Well I love this show, at least I use to love it but now I don't know anymore. I have been a constant listener for ten years anyhow, probably longer but its getting hard to listen to George lately (it was actually hard a few years ago but now its getting worse). My guess is he is getting tired and I can't blame him. How can anyone interview people every night over and over. I would just become a robot and that is what has happened to George I bet. That being said I just can't stand the meaningless statements like:
Yea, that's true too.
No not at all.
That could be.
And of course.
I think so too.
Well me too.
I don't have to go on about it because I know you all get it. Its just part of not really being involved in the discussion (because he is just burned out) and as a result not bringing out the best in the guest.
OK next. I also just can't stand the leading questions... or should I say; he asks a lot of leading questions, don't you think? There must be some rule in journalism 101 about this. It drives me nuts.
And last. Doesn't he know that it is sooooo obvious he is just reading questions from his screen (I imagine the producer fingering through the guests latest book and typing out a list of possible questions).
Its been bad for a while I know and its a bummer because I don't think there is anything else out there (a guy called Howard Hughes in the UK is an exception).
There has been one positive however. It use to be that RCH drove me nuts too. You see I actually thought he was suppose to be some sort of scientist because George calls him the science advisor. This went on for years, I even wrote George telling him RCH was an embarrasment to the show. But now I get it and I love when RCH is on. Its like a glimpse into madness and its really quite fascinating.
Oh and one more thing... black eyed children really creep me out. Really.
Thanks
Yea, that's true too.
No not at all.
That could be.
And of course.
I think so too.
Well me too.
I don't have to go on about it because I know you all get it. Its just part of not really being involved in the discussion (because he is just burned out) and as a result not bringing out the best in the guest.
OK next. I also just can't stand the leading questions... or should I say; he asks a lot of leading questions, don't you think? There must be some rule in journalism 101 about this. It drives me nuts.
And last. Doesn't he know that it is sooooo obvious he is just reading questions from his screen (I imagine the producer fingering through the guests latest book and typing out a list of possible questions).
Its been bad for a while I know and its a bummer because I don't think there is anything else out there (a guy called Howard Hughes in the UK is an exception).
There has been one positive however. It use to be that RCH drove me nuts too. You see I actually thought he was suppose to be some sort of scientist because George calls him the science advisor. This went on for years, I even wrote George telling him RCH was an embarrasment to the show. But now I get it and I love when RCH is on. Its like a glimpse into madness and its really quite fascinating.
Oh and one more thing... black eyed children really creep me out. Really.
Thanks