BellGab/bellchan Archive

Michael, your answer didn't at all address Mahigitam's recent article.  Ok, he forgot he was told about his daughter's accident.  But which contact report did he fabricate then, the one where he was supposedly fortold about his daughters accident, or the one where he was supposedly told that his daughters accident couldn't be predicted?

Jesus christ you are shameless.    And to go on and on about anonymity... as if lying for profit is somehow morally superior to calling out bullshit anonymously.  What a joke.  I'm glad to see many folks are departing FIGU, and wising up to your BS.

QuoteFor those people who are actually familiar with the Meier material and with the dynamics of his life and how he has long handled advance knowledge of certain events, etc., it’s really quite simple.

I recall that some years ago Meier told me that about a year before he would lose his arm, he saw a man with only one arm at a beach in Greece, or India, I forget exactly which one. It reminded him that he would lose his arm soon and so, as was/is often the case with certain unpleasant things that are going to happen and can’t be altered by him, he pushed it far back in his mind.

I think that this is probably exactly such a situation, especially because Meier had indeed repeatedly warned his daughter about her own driving habits, though it was another person’s irresponsibility that caused the accident.

Thanks for that.  Just one follow-up.  So, perhaps it is understandable that he forgot such monumental information about his daughter (?), but that doesn't explain the later conversation with Ptaah.  There is still a blatant contradiction.  He backdated the alleged prediction, forgetting that he had already published in the meantime that that event couldn't be predicted... your response, unfortunately (but unsurprisingly), does not at all account for this smoking gun... surely you see that?

I've heard you say repeatedly that you are happy to answer questions.  So what is your response to Mahigitam's recent article about Meier first stating his daughters accident couldn't be predicted and then later saying it was foreseen?  Is this not proof Meier just makes up the contact reports as he goes along?  What is your alternative explanation for this?

"The media doesn't want you to see it..."  Jesus.   All I was hearing from liberal outlets last couple weeks was about Trumps climate change-denying appointment to EPA.   Can you publish anything not breathtakingly stupid?  And why are you getting your climate change info from some cultist "Bob Wiegand"  when you can reference 97% of climate scientists?  Whatever.  I don't care.

But I've heard you say repeatedly that you are happy to answer questions.  So what is your response to Mahigatam's recent article about Meier first stating his daughters accident couldn't be predicted and then later saying it was foreseen?  Is this not proof Meier just makes up the contact reports?  Of course it is (as are the dozens of other smoking guns)...unless you have a response??  What is your explanation for this Mr. Meier Representative??

QuoteWho is Billy Myers again?

He is that guy who exploits his daughter's tragic accident to further his con:

http://www.billymeieruforesearch.com/miscellaneous/epic-of-gilgamesha-predicting-the-future-but-forgetting-the-past/

Michael any response to this contradiction?  Will Smith is up to no good again? 

QuoteThe New Translation of the Talmud Jmmanuel Is Here!

http://theyflyblog.com/?p=4214

The true teaching of the man falsely known as "Jesus Christ"

Is this a heavily homophobic edition or a PC version?  Both have their charms, of course. I'm just curious.

Quotejust plow forward with more links to more bullshit.  don't answer any questions or address any challenges.  coward.

Bingo.

Speaking of the worst anyone can come up with, are you going to ever address this?:

"Homosexual men are degenerates who blaspheme life and Creation."  1987
"Homosexual men are not degenerates who do not blaspheme life and Creation." 2011

"The dung heap stinks less than whores, male-whores and homosexuals." 1987
"The dung heap stinks less than whores, male-whores and criminals."  2011

Surely, you will stop saying Meier never backdates?

PS - "Homosexual men are degenerates who blaspheme life and Creation."  1987
"Homosexual men are not degenerates who do not blaspheme life and Creation." 2011

"The dung heap stinks less than whores, male-whores and homosexuals." 1987
"The dung heap stinks less than whores, male-whores and criminals."  2011

#BillyIsNotHomophobic  #BillyNeverBackdates

QuotePessimism May Be Bad for Your Heart

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/16/well/mind/pessimism-may-be-bad-for-your-heart.html?_r=0

Says it all...

A strange message coming from literally the greatest fear mongerer I've ever read.

QuoteRevue: I thought you both (Micheal and Curtiss) approached it with the reasonable assumption he'd pause to breath before another five minute monologue of incredible tedium.

It became apparent that the self absorbed narcissist, like all of the same, had a well trod path of spilling out the same lines of none provable or proven anecdotes, until the initial question asked of him, was lost in the noise.

He doesn't answer a straight question without either ignoring it completely, or being so vague and obviously uncomfortable with it, he has to return to his safe spot of attempting to obfuscate with more irrelevant bullshit.

The questions put to him about the appropriateness of not only engaging in a protracted skype correspondence with a sixteen year old girl, but sending her a (in his words) "childlike" love song(!), were met not only with breathtaking arrogance, but an attempt to deflect the responsibility to the girl and her mother. He follows the norm of all sexual preditors; its never their fault. They're just doing what is natural, and have in some way been 'trapped' into being the low life perverts such as Horn.

Such as him (and Wendell Stevens before him, and likely Meier), are dangerous. They cajole, manipulate and abuse the vulnerable and naive.

Frankly he should be  investigated by the authorities for his behaviour towards women (very young ones at that); that alone makes his bullshit about aliens irrelevant.

Whoa!  He got called out on the 16 yr old stuff?!  I hope I can listen in an archive somewhere. 

Anyway, but he's not anonymous, so you are the true scum.

QuoteFor the weepy, denial dwelling snowflakes here...who cower in fearful anonymity:

Excerpts from the 465th official contact conversation
from May 7, 2008

Billy: However, do you have still something else about unusual predictions? And what interests me, relates to the presidential primary in the USA; who will ultimately win the race, Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton, who in my opinion extremely craves for power? Do you have something yet to say regarding this?

Ptaah: 61. Yes.

62. Barack Obama will win the Democrat primary.

63. And what you say regarding Hillary Clinton corresponds to the truth.She is an extremely power-craving woman, who up to the end does not give up, but nevertheless will suffer a defeat.

64. If she would actually come to power, then the USA and many countries of Earth would be heading for a really unpleasant future.

65. However, humanity can consider itself fortunate, that power is not laid in the hands of this woman.

What what?  What is the point of this?  Meier "predicting" the Democratic primary in 2008 after they have finished, is somehow now evidence that he predicted Trumps's victory 8 years later?  This is what you are resorting to now, huh?

Well, I think this one does a pretty good job of debunking itself.  Thank you come again.

PS - That shoe though...man! uncanny!  How does it feel that your boss consistently gets out prophecized by footwear? 

PPS - So no comment on the "spiritual teaching" changing with public opinion?  And still no word from Meier on why he plagiarized every sentence from James Allen's book?  As much as I enjoy your Meier updates, can I get a relevant one for once?

QuoteJust a couple examples serving as evidence of Meier's flip-flop on homosexuality. Following comparison verses are from the 1987 ed. and 2011 ed. of his book OM, Canon 32:
(http://billybooks.org/book/german/om.php?lang=en)

1575. Homosexual men are degenerates who blaspheme life and Creation.
1575. Homosexual men are not degenerates who do not blaspheme life and Creation.

1743. The dung heap stinks less than whores, male-whores and homosexuals.
1743. The dung heap stinks less than whores, male-whores and criminals.

Horn.  You've repeatedly claimed Meier doesn't backdate.  Yet, he clearly attempted to backdate his entire teaching on homosexuality.  The brazenness of the lying is at Trumpian levels.

And Mahesh got banned from FIGU forum because of his "slander" calling Meier a homophobe!   Yes, it is so slanderous that he would describe this as homophobic:  "The dung heap stinks less than whores, male-whores and homosexuals."

No comments, really?  Lame, but unsurprising. 

Gosh, now I am just dying to know -- you really think Meier is legit??   What do the others think here -- is Horn a fraud through and through or profoundly delusional? 

QuoteUnless of course its proclaimed by the shoe.

If the shoe fits...

Horny Horn.  Regarding Mahigtam's link, are you going to explain to us why Meier changes his teachings with public opinion (and then denies and tries to cover up that he changed position)?  Well, since his role as universal savior isn't working out, perhaps he would make a good politician.  Lie, insult, rinse, repeat.  And you two are match made in heaven.  Meier/Horn for Mayor/Secretary to the Mayor,  Hinter-Hinterschmidruti Switzerland 2016!

QuoteJust a couple examples serving as evidence of Meier's flip-flop on homosexuality. Following comparison verses are from the 1987 ed. and 2011 ed. of his book OM, Canon 32:
(http://billybooks.org/book/german/om.php?lang=en)

1575. Homosexual men are degenerates who blaspheme life and Creation.
1575. Homosexual men are not degenerates who do not blaspheme life and Creation.

1743. The dung heap stinks less than whores, male-whores and homosexuals.
1743. The dung heap stinks less than whores, male-whores and criminals.

Could definitely be typos.  You cannot prove otherwise.  Indeed, we already established here recently that Meier is the most unlucky typist in the history of the universe.   

You got some nerve questioning a man you've never met.  Just because he formerly unambiguously espoused vile homophobic teachings in a series of unambiguous  typos and has now corrected said typos, does not mean that he "flip-flopped."  Jeez.  Some people.  Give him the benefit of the doubt once and a while -- haven't you heard that the case is scientifically proven?!? 

What are you going to tell us next -- that shoes cannot predict the future?  Open your mind for fucks sake.   

QuoteOnce again, anonyomous website cowards, hiding behind made up names are casting doubt on the words of the shoe without any proof that the transcripts were written after the events accurately predicted by the shoe. As for doubt because of its size, well its a UK size 9, which any shoemaker, or as we know them; cobbler is an approximation to a US size 10. The shoe has never been wrong.

There IS proof the transcripts were written after the events.  Worse still, prints of the infamous shoe have been found at numerous child rape crime scenes. 

QuoteFACT: Billy Meier Foretold the Italian Earthquakes After all, the fact that Italy lies on a major fault line is immaterial.

http://theyflyblog.com/?p=4148

An expanded lesson in impeccable prophetic accuracy and self-responsibility A simple case of stating the likelihood, due to the very well known incidence of earthquakes in Italy.

FIFY. Next week can you tell the world how Meier 'predicted' water is wet, concrete is hard and the Moon goes around the Earth?

Funny.

QuoteFACT: Billy Meier Foretold the Italian Earthquakes

http://theyflyblog.com/?p=4148

An expanded lesson in impeccable prophetic accuracy and self-responsibility

Lying clown.  See http://www.billymeieruforesearch.com/prophecies-predictions-probability-calculations/analysis-of-contact-reports-101-196/#Jupiter8217s_Great_Red_Spot_Ring_Amalthea_Io8217s_Volcanism_Plasma_Torus

What a shameless lying bastard.  You know I'm gonna call you out here, why do you continue to embarrass yourself?

I'm glad you brought up Iceman in this piece though.  What are the statistical probabilities that Meier would give the exact wrong age of the Iceman - the wrong age that was consistent with contemporary terrestrial estimates - when he first published on the Iceman?   That is, what are the odds that he would have a "typo" that was consistent with the wrong information in the media at the time he published?  What are the statistical probabilities that such, ahem...curious... typos can be found numerous times in the contact reports??  One in billions.  Mahesh has already demonstrated that Meier never has really predicted anything like you suggest, rather what his work on the contact reports shows is that Meier is a fraud or the most unlucky typist ever to type.  Either way, you are a shameless liar because you know this.

Quotetime traveling special agents planting false evidence...

...dressed in black.

Perhaps you are joking about this.  But I don't know... I do recall seeing a documentary about such things.  I think Will Smith was featured in it.  Shouldn't be so quick to dismiss Horn's explanations perhaps. 

QuoteIn all the excitement, I forgot to share this with you:

WikiLeaks: “The name alone scares me. theyfly.com”

http://theyflyblog.com/?p=4123

UFO warnings about dangerous US policies reached “global intelligence” company in 2006

So it looks like...we got it right.

Name kinda scares me too.  The headquarters of lying psychopath and his delusional, fearful, and hateful followers.  Yeah, even the name, "theyfly"...yes, all very creepy for sure.

Appears some ex-Figuians taking some revenge at Horn and Meier/Figu...

https://tpbclean.com/user/Ex-FIGU/

What???  Really?  Nothing?  After that cocksure initial response about the MUFON info, and then...nothing???  We don't need Mahesh to even post the photo, you are conceding backdating?  Weird.  What the hell did you think you would be able to collect the 100$ for?  I'm so confused.  Your sheer ineptitude is perplexing sometimes.

I mean, can't say I'm surprised, because it is 100% clear that Meier is a hoaxer and you a liar, but that big talk yesterday made me think you maybe had at least a little something up your sleeve... but no, just more distraction and misdirection huh, without conceding your mistake/lie.  What else is new...

BTW, it's not that I expect everything to be super tidy.  Its just I assume if you are going to boldly declare Meier prophetically predicted x, y, and z - and that this is proven "scientifically" or to the "legal standard of proof" etc - I assumed you would be able to show it.  Errr... seems pretty reasonable to me dontchya think?

Actually, I didn't really assume you'd be able to demonstrate it of course, because obviously I have looked into many of your lies, and not one of these claims for prophecy has checked out.  Again, I'm not demanding a perfectly flawless 26,000 pages, but if you are going to claim 200+ corroborations and cannot produce even one that is legit...well... then you're the definition of a conman and should probably adjust your rhetoric should you truly not be intending to be one.

Yes I am the "conspiratorial" one for thinking Meier backdates (after having just proved he backdates), and you are the sane and reality-based non-conspiratorial one who thinks the whole world is out to suppress his message (a message which contains claims that been debunked a gazillion times in this thread alone)...  ha.  gimme a fuckin break...You are a crack up, Horn!

Yes, yes, move along, change the subject, post link to another BS "corroboration" in the hopes that people forget that your prior BS claim was completely debunked and you were exposed as a liar yet again...(not that anyone here is being fooled by this nonsense of course).   

Ugh, I may be over this.  No fun arguing with a psychopath.  It's not very satisfying if every time you get caught in a lie/misstatement, instead of acknowledging and conceding and correcting the point, you just insult the person who successfully challenged you... (BTW, do you help run Trump's campaign per chance?)

PS - I just quickly looked into your ozone bit.  A glance through the ever-helpful BMUFOR website produced this: 

QuoteBilly Meier representative Michael Horn has published an article â€" Proof beyond a reasonable doubt â€" in which he presented the following news articles as evidence of Meier/ETs advanced scientific knowledge on the effects of nuclear explosions on ozone layer:

“Corroborated: November 29, 1988, published report from Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories announced this “new discovery”: ATOM BOMB TESTING TIED TO OZONE DEPLETION, 13 years after Meier had already published it..

Corroborated: Los Angeles Times, February 24, 1992: OZONE HOLE DAMAGES FOOD CHAIN, confirming the connection between the UV passing through the ozone hole and genetic mutations and damage to the food chain.”

However the following quotes from newspapers and a magazine from 1974 clearly shows that the negative effects of atom bombs/nuclear explosions on ozone layer and life was already known before Meier allegedly received information about it in 1975.

U.S. Official Warns Of Ozone Depletion From Nuclear War (New York Times, pg. 1, September 6, 1974)
(Original article issued by U.S. Arms Control and Disarmament Agency on which the above New York Times article is based on, can be accessed here)

“The potential depletion of the ozone layer by nuclear explosions is a new, accidental discovery that arms control officials believe adds an awesome element to the destructive effects of a nuclear war”

“… perhaps it would destroy critical links of the intricate food chain of plants and animals, and thus shatter the ecological structure that permits man and animals to remain alive on this planet.”

Pentagon Replies On Peril To Ozone (New York Times, pg. 7, October 17, 1974)

“The Defense Department estimates that an all-out nuclear war would significantly deplete the protective layer of ozone in the stratosphere but not to the point of endangering the continuance of life on earth.”

“… two University of California scientists (…) contend that there was a 4 percent depletion in the ozone layer as a result of 1961-62 explosions.”

Stratospheric Pollution: Multiple Threats to Earth’s Ozone (Science, pg. 335-338, v.186, no. 4161, October 25, 1974)

“Supersonic transports, aerosol sprays, and nuclear weapons (…) are all potential sources of catalytic agents that penetrate the earth’s stratosphere and decompose the ozone that shields living things from the worst of the sun’s ultraviolet radiation (…) High intensities of this ultraviolet radiation are harmful to nearly all forms of life (…) An increased incidence of mutation has been observed in certain [plants] (…) There are also some indications that increased radiation will interfere with the growth of plankton in the ocean (…) The controversial evidence is thus that the 1961-1962 bomb tests resulted in a moderate, transient reduction of ozone.”

Now I see why you always put "new discovery" in quotes, it's because you simply deem them "new discoveries" if it suits your dishonest purpose.   Ok, I guess I can be more charitable here though, instead of conscious lies, I'll assume you were yet again just mistaken regarding the newness of the thing.  Although, on the other hand, given you have never once went back and corrected even one of the countless of your erroneous statements, maybe you don't deserve the benefit of the doubt here...

I do have some further questions, thank you sir.

First, I don't understand why the Feb. 3 contact is relevant?

Second, all you have done is simply repeated your assertion, i.e., that Meier named MUFON back in 50's, but you have not brought any further evidence to the table.  Yes, I am aware that the contact report SAYS 1956 on it, but I am telling you there is no evidence it was distributed then.  And further, the word "MUFON" wasn't in the earliest verifiable publications of this contact, but not until the 2002 edition.  That is, this bit was inserted only in later editions and thus effectively "backdated", falsely giving a prophetic appearance.

So the question is, do you have a copyrighted item that has the word "MUFON" in it sometime before that organization was created...? This is, after all, what you have been purporting or implying, yes? 

Unlike you apparently, Mahesh actually does have the old books, so maybe he can double check what he reported at his website, and then perhaps post a photo to show that the word MUFON is indeed missing.  And, if it is missing in the early editions, but found only in the later, then you will concede this is "backdating", yes?  This is what we have been meaning by the term, I thought?   (And if he does produce this, then perhaps you are the one in need of apologizing to him for calling him a liar?)

I have questions for other parts of your post, but one thing at a time...

No, the $100 not on the table.  I made that offer because I was confident you lied about writing article about '50's letters because I had asked you to produce it a dozen times to no avail.

Here, I am not quite so confident, especially considering  your response.  But, I would be really intrigued if you could demonstrate Meier really did speak of MUFON back before it's existence.  Perhaps you would begin to convince me of authenticity and I would owe you some big apologies potentially...after all, if you got the goods here, this would indeed be a really impressive feat on Meier's part.  A head scratcher for sure.

But, frankly, my hopes are not high, because this would mean BMUFOR was lying or committed a big error but it seems to be the case that those blunders usually only come from your end.  But, no, no money this time for aforementioned reason.  But I assume you don't promote Meier for the money, but because you think it is a good and worthy cause.  So, please, do share. 

Hoax of the century?  How many followers does Billy Meier have?  Receive my due glory?  Here is what would happen if I, Mr. MH is a Liar, proudly and loudly announced to the world that 'I have debunked the Meier case!' :

Quote... crickets...

...crickets...

From the crowd: "Dude, that thing was debunked a long time ago."

Me:  "Oh yeah, good point.  Never mind, sorry to bother you."

That would be the extent of my due glory.   What is new is how comprehensively Meier has been debunked, and how numerous your exposed lies.

Why do you keep changing the subject?   You are the one that keeps coming posting links to your word vomit.  When I mop it all up, you get mad at me for not wearing a name tag?

If you want to slice and dice my claims, go ahead, nothing is stopping you.  Here, hows about this, we'll leave your wildly contradictory and (purposefully?) misleading black hole post for now, and just slice and dice this one for me por favor:

In 1958, Meier was supposedly warned about one of his coming enemies, the "German central for ufological works."  This contact was first published in 1978.

However, in the same verse of the same contact in the 2002 edition of the publication, this enemy was named as "MUFON." 
This is discussed here: http://www.billymeieruforesearch.com/prophecies-predictions-probability-calculations/analysis-of-contact-reports-1-100/#Arab-Israeli_Conflict_MUFON

Now, I know you like to to declare this as one of your "corroborations" -- Meier named MUFON before it existed!   But, you see, he did no such thing, MUFON is only mentioned in 2002.  So, are you lying when you claim this as a corroboration, or did you just not know about this discrepancy?  You just assumed that key word, "MUFON," was in the earlier texts and didn't bother to check before making an ass of yourself?

In either case, now that you definitely know, you will take this off your list of corroborations right?  (No, you won't, because if that was the protocol there would be no more list).  You will at least concede that this is evidence of backdating right?  Well, it's not even just "evidence" of it, it is a full fledged example of backdating.  And that is just one of many.  I could keep giving you more, there are apparently dozens and dozens at the website linked above.

So now, you will at least quit saying there is no evidence for backdating right?   Or are you going to slice and dice this claim for me somehow where you come out as honest and Meier comes out not as a backdater?

So why do you lie about when things were published?  Whether you personally want to believe Meier had those conversations on those dates, and whether you think you read them way back when... well, that is a heckuva lot different than him actually publishing them on those dates as you continually try to pass it off as. 

If the case is true, why do continually misrepresent the evidence?  And are you going to correct your recent black hole article now that you know it is all complete nonsense?  Of course you will not.  Because, despite how breathtakingly stupid and wholly misleading that article is, your followers somehow accept it as a "corroboration" because you framed it as such.  Why let truth and accuracy get in the way of a good "corroboration" eh, Michael?  (Ugh, again despite how obviously, embarrassingly erroneous that entire blog post is... god, these figuians...man, really bottom of the barrel intellects you got over there Mikey).

QuotePeople are free to think whatever they want but wild claims that Meier was backdating information - that I already read in the 1980s! - is absurd.

You disgust me.  I could demonstrate to you numerous instances of backdating.  And you know this.  I think we have already went over a few in this thread.  Yet you lie lie lie.  Really despicable stuff Michael.  Who do you think you are fooling???  No one here obviously.  No backdating...ha, what a joke.  Do you want me to provide again a handful of these examples?  No, you don't, and you'll just lie about it somehow anyway even though the proof will be staring you in the face.  Instead, I'll just post this info from the link I posted previously.  Pretty humorous, and spot-on.

QuoteA special team of neuroscientists, hurried from across the world to probe Michael Horn's (MH) imploding brain, made a stunning discovery -  the presence of a wandering black hole. They reported that many of the Michael's personality traits (rather disorders), exhibited both in online and real world, can be traced back to this malady. Some of these traits include:

Chronic fact deficiency
Truth-Intolerant
Acquired logic deficiency syndrome
Compulsive lying disorder
Histrionic personality disorder
Narcissistic personality disorder
Adult-bully syndrome
Little-man syndrome
Post-debunking denial disorder
Allergic to fact-checking
Aversion to skepticism
Stage 4 Self-deception
Messiah complex
Galileo Complex
Intellectile dysfunction
Rationalize-anything syndrome
Reason deficit hyperquack disorder
Conspiracy-tract infection*
Chronic fallacy malignancy
Science-resistant sclerosis


Read more: http://ufoprophet.blogspot.com/#ixzz4N6yY6brn
Follow us: @UFOProphet on Twitter | UFOProphet on Facebook

MMO -- that is the stupidest thing I have ever heard.  In fact, the link I just offered covered this.  Meier has an extensive library.   You think books and periodicals didn't exist pre-internet???  Means...books and periodicals.  Opportunity...ummm, I would assume Meier was reading and writing openly, not real difficult there.  Motive...why don't you tell us Michael?  Why do you lie about the evidence?   Well, actually, assuming you are in fact fooled by Meier, I guess you and him could have slightly different motives.  But presumably his motive is similar to all other cult leaders, e.g., fame, money, to be perceived as someone really really important. 

MMO...ha, what a damn joke.  Any other zingers for me?

Ok, thanks for response. 

However, this is from the link I posted:

QuoteHere MH claims that Meier has published information on the negative effects of space travel for the first time in 1981 (150th contact) which however was only corroborated by scientists decades later in 2012 and 2016 (35 years later). This, according to MH, proves Meier is in contact with extraterrestrials.

Rebuttal:

When did Meier first verifiably publish this information?

Meier only published this information in Semjase Kontakt Berichte, 2nd ed. Vol. 11 in 1994 and not in 1981 as MH wanted all of us to believe. We already know too much regarding his fradulent tactics to fall for them. Even now, MH could still argue that Meier has preemptively published his information first in 1994 i.e. 18 years or 22 years before scientists confirmed it. Could it be true?

As it turns out, many papers and articles have been published about the impact of space travel on the human body and the especially the brain. Following is an excerpt from the Lawrence Journal World newspaper from June 8, 1963:

“Hallucinations, impaired judgment and permanent brain and bone damage are possible hazards of prolonged space flight scientists say.”

News article referring to other negative effects can be read here on BMUFOR.


Read more: http://ufoprophet.blogspot.com/2016/10/new-discovery-black-hole-found.html#ixzz4N0r3FtCT
Follow us: @UFOProphet on Twitter | UFOProphet on Facebook

Without yet having looked deeply into the matter, considering each's trackrecord, I'm gonna go out on a limb and guess ufoprophet.blogspot is correct...

Disregard last question, I found the answer.

http://ufoprophet.blogspot.in/2016/10/new-discovery-black-hole-found.html#axzz4MjxljZI6


New Discovery!!!  Black hole found wandering in Michael Horn's brain!!!