after Bundy supposedly helped catch him) that Ted played absolutely no role in his ID or his capture, as have others who worked tirelessly on the case for decades.
Quote from: username on May 12, 2018, 05:23:19 PM
Thank you WC.
Quote from: Catsmile on May 12, 2018, 05:04:05 PM
# It also assumes "someone" had the night @ one point
# You know the one whining about bleeding subscribers, and ridding "The Nightâ,,¢" to the bitter end.
Quote from: Sean92008 on May 05, 2018, 11:46:16 AMPhone sex Heather did phone sex?
True, and she hasn't done anything to quell that mentality.
That could backfire on her in terms of financial losses to KR. Even if she doesn't have any money to go after, he could hex future earnings depending on where the ruling takes place.
If that were to happen. she'll be back to phone sex work at the tranny fetish line 976-SNIP.
Quote from: Cybernaut on May 03, 2018, 03:49:58 PM
She knew it was coming. The writing was on the wall regarding her inability to build a following.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5DIeKQOOlvI
Quote from: GravitySucks on April 28, 2018, 08:59:43 PMMaybe it's over. I heard a rumor that Amy Martin is going to be Heather's replacement. I guess we'll wait to see if that's true. I'm glad Keith is doing the show tonight.
Not that I have seen here.
Quote from: bellNwhistle on April 28, 2018, 06:38:35 PM
Super bummed I can’t stay up late enough to listen.
Quote from: DanTSX on April 25, 2018, 08:46:45 PM
Of course he does. He was wife swapping with Art
Ok got it. Thank you!
Art thought very highly of Whitley wife Ann. Maybe that why
Hit the quote button in the upper right corner of the post you wish to quote..
Quote from: Sean92008 on April 25, 2018, 08:51:10 PMNo not by Ramona but same place
I've asked too... I bet Strieber knows...
Quote from: ge30542 on April 25, 2018, 08:41:20 PM
Is it possible that Keith is trying to honor Art's wish that Heather host? Just wondering out loud.
Quote from: Kolchak
link=topic=9159.msg1185370#msg1185370 date=1524693859
She's the heavy you have to get through before defeating the final boss.