• Welcome to BellGab.com Archive.
 
Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - astroguy

#91
Quote from: Theadora on February 12, 2018, 08:48:36 PM
http://www.enterprisemission.com/colors.htm

http://www.enterprisemission.com/colors2.htm
You cannot use Richard Hoagland to prove Richard Hoagland.  And, I've already debunked that.  I'm done arguing with you on this. I'm not sure why I decided to feed the troll.
#92
Quote from: Theadora on February 12, 2018, 08:29:18 PM
Mars sky appears blue not red.  Any images of Mars with red sky have inaccurate color balance.  Why don't you know that, or why are you lying about it?

http://www.themarsrecords.com/wp/the-mars-records/nasa-altering-true-colors-pictures-mars/
Because you're simply wrong.  Basic science shows you're wrong.  Mars' composition shows you're wrong.  Views from Earth show you're wrong.  Even the color calibrators ON THE ROVERS THEMSELVES show you're wrong.
#94
Quote from: =Schlyder= on February 11, 2018, 10:39:32 PM
LOL  No show tonight. RCH has the flu.
Oh good, I don't have to stay up.
#95
Quote from: AlternativeSide on February 11, 2018, 10:07:23 PM
  In contrast to spontaneous torsion flux emissions,  which occur at random intervals without regard to ambient frequency,  Any designated 19.5 vector resonance will achieve a reciprocal spectrum entanglement with implicit hyperdimensional emissions and is in complete accordance with the established Principles of Accutroscopy..


You need to call in and school him.
#96
Quote from: Theadora on February 11, 2018, 05:45:43 PM
Really?  A badge proves his entire story is real?  If I didn't think you were a troll before ...
#97
I feel it relevant to remind everyone that Jay Weidner, the current guest, is in charge of programming at Gaia TV.  You know, that network where Dave Snoory has his show, as does David Wilcock, and is currently promoting the hoax that is the alien Nazca mummy.
#98
Quote from: albrecht on February 10, 2018, 11:59:43 PM
Nothing stood out!

These guys are ridiculous. But  not funny anymore, Get a Schizo or homeless guest. Geez. They could talk at 19.5, etc.
10-37
Steve Quayle?
#99
Quote from: Lunger on February 10, 2018, 11:38:27 PM
He was and it was with his good friends, Carl Sagan, Arthur Clarke, and Steven Hawking.
+Gene Roddenberry
#100
Jesús fuckachta Christo!  If you're not talking, and you're coughing, MUTE YOUR FUCKING MICROPHONE!
#101
Also, his opening monologue is basically, "Everything the guest is about to say is bullshit."  Classy, even for RCH.
#102
13 minutes in, still on a monologue, and having connection issues.
#104
Quote from: Theadora on February 10, 2018, 09:55:13 PM
Wrong again, kerosene breath.  Hoagland busted NASA for turning up the red tint on Mission Control monitors of live Mars feed.  Scientists deal in facts.  What is it that you do besides clean pools?
Prove that Richard's story - and he's the only one who talks about what you just said - really happened.  Then I might look into it.  Not only is eyewitness testimony among the worst kind of evidence, but claimed eyewitness testimony via a third party is hearsay and even worse evidence.
#105
Quote from: zeebo on February 10, 2018, 04:58:53 PM
Ok good news, the model is still solid.
No, he did not admit that for the photos he showed.  He said it was the case with some, but that was early in the program.  Later, he went on to show the blue fuzz images and claimed it was all real glass domes.
#106
The thing is, part of me suspects Hoagie would love to be an Apollo Hoaxer.  Problem is, he absolutely canNOT be: His entire mythology relies on and REQUIRES that the Apollo missions really did go to the moon and that the landings were real.
#107
Quote from: crankshaft on February 08, 2018, 12:49:58 PM

I'd be up for multiple RCH pools. As long as they don't involve much heavy heavy drinking. That old RCH bingo drinking game took a heavy toll on my liver. The only thing that saved me from rehab intervention is the fact that RCH failed to appear for so many of his shows that I was able to sober up enough to come back to my senses. Now that RCH has cut back to officially only two shows per week, plus the fact that RCH still has a very high failure-to-appear rate, the danger is much less; however, the danger is still there. I have to be careful.

I suggest that one pool be the "Braaps Pool".
And another pool be the "Dead Air Pool".

Anyone here have expertise in setting up pools?
I cleaned pools.
#108
Now he's claiming that he's being hacked because of the wonderful things he's talking about. Arrogance, thy name is ...
#109
Quote from: Morgus on February 05, 2018, 12:20:21 AM
This alternate stream is working, not sure if its live right now though?
http://podcast.theothersideofmidnight.com:8000/stream
Ha! Not even protected. That's great.
#110
I've examined Tsiolkovskiy crater with a variety of images at pixel scales as good as 20 m/px, under morning, noon, and dusk lighting conditions, with images from two different spacecraft from two different countries.  Never seen any domes or other allegedly artificial structures.
#111
Hmmm.... that's why I couldn't hear anything. I had the mute button on on my laptop.
#112
Quote from: Morgus on February 04, 2018, 11:50:56 PM
Hoagie says the computer in front of him suddenly shut down. He is blaming it on mysterious forces who don't want him on the air again...
But ... but ... he has that seekret feed now for Club Shmucks that's an independent server so that should get out no matter what, right? 'Cause it's certainly not his own ineptitude and the ignorance of those around him that's keeping him off-air, right!?
#113
Quote from: crankshaft on February 04, 2018, 11:42:27 PM
Blogtalk is still sending data... RCH must have pulled the plug on himself again.
Maybe he should jiggle the you ess bees.
#114
Quote from: expat on February 04, 2018, 06:11:45 PM
Here it is professionally scanned.


Okay, I just hadn't gotten there yet before I went to my meeting.  That is amazing that RCH thinks those are real structures of anything other than crappy scanning.  Just ... wow.
#115
Quote from: Walks_At_Night on February 04, 2018, 06:36:26 PM
So what is RCH's claim here?   

That the muck on the crappy photo of the Earth-rise photo is some sort of ginormous Crystal Cathedral on the moon?

Surely it's not that?
Yes, yes it is that.
#116
Quote from: expat on February 04, 2018, 06:11:45 PM
Here it is professionally scanned.


Clearly fake. Where are the fingerprints to show the human touch?
#117
Quote from: expat on February 04, 2018, 05:50:10 PM
About the two-hour mark. He seems quite unaware that the lines are parallel to the film frame rather than the lunar limb.
Must’ve missed it, I will go back and listen. In a meeting now, though.
#118
Quote from: expat on February 04, 2018, 05:41:24 PM


Oh lovely, Richard. Brilliant example of scanner contamination. Looks like some kid has been pawing at the glass after eating a donut.
Yeah. I haven't heard that one discussed, oddly enough!
#119
And those square blue JPG blocks are not caused by electrostatic discharge on film.  They're caused by JPG compression which compresses blue more than green or red so you will almost always see blue blocks in JPG images more than red or green in darker areas.
#120
Quote from: Dr. MD MD on February 04, 2018, 05:07:46 PM
Did you miss him admitting he was wrong about that one (and apparently so are you)? Hoagies stated that because of the vacuum of space sometimes when they'd snap a photo it would cause an electrostatic charge to be released (after taking several snaps) and that's what that is.  ;)
That was an hour before this point, I did hear him talk about that.  Then he talked about this, and said it's lunar domes / cities / whatever.  Did not say it was a film mistake.
Powered by SMFPacks Menu Editor Mod